• HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Going to be fucking hilarious when all the western companies get fucked by China taking over the market they don’t seem to care about.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re wealthy but absolute fucking morons. The people who fall for the “they have money so they must be smart” are such gullible buffoons. CCP is much more competent than American oligarchs, running what could’ve been great with better policy into the ground.

    • isaacblach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t count on China. They are going to invade Taiwan next year and the global trade embargo will be a rounding error to the destruction of the tmsc factories during that war. Or they will capture the fabs and prohibit export to the US. Loose loose for us.

      • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        “China, a country that hasn’t invaded another country in 50 years, is going to invade this country” said the country that invades a country once a decade.

        • Kissaki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          China claiming Taiwan is its territory and threatening invasion, the regular military “training exercises”, even including the specific goal of Taiwan landing operations, and continuous hybrid attacks for years already, like invasion of Taiwan waters with fishing vessels, and cyber attacks, and you’re sitting here claiming China isn’t a country that would invade others. What do you make of these kinds of activities, then?

          The what-aboutism deflection doesn’t work very well on an international comment section, either.

        • jali67@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The issue is not black and white like you people that barely got by high school make it out.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          China a country that has been trying to unify Taiwan since the civil war they couldn’t quite finish.

          • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            When you live in the imperial core of one of the most militaristic nations in the history of the world, everything seems like a provocation.

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Ironic considering much of the world was constantly in conflict prior to Pax Americana.

              • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                America has engaged in war the majority of the post world war 2 era. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan twice, Iraq twice. And that’s not including all the proxy wars they’ve funded.

        • nialv7@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          yes, because what happened in the past can perfectly predict what’s going to happen next.

          not saying you are definitely wrong, but if someone wants to have a bet i wouldn’t bet on the side of China not invading.

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              Spoken like someone who is blinded by the Trump admin, obliviously naive. You must’ve been one of those that thought Russia would never invade Ukraine despite US intelligence.

                • jali67@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  No because you’re using your current “America bad” outrage to justify other countries and their expansionism. Other countries can be bad, you know? Many just were unable to do so under American hegemony.

        • ashar@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Technically and diplomatically, China and Taiwan are the same country

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t understand this thing about anyone destroying those factories for any reason. I don’t think that would happen.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      AI is the last great bubble.

      And it, like all bubbles, will pop.

      You are already seeing the people in the know flee the field.

      You see reports that every company that has adopted it has at best changed nothing, at worst lost money on it.

      Outside of the psychotic linked in CEO bubble, literally no one wants AI. And every day its generating more and more hate due to its halucinations, mistakes, and bullshit.

      Its garnering massive negative attention for its use, and for anyone stupid enough to adopt it at this point (cough intel cough)

      Its a dying star, and people are frantically trying to harvest the last bits of warmth from it before going off in search of new horizons.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can only assume you haven’t used it for anything it’s good at lately. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Just like we still have websites after the dot com bubble, there will still be LLMs after the AI bubble pops.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          The only stories I’ve ever heard of involving AI are told by people who, once again, are unable to see how their increase in productivity is not being met with a reduction in work hours. Unless, or course, “reduction in work hours” means they are being shown the door so a different idiot can do kore work for the same amount of pay.

          Why does everyone feel the need to do as much as possible as quickly as possible at all times of every single day? And why are most people I talk to using ChatGPT to replace Google searches so they don’t need to actually think?

          We all need to slow the fuck down.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            worker productivity continues to climb ever higher, yet wages never grow with it.

            take someone from the 1950s office and ask them to do the same amount of work that an officer worker today does, and they’d quit on the spot. especially since they’d be paid less today than they were in the 1950s as far as buying power goes.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          No, I dont use it.

          I get enough hallucinations and blatant lies from biologicals, I don’t need an AI erasing a mountain to consume the coal underneath to tell me made up bullshit.

        • Sckharshantallas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Certainly, but hopefully you won’t turn on your PC and have 50 popups and 10 different buttons blinking and getting in the way of each other begging you to try AI.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s your source for that. China has no more reason to invade Taiwan next year than they have at any point in the last 30 years

  • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    MY CLASSIC SCI-FI SOFT COVER BOOKS!!??!1

    Edit: MY CLASSIC CONSOLE COLLECTION?!

    The things I love the most don’t have RAM, or I already have them 🤷

  • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    And they told me I was crazy for putting 64 gigs into my machine back in early 2021. I “only” paid about 200 USD

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I bought a netbook (GPD Win Max 2) with 64GB of RAM last year. It was really expensive, by 2025 standards.

      But now I feel like I have the power of the universe in my jacket pocket. Best irresponsible buying decision I ever made.

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I got mine 2 (or shit, is it 3 now) years ago - 10/10 best laptop purchase in a long while.

        GPD have done well for themselves in the small screen laptop space!

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Go ahead, make a lucrative market for consumer ram, see how fast china figures out how ot start filling that need :)

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m fairly certain that spinning up RAM fabs isn’t super quick nor something that doesn’t require the most cutting edge tech.

      China is definitely ahead of the US in a lot of tech, but unless they do invade Taiwan they might not have quite a deep enough bench.

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve not missed a Veritasium video in a long time 😄. I’m sure that RAM is much easier to produce, but DRR5 is pretty complex still, and is what has been snapped up in whole by these AI companies. I’m actually wondering if we’ll see a resurgence of DDR4 motherboards, as those fabs are likely around still, just likely more idle if used at all.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    What I’m surprised hasn’t happened yet is RAM ICs being recycled at the retail level. As in, you could bring in an old laptop or phone with 32GB of soldered RAM and it would be desoldered and sold for cash or possibly even soldered into a new device you buy from that retailer.

    I wonder how close we are to that business model arriving.

  • nightlily@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    I‘m switching hobbies to gunpla. No one has managed to put DRAM in an airbrush to the best of my knowledge.

  • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t wait till these companies shutter their AI shit and that supply gets dumped back into the market

    Knowing real life some other party will juice it and ride the ram shortage for another few years, just keeping the supply as a speculative income stream.

  • btsax@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d just point out that now might be a good time to add a whole-house surge arrester and/or get a bunch of new surge arresting power strips for your hardware. They have a useful life measured in joules dissipated so replace them if they’re old too or your cheap RAM (among other things) may let out the magic smoke one day.

  • lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I was supposed to get a device with 64 gigs of RAM later this year. I just got an email telling me that due to the RAM shortage they’ve cancelled the 64 gig version.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    329
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think calling it a RAM shortage is a bit incorrect. It is not like we are running out of raw materials or something else in the supply chain is broken. It’s shitty AI companies buying RAM that is not existing yet with money they don’t have. Unfortunately there’s no good term for that, I guess.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Supply monopolization?

      Consumer fraud?

      Sherman Act cartel market manipulation.

      Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      153
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s called Imaginary Economics.

      It tends to happen right before a capitalist system fails.

      • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is this a thing? Because what comes to mind for me is “the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent,” which just happens sometimes

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It tends to happen right before a capitalist system fails.

        How often does this happen that we can claim this correlation? 🤔

        • Venator@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          About once every 350 years… With a sample size of 3… 😅

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            So you’re saying which empires/systems exactly then?

            Spain perhaps? The Holy Roman empire?

            • Venator@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I was averaging roman, British and Mongolian empires, based on Google AI summary, so take that with a pinch of salt 😅 🧂

        • kingofras@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s about to. The very nature of it, means you can only have a sample size of one.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            8 days ago

            And when do you predict this will occur? When should I have built my nuclear shelter so I know when to start building it?

            • kingofras@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              8 days ago

              Too late for that I’m afraid. It already happened. It just takes a while before the [citation needed] folks understand that past performance is not a guarantee for future success.

              • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                Lol sure, any time now, just one more year bro, just one more year and it will collapse bro, promise.

                Maybe the usa will collapse a bit (because those people are often americans that don’t know there are other countries out there) but that’s another story.

                • kingofras@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I highly recommend staying ignorant honestly. It’s a much lighter burden to carry than seeing all the datapoints and seeing the collapse as a certainty. Have a good life, seriously.

        • daddycool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s the biggest bubble seen to date. It has all the characteristics, and it will crash eventually.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          People can see the trends and see how it will probably break down in some way, the problem is that the market can stay irrational longer than we can stay solvent. It helps that these dipshits seem to have forgotten that money equals abstract resources and creating new resource issues that’ll certainly put pressure on them in a more direct way either through legislation or via sabotage of required infrastructure.

    • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 days ago

      I like electron finance

      Their exact location cannot be pinpointed; instead, they exist in a probability cloud where they are likely to be found at any given time.

      That’s what this hype cycle is founded on. If I lend you $5, you have $5 you can lend further. Now, we each still have a right to $5, so we can lend that debt obligation again for $4.50. Now we have, somehow, a market value of $19.

      Until someone looks, then it’s probably 0.

    • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Unfortunately there’s no good term for that, I guess.

      Market manipulation?

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s a racket, plain and simple. There used to be laws against this sort if thing.

        Keyword: used to

        I hope that it was worth it, and that America is great again. Let me just check some news articles… Oh my

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s shitty AI companies buying RAM

      It’s greedy manufacturers selling it all to them in the first place and other market segments be damned.
      I’m no AI fan but the manufactures aren’t angels either.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The money is fixed. You getting a raise means the money has to come from somewhere- which means the boss taking a pay cut or the customers paying more.

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Still not the same, i don’t work for any of those manufacturers - and if i did i sure as hell wouldn’t care if their CEOs got a paycut to benefit the consumers. Won’t someone please pity the CEOs…

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I’m referring to the relationship between someone offering you more money for the same work the difference of which gets passed on to consumers.

                A few consumers are going to a business and offering more money for the same work. The consumer is the business’s boss just like your boss might offer you more money. You aren’t going to turn down the raise because it will hurt other consumers just like the business isn’t going to turn down the money even though it will cost other consumers more.

                and if i did i sure as hell wouldn’t care if their CEOs got a paycut to benefit the consumers

                I brought that up because that wasn’t going to happen. If you get a raise, your boss isn’t going to take a paycut to make it happen. The raise comes from the consumers.