Most people turned to congratulate Chelsea for the fascinating game, but indeed Manchester City has a few advantages over key decisions. The most apparent controversies were the soft penalty awarded again, and no foul for the handball. Sadly if the standard of refereeing is normal, Chelsea should deserve a win.

  • Slobhunter@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The handball was a case of the ref/linesman not seeing it and because it was outside of the box VAR couldn’t do anything so I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt even if I think it was pretty incompetent of them not it be watching properly. The first pen was a pile of bullshit though.

    • The_prawn_king@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Handball is such a weird one because it would’ve been a dangerous place to have a free kick, not sure why they don’t look at those ones when it’s so clear

        • jod1991@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Free kicks taken as shots have a 6% goal rate overall. So that’s 1 in 17.

          Being charitable probably between 1-2 in 10 from there I’d guess.

    • Chapea12@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could see the ref missing it, but the linesman is on that side of the pitch. How could he miss it

      • BogosiGaborone@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wtf, it was outside the box and Walker wasn’t even looking nor could anticipate the ball. The Chelsea penalty however was nonsense. Dias got the ball and he dived

      • DragomirSlevak@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you blink, you miss it. These things happen. People forget what it was like in the past. The most incredible infractions would happen all the time. It’s unfortunately normal.

      • Retinion@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        but the linesman is on that side of the pitch

        Linesman missed a blatant corner for Arsenal the other day when it clear was you like rebounded off an opponent not 2ft away from him.

        It’s like how much clearer does something need to be

        • Damian_F06@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Refs have line technology so if the ball had completely crossed the line, which it didnt, they would have called it.

          • Lord_Vxder@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It went out of play and they called a goal kick. It for sure went out of play. They just gave the wrong decision even though it happened right in front of the linesman.

      • 1bingchilling@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People complain about this then also complain about VAR being a thing. Either you like “human error” or you don’t.

      • Podberezkin09@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh there’s way too much uncertainty around where the ball would have gone if Walker didn’t block it, if there was only Chelsea players around and Edersons pass was obviously going to fall to us it should be a red since no goalkeeper in goal = goalscoring chance if that fall to us, but it’s too unclear where the ball was going to go to say Walker prevented a goalscoring opportunity. Looked like Ederson was trying to pass to a defender on the touchline and that’s where the pass was headed

        • charlos74@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no reason for Walker to handball it deliberately, nothing to be gained from intercepting his own keepers clearance.

        • biaff33@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was a clearance. It was headed 60 meters down the field. It certainly wasn’t going to create an immediate goal scoring opportunity.

          It wasn’t awarded a handball bc of the exemption for a ball kicked by a teammate. The end.

      • Slobhunter@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As much as it pains me to defend Man City I can’t agree with that, it was blocking a clearance from his own keeper, if anything a handball in that situation is more likely to create a chance for the opposition than to block it which it may well have done if Sterling hadn’t stopped to appeal for the hand ball and had instead put pressure on Gvardiol who had the ball in a much more dangerous position than he would have been if the ball hadn’t been obstructed.

    • burneracc101fake@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an excuse. I bet you if it was the opposite then Rodri would be crying to the ref and he would bend the rules and give a free kick

    • Critical-Usual@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A pile of bullshit because it’s popular to root against City? Because if it was given to say Luton vs Chelsea I’m sure everyone would say it was the right decision