Great timing and phrasing. “Be slow about slop development ooor… Burn everyone and everything!”
What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly “inevitable” changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.
- loss of employment? Check.
- profound change to living conditions? Check.
- loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
- threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
- increasing likelihood of war? Check.
- threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
- threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
- Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.
It’s as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the “accusation in a mirror” pattern.
How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.
So no AI then, eh! Eh?
Lol easy choice
False dichotomy
Yeah we can have a global climate disaster without AI too dudes. We have options [jazz hands emoji dot png]
I want newer, cleaner, superior technology made with the help of AI to lessen, stop or even reverse Climate Change.
Also my Room is to damn hot! XD
Not true at all. AI can and should be running on renewables alone.
And closed-loop cooling. But then it will still emit heat, which should be captured in a downstream process.
Yes, Euria and many others in Europa are already doing it.
The Problem is not AI but how Datacenters are used in USA.
Cool, fuck off then.
They just say it. 🫴
I’d pay good money to rid the world of AI
Easiest choice of my life
Don’t threaten me with a good time.
Right? Talk about not being able to read the room.
Clear answer for me - everything else wins over pointless “AI”
Making collages out of human excrement wins over pointless “AI” for me.
Even tRump’s?
Yeah, especially if it’s smeared on his face
Is… Is there a line or what
Even the hyperloop?
Well, thought more of the better stuff like nature, not Musk’s brainfarts
Does not and will never exist, so it isn’t “something” .
Yeah, but what if people suddenly started spending money on it? Would you prefer investment bankers threw billions into that sinkhole or AI?
Hey I love the money hole. My father worked two jobs so he’d have money to dump in the money hole!
Yeah, but what if people suddenly started spending money on fucking Jurassic Park? What about ai then, huh?
Can’t say I’m excited about any of these options. I think we need a movie a bout hyperloop failing catastrophically to make the comparison easier. There already are lots of movies about AI taking over the world and a handful of movies where dinosaur experiments go horribly wrong. Haven’t seen anything about a hyperloop disasters.
Would be cool though. Imagine a hyperloop getting stuck under the pacific ocean. If you open the door, the vacuum will kill you. If you somehow manage that, you’re still under a bezillion tonnes of water, so good luck with that. If you still somehow survive, and make it to the surface, you’re still bezillion km away from shore. The protagonist of that movie is going to need some ridiculous amounts of plot armor, or we’re going to roll the credits after 15 minutes.
I would prefer they sunk money into nearly anything other than AI.
Anything that makes rich people look stupid and blow money is good, yes.
So you’re proAI or what? 😉
Wait fuck.
…
…
…
Shit. You got me with that.
But I’m more pro-OceanGate.
I’m pretty sure “squish” is the exact opposite of “blow”
Damn I don’t know, let me ask chatgpt.
They said they’d love me more if I syntax error input new token so that’s what I live by
Hmmmmm lower electric bills for our countries electorate OR giant buildings they hate that pollute their water, give them ill health from noise pollution, and take their jobs?
I mean, we must choose. Just not in favor of slopcenters burning through resources for highly dubious advantages.
I mean that’s an easy choice, but also no fucking way. Rich pricks would pay for data centers even if they had to run them exclusively off renewables. This is a bluff.
