Just four days out from a government shutdown, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has declared a bipartisan Senate stopgap measure dead on arrival.

Senators, having apparently lost faith in McCarthy’s ability to stave off a shutdown, negotiated a bill late Tuesday night that funds the government until Nov. 17 and includes $12 billion in aid and disaster relief for Ukraine. It’s expected to be voted on by the end of the week before being sent over to the House, and is intended to buy lawmakers more time to hash out a longer-term deal, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said.

But, according to Punchbowl News, McCarthy said in a closed-door meeting on Wednesday morning that he wouldn’t take up a bill that includes Ukraine funding but no border security measures. “I don’t see the support in the House,” he reportedly said.

Aid for Ukraine has been one of several sticking points for ultraconservative hardliners in the House who have repeatedly sabotaged McCarthy’s efforts to get spending bills passed.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    243
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t “Ultraconservative”, they’re “Russian Plants in the US Political system”

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Government shutdowns” are, among other things, wage theft from government employees.

    In the Gingrich shutdowns of the 1990s, even active-duty military members’ pay was delayed without compensation for up to three weeks. Yes, that’s right: the Republicans literally stole paychecks from our soldiers and sailors just to stick it to Bill Clinton. (And maybe to give a little handout to their buddies in the payday loan business.)

    More recent shutdowns have spared active-duty DoD, but still perpetrated wage theft against members of the Coast Guard and other defense-critical services. That was the case in the 2018-2019 shutdown, for example.

    You can’t convince me you care about border security if you don’t fucking pay the Coast Guard.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but who cares about them, we have to look all tough and whatnot with our talk of border walls and self-reliance and Galt Gulch fantasies.

      • DrMorose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Has anyone not seen Pacific Rim…

        I jest but I am one of the thousands of govt employees that will be furloughed if the govt shuts down.

        I really hate to get into conspiracy theory territory but I think Jan 6 was a precedent setting situation to further the GOP agenda to make any kind of march because of this BS that is being pulled by certain politicians to try to remove them will be met with the whole see the other side is doing it and they are bad.

        I really hope I am wrong and I am reading the situation wrong, but with the way things are going…who the fuck knows.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      CBP (aka the US Border Patrol) will also not get paid during the shutdown. They care so much about border security that they aren’t paying the agents and officers manning “the wall”.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry, but I have zero sympathy for military service members.

      The GOP has repeatedly spat in their face and they continue to vote for them in overwhelming fassion, because “macho” or some bullshit.

      Other federal workers I do feel bad for.

      Fuck the GOP.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because when Republicans are in power, military make more. Ask any active military member, and they’ll tell you they always make more money when a Republican President is in power.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    1 year ago

    This stupid fuck. All he has to do is negotiate with the Democrats. His speakership is over regardless. He must know that. The only point in what he’s doing now is cruelty. People will starve and he’s fine with it. He wants it.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      His speakership is over.

      If he allows Democrats to save his ass, Republican voters will despise him, costing him paid gigs as a Republican pundit in their echo chambers where Republican voters go to have their fucked up biases reconfirmed in between My Pillow ads.

      Americans have permitted greed to become the first and only consideration in every facet of American life. That has consequences, well deserved consequences.

      This is what happens when hyper-individualism and greed become core societal values instead of the severe character defects that harm others they actually are. There isn’t some magic switch that flips for people when they become politicians that makes them selfless. They take the dog eat dog, capitalist, “I got mine and fuck you,” rational self-interest core American values that we fully celebrate and mandate in every other aspect of American life with them, and vote on legislation solely on the basis of what they personally have to further gain. As long as we encourage our people to be selfish as a culture, as we do to the extreme, our leadership will be a reflection of that. So long as a typical American parent is proud of their oil executive child for making lots of money, instead of ashamed at the harm their child’s chosen industry does to society, we will have McCarthys in charge.

      No honor among capitalists. Just a race down into oblivion. We chose to keep the delusion of making “fuck you” money alive at the expense of being a society that cares about what happens to each other and future generations. And sadly there’s more Americans that somehow still want to stay on that course, as we’re all just temporarily embarrassed millionaires who don’t want to be hindered by what we still owe to society when it’s our turn to punch down.

      “I’m not rich, but someday I will be, and then all the poories better watch their step!”

      -The perfectly healthy American mindset

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All he has to do is negotiate with the Democrats.

      He did. The Budget was negotiated with President Biden back in June / July. What’s happened is that he can’t get the Freedom Caucus to vote for what he negotiated. It’s ridiculous.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know I’m in the minority in this, but you know the most fucked up thing?

    This impasse won’t end because of the pressure of federal workers suffering.

    This impasse will end because our credit rating effects the profitability of our capitalist owners, whose sociopathic greed infecting our society is the reason we have sociopathic politicians like McCarthy in the first place.

    Because here in the US, sociopathy is encouraged, even mandated in business by shareholders, hurt whatever peasants you want if it makes you an extra nickel, just not the owners. That was Bernie Madoff’s mistake.

    Edited for spelling

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember: him and (especially) the far-right goons want a shutdown. They know Republicans will rightly be blamed in the short-term. But they’re willing to accept that, and even worse: they’re willing to damage the entire country and weaken our National Security to hurt the economy while Biden is president. That’s all this is! Don’t let anyone ever forget…

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t forgetting, the problem is making them go against the programming they’re being fed by whatever propaganda outlet they choose to consume. Those institutions just launder shit ideas and convince the viewer that they are correct and everyone else is wrong. We’d just be “reminding” them of something that “isn’t true.”

      I strongly believe our biggest problem in the US is the conflict between the need for a free press and the press abusing the absolute shit out of that, being literal propaganda outlets.

      • Okashiikessen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I strongly believed for years that the benefit of a non-state-affiliated press was that it was free of state control, thus less likely to become propaganda outlets.

        Don’t worry, I realized the flaw in that logic over ten years ago.

        Money. Money was the flaw.

        Fuck capitalism.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      You sound just like Reddit, where EVERYTHING and ANYTHING was the Republican’s fault. Republicans want funds to go towards a border crisis that Democrats want to ignore. Democrats want to send BILLIONS to Ukraine, but literally turn a blind eye to what’s happening in our own country. Ever since Biden took over, the Democrats have chosen to ignore what’s been going on with our immigration issues, literally, they don’t want to talk about it or do anything because they don’t want to give even the slightest indication that Trump and Republicans have been right all along about having border issues. If we can send billions to another country, we sure as hell can send money to help with our borders.

      • deadtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Living on the border a stones throw from Mexico myself… what border crisis? Care to articulate and provide some citations to back it up?

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everything is the Republican’s fault. Sometimes the Democrats go along with stupid Republican ideas. There is a crisis at the border, but Republicans are offering solutions that will be far less effective at addressing the issue than what Progressives want. There is some blame on the Democrats for not explaining what would solve the crisis, but the Republican solutions aren’t going to address the problem effectively, and lead to a ton of death and suffering.

      • andxz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You say that, and there’s no denying there are border related problems, but if you think the solution lies within the party that supports someone who thinks a mote filled with hungry alligators is a viable one you might want to rethink a thing or two.

        Just a humble suggestion.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t see the support in the House.

    Then bring it up for a vote and let it be defeated, you nincompoop.

    This lying wimp knows it would pass, and would rather cost the economy billions than risk looking like he’s not a big powerful strong man.

    • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      My opinion is that ANY legislation that is passed in one chamber MUST be brought to a vote in the other. No quietly killing bills that clearly already have legs. If you want to squash things originating in your chamber, fine, but not something already in motion.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s what speakers do. Pelosi was notorious for not bringing important issues to a vote because she “didn’t have the votes.” I’m not saying it’s not some serious bullshit, I’m just saying.

  • 314r8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump wants a shut down. Trump gets a shut down. Trump wants to blame Biden. I don’t think that’s going to go so well

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trump wants to blame Biden. I don’t think that’s going to go so well

      I think that’s expecting too generous a response from voters. To be clear, I don’t want a shutdown even if MAGA Republicans are 100% blamed for it. There’s just too many people that will be hurt by this.

      But unfortunately, those dumb motherfuckers will immediately forget who held the government hostage and damaged the entire country to do it. I say that as judgementally as possible because they are willfully stupid, as long as they can hurt those they don’t agree with… And make no mistake: this will hurt the economy, and unfortunately even “moderate” Republicans will blame Biden for that. No one but Trump wins from a government shutdown…

      edit: autocorrect

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna go ahead and predict that by this time next week, he’s going to not be Speaker of the House anymore. Also, automatic ejection and disqualification from the speakership in the future should be an automatic mechanism that gets triggered when the house is unwilling to fund the government.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not at all, but you couldn’t just send home the shitty ones. Ideally, the ones that are causing the problems wouldn’t be reelected, but unfortunately we all know that isn’t how it works.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right now I honestly worry that implementing your “replace them all” solution would lead to WORSE people being elected.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              We don’t really have to worry about it, because it won’t happen in the foreseeable future. We spend too much on elections to suddenly reelect several hundred congress people.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weakest American in history? Like literally, I’m thinking. I’ve never seen a man so sackless and small in my 40 plus years. Has anyone else?

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oooh, yeah. He’s another too, but ol Kevin has been in Congress 16 years now, and he regularly gets shit on by people like Gaetz, who’s a relative newcomer who clung to Trumps nuts to get into office.

        Kevin should be eating Matt’s lunch, not the other way around. Weakest bastard to ever hold the Speakership for sure.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    There absolutely would be support from Democrats and moderate Republicans. But he refuses to work with Democrats.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He could neuter the MAGA Rs if he was willing to get the Dems and the rest of the Rs to vote for this bill. The fringe could call for a vote on his speakership–but he could negotiate to keep it. Dems would love to neuter the fringe republicans. The Republicans would love to. They just need someone to sack up and actually do it.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So I think I must’ve slept past part of highschool civics class. Why does the Speaker of the House get to unilaterally decide what bills the House will vote on? If this bill was unanimously supported by Democrats and a few Republicans, it would pass. So how does one man just decide not to vote on it and shut down the government?

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not totally unilateral. If a majority of members sign onto what’s called a discharge petition, legislation can advance without the speaker’s approval. The issue is:

      1. There’s a process and it takes about 30 days to do that.

      2. Republicans typically refuse to sign onto these when in the majority, even the moderates.

    • WagesOf@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      His literal function is to decide what gets voted on. You smelt past a lot of class.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moderate reps have made a couple of grumbling noises suggesting they might attempt to bypass him with the Dems on this but supposedly the specific process in question is VERY rarely invoked.