It’s the truth?

No you or I would end up in a massive hole financially most likely. But they will be fine because they’re incredibly wealthy and despite what everyone says the almost immediately find a club to take them.

Innocent until proven guilty means that you don’t get locked up for life without proving that you committed a crime in court. It doesn’t mean you get to be on TV every weekend.

I wonder what exactly the point of a point deduction to a club that has none of the people here that committed the breaches.

Not really the same but yeah that would potentially soften the sentencing

Chelsea make up like 20% of all the goals scored here

Handball is such a weird one because it would’ve been a dangerous place to have a free kick, not sure why they don’t look at those ones when it’s so clear

I think football is less positional in the sense it was 20 years ago. If you view a 10 as a position on the pitch any team playing 4231 plays a 10. If you view it as a role then there’s a number of players who qualify, de bruyne and Maddison are creative hubs that link the midfield to the attack.

But he’s LARGE. So that means he’s a 6 apparently

He’d be better in that position but you’d waste odegaard who is the better player on the ball and should be more involved going forwards than havertz

Mount to united doesn’t make sense not because mount is a bad player but because he doesn’t fit in their squad. He’s best in a midfield or forward role where his defence impact is pressing a back line. So either the more advanced 8 or a 10 or on a wing with a wingback to defend the wide areas and provide width. At united those roles are taken by Fernandes and rashford and we’ve seen Fernandes is best with a double pivot which I don’t think mount works best in. Weird signing imo, mount would’ve been much better at Liverpool or arsenal.

Can’t you at least finish the Man City investigation before looking into decade old chelsea business

A well run sports washing machine aye