Well shit, Janelle, maybe you should have asked the lava frog before posting his picture on Twitter.
Well shit, Janelle, maybe you should have asked the lava frog before posting his picture on Twitter.
When a better outcome is possible, but fails to happen, everyone who would have preferred it but did nothing to contribute to the effort is at fault. Had Kamala Harris won, a peaceful solution would not yet be achieved, but would still be possible. Now that Donald Trump has won, a peaceful solution is no longer possible. Is that what the people who stayed home or voted Green want?
Edit: the other stuff I said was kind of mean, so I took it out.
Because we live in the real world where we recognize that Trump or Harris were going to be the next president, and Harris’ ambiguity on Gaza and susceptibility to pressure from Democrat voters is, while not ideal, still better than Trump’s open lust for Muslim blood and complete indifference to what pro-palestinian voters want.
This is like saying “my vote doesn’t matter, it’s not like the candidate I would have voted for lost by a single vote”
“Their votes alone didn’t swing the election” and “Their actions were the opposite of helpful in preventing genocide” can both be true.
The meta verse was kinda fun to talk about, though. Because it was a train wreck.
“It’s time for us to hunker down and wait for the peasants to run out of energy, then go back to business as usual.”
-DNC leadership
2 square miles in length
From the man with 2 inches of brain mass and 13 oz of IQ.
I expected someone to be evangelizing for Linux as an alternative to enshittified Windows.
Shocked this thread is an hour old with no mention of Linux. Whoopsie.
I recall reading early on that DNC campaign advisers were recommending against continuing with the “weird” rhetoric, and the article mentioned some specific people who had worked on the 2016 campaign. It floored me that those people still had jobs. I guess they got their way eventually. I now have no expectation that they won’t be doing the same shit in 2028.
DNC Leadership would rather lose with a neoliberal candidate than win with a progressive one.
Pretty sure this is satire.
“So you’re saying all we need to do is keep you busy with a full time job that you need just to survive?”
-The capitalists, probably
Dear Green Party voters: the fascists thank you. The Palestinians those fascists will kill don’t thank you.
We could have had funniest moment of the year if authorities seized his Mercedes while he was voting.
The guy who said it probably doesn’t grammar all that well anyway.
Apparently one too many people called him gay over this: he posted a tiktok a short while ago saying he meant what he said and “concubine” basically means slave, apparently hoping the people who follow him don’t know better.
You guys probably feel pretty powerless watching the US elections from other countries. If it helps, those of us who live here feel pretty powerless too. Even those who live in swing states, from what I hear.
Still voted, though.
Maybe. I’d prefer we give her a year or two to see how progressive she’s going to be. We’re forced to work within the Democrat party for now, and if we’re seen as a bunch of malcontents, centrist Democrats will see that as an excuse to reach out to more “gettable” moderates and conservatives instead
Serves them right.