Don’t you mean Hillary?

Sounds like he had pre written talking points about fuel prices before the iran war started, and he was like fuck it I’m not going to change them!

well, if its a disaster it might just be free anyway, but if they make it much worse I’ll be less likely to turn it on that once or twice a year unless absolutely needed. I do need to stay connected for work at various times of the year, but I can sometimes work around that.

lol, I wrote a reply about a company etching onto silicon and then go down and saw yours. Oops.

I hadn’t heard AMD bought them though. Looks like they’re working on a 20b model as well for this year.

someone else replied with what i said

From my understanding if you have a home type plan, moving isn’t allowed, and never was.

If you had a roaming plan, which was more expensive, moving was allowed and that included the cheap plans.

Then they made this roaming standby mode which cost money instead of a free offline paused subscription and was $5 USD a month and included unlimited low speed (<1mbps) and moving.

Then less than a year later, that plan became $10 USD, and moving was disabled.

So only the expensive roaming plans now include it.

I had originally bought a dish as part of my emergency prepare package as im in a natural disaster risk area, but just kept it paused. Then the standby thing happened and I begrudgingly was okay to pay the $5 as it did have some perks. But $10 for something I was only planning for emergencies and maybe using once or twice a year? No thank you. And i canceled. Ill just turn it on the once a year when i need it for $10 then turn it off again.

Edit: oh and those changes aligned with just before the IPO so it was an attempt to get more money and raise subscribers.

Dont get me wrong here, I dont think LLMs as designed will ever be sentient or anything like that either. The architecture is just plain wrong. But I dont think itll have to be something like that to warrant ‘it’.

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Human David Hoffman
He works in my dad's store
He's worked here for 12 years
He'll probably work here for more

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Human Dave Gort
I've known since I was six
In grade eight he broke his leg
So we got drunk and sick

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Some of them are Davids
[Human Dave Gort: But most of us are Human Daves]
They all have their own hands
But they come from different moms

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Dave Jadiski
Man, this cat can swing
He weighs almost 50 pounds
And he delivers my paper on time

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Human Dave Capisano
I hardly know him

These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know
These are the Daves I know, I know
These are the Daves I know

Do you not think a line will eventually need to be drawn somewhere though? You might not trust what these companies are saying, but what if you take it at face value that what they said is true. And things like that keep happening in more complex and unexpected ways as the LLMs are allowed to run continuously and autonomously while connected to a fully functioning and ever improving harness?

I’ll chime in again on the end here, as I think this is where you might be wrong.

There is no “oh god it’s moving on it’s own” moment, at least as far as I know.

There have been lots of reports of AI’s doing unexpected things and hacking other companies. To be fair, these AI’s from my understanding had been given instructions to try and do hacking things, but none of them were explicitly told to go and hack such and such company.

I imagine, to some extent, we’re going to be the ones that help write or train these self replicating capabilities as part of research, and once the AI is capable of doing it, it very well might just do it, the same way it ended up exploiting these other websites even though it wasn’t explicitly instructed to.

There are also always on running LLMs AI’s nowadays, and who the fuck knows what it might loop itself into doing from some initial instruction, maybe even from a hallucination altering its directive in a feedback loop.

Edit: So in this sense, yes I think ‘it’ can be the AI. (edit2: and is exactly in the start of the “oh god it’s moving on it’s own" territory)

Edit 3: Example - Always on LLM with an initial context of “be helpful”, could decide on it’s own, after its owner complains that the stove light doesn’t work well in a casual conversation, hack the stove so it can control it better for them as that will be helpful.

If its Starshield it was probably ordered by Trump. The DoD controls that, and its unlikely SpaceX would alter it without their request.

Imagine how the DoD would feel if SpaceX unilaterally altered DoD service. The DoD needs to believe, even if its not true, that they have operational control.

Edit: Musk has now chimed in saying the government is in control of starshield not SpaceX as expected.

Many of these IoT devices have incredibly poor security and if they’re connected to the internet can be hacked. The bigger models are very good at finding exploits and using them as well, so it could search for devices and break into vulnerable ones then send something to self replicate and start process.

The bigger models might exploit the parents company as well and get in that way. E.g hack a smart security camera company and then find a way into the cameras.

The AI that attempts to self replicate on the IoT type devices. (if a pile of these appear, it kept showing “error” when submitting)

You’re going to notice your fridge is running at max processing?

I didnt read it all, its long, but they did mention it generating tokens at 0.39/s on one. So its slow as fuck, but it doesnt care like we would.

Dang, wish someone would build me one for free! Thats super cool of them though!

And how many security vulnerabilities have you found? 516 is still a lot. One of those had been in the Linux kernal for decades.

Edit: and many of those real ones from the 6000 group anthropic says the maintainers just didn’t want to fix as it was outside their threat model. A vulnerability in the Linux kernal, is different than one on an alarm clock app or something less serious.

Edit: And for people that don’t know, this decades old linux exploit wasn’t just a single bug it found. It was able to piece together multiple smaller exploits that it found, that led to being able to exploit this bigger bug.

He definitely can afford it yes, but its still a big ask to want someone to spend 15-25k or whatever it would be (shits getting more expensive by the day) to use a tool that he can just do pay per use. The code is open source so its not like he’d be using a local llm to keep it private.

He’s doing it though. So that’s kind or moot. Fable is out there finding bugs in these things, so seems like if he is going to do it, using the thing that’s already making it more secure by finding multiple exploits is the right choice of what to use.

You wouldn’t want him using a local model unless he was running some fancy rig that could run a high end frontier model. Thats just aaking for likelihood of more bugs. He might not have such a thing laying around.