• dont-YOLO-ragequit@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even when the hood isn’t that high, a boxy front-end — with a grille that’s nearly vertical and a hood that goes almost straight out from the windshield — is more likely to cause death or serious injury to a pedestrian. In general, vehicles with box-shaped front ends, even when they’re only medium height, are roughly 26% more likely to kill a pedestrian, according to the IIHS.

    The article clarifies that it’s the vertical and boxy shaped front end that is the cause of more lethal torso injuries.

    A sporty shaped front end will put it back to normal ( even more if lower).

  • Protholl@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What study? Why the F is the study at the end of the headline after a comma? Where are the data points about the view from the pedestrians and how they deal with all of that “square motor vehicle” nonsense? Can anybody provide the information about the relative numbers of “boxy SUVs and Pickup trucks” vs any other 4 wheel mode of transport that seems intent on killing innocent civilians?

    Nope… didn’t think so this is just CNN trolling.

      • Infinite-EV@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        we should wait and see what crash test results it gets. Current Tesla models are some of the best in terms of crash test results.

  • Captain_Alaska@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s 2023 and we’re still blaming the vehicle design and not the total lack of pedestrian impact regulations on US market cars.

    • Allaroundlost@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly this. Well said.

      If only we could get people to PUT DOWN THEIR PHONES AND LOOK WHERE THEY ARE GOING !

    • Deadbeatdebonheirrez@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s 2023 and we’re still blaming the vehicle design and not the total lack of pedestrian impact regulations on US market cars.

      Is this a joke or just wild irony?

      • redpaladins@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not a joke, most of the pedestrian safety innovation are from euro cars where there’s regulation apparently

    • robmox@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait, in your eyes a front-facing camera isn’t the solution to people running over children? You want to gasp MAKE THE TRUCKS NOT STUPID?! How dare you?

    • Exodia101@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If we had pedestrian impact regulations vehicles would not be designed the way they are right now.

    • spongebob_meth@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And the fact that nobody (drivers and pedestrians) will bother to look up from their screens for literally anything

      • iceberg_slim1993@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s probably a big factor. There are a couple others that reddit isn’t ready to handle but it is in one of the linked articles.

        It really has little to do with front end design (which is a stupid theory on its face).

        • RollinOnDubss@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Go look at pedestrian deaths by year and try and guess the year the Iphone released. Here’s a hint, its the year before rates started to increase after they had been steadily decreasing for 30 years.

          Truck market share hasn’t increase that much, nor have trucks actually gotten any bigger. Also the SUV craze had already been in full swing since the early 2000s as their market share only went up like 5% between 2000 & 2013.

          I don’t doubt for a second SUVs & Trucks are more dangerous in pedestrian collisions, they’re bigger vehicles it’s a given. But the increase in pedestrian fatalities is 95% driven by smart phone related distracted driving.

      • noh-seung-joon@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        this is the thing that really gets my goat, aside from we car enthusiasts, does anyone actually enjoy driving? (as an enthusiast, I don’t enjoy 99% of the driving I do) from what I can tell it’s just a distraction from trolling your ex’s IG while you’re sitting at a (green) light.

        we pay such a price to implement this system of “cars as personal transport” and then we tied it to the mast of USS American Freedom and now the ship is sinking and we’re underwater on the note…

  • AnonymousEngineer_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s look at it another way. If someone wants more than five seats, their choice is either a large crossover/SUV or some sort of van.

    Given the general front end profile of a passenger van, is it actually any better for a pedestrian to be hit by something like a Toyota Alphard or a Lexus LM?

  • AmateurEarthling@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Won’t catch me hitting anyone in my boxy Jeep XJ. While everyone else is going 60 in a 45 I’m barely leaving the light hitting 25.

    • Spud_Rancher@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I saw a sticker on a Wrangler the other day that said “Go around, if it could go any faster it wouldn’t be shaped like a fucking brick”

      It’s not often I chuckle at window stickers

  • Fantastic_Mr-Fox_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And I can’t have my goddamn pop up headlights while Derek is out here in a truck that can’t see the ground 20 feet in front of it splattering children smh

    • gumol@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And I can’t have my goddamn pop up headlights

      you can, they’re legal in the US. They became unnecessary after US relaxed its regulations on headlights. US had a ban on aerodynamic headlights, so that’s why we had pop-ups.

    • nlpnt@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      FWIU pop-ups weren’t regulated out of existence, at least in America. They just fell out of fashion and any proposal to re-implement them gets nixed at the corporate level on grounds of cost and complexity.

  • WatchStoredInAss@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just proves my belief that people who drive these huge trucks for non-work purposes (and put grille guards for that extra “guarantee” of pedestrian death) are complete, maniacal psychopaths.

  • Ghost17088@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My company makes me drive a full size truck. I was stopped on a slight incline pulling into the coffee shop and I literally could not see a whole ass car that was in front of me, I just had to know he was there and wait until he moved far enough forward I could see him. The blind spots are ridiculous.

    • ResEng68@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep. Mauled my neighbor’s 60 gallon trash can one morning. Couldn’t see it in front of my hood.

      I love that damn, trashy vehicle. But, I can understand the logic surrounding tighter safety regs.