Hi everyone. I’m a senior Computer Engineering student and my girlfriend is a senior Mechanical Engineering student.

She is caring, cute, clever and really thoughtful. I love everything about her. But the one thing that always bugs me out is the amount of AI she uses.

When we met 2 years ago the first topic we talked about was about AI and ever since that day I always mentioned her the advancements and dangers of AI. I said how there can’t be ethical AI and any use of it is harmful.

She agrees with me every time and says she will decrease her usage but at the end she uses it still. Projects, reports, homeworks all go through the LLM. She shows me her work and I can’t congratulate her without forcing myself because I know it’s AI.

She has diagnosed ADHD and I think this might be one of the reasons but I still don’t understand. She sometimes spends hours working. If she had spent that time with pen and paper she could’ve reached the same conclusions she did with AI but with more understanding of her work.

I don’t want to upset her but also seeing someone this close to me do this is saddening to me. What should I do? Should I just ignore it?

  • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I also have ADHD and dont use AI.

    What i do with my partner who also uses AI to do stuff on their website or the server, and when ever I call them out for it, they get defensive. So i just ignore it now. It is not a thing i want to throw the relationship away for.

    We are both IT. Them Sys. Admin, me Software Dev…

  • SpicyPepper@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not right of you to try to change her. She knows you’re not ethically aligned. If it’s a huge problem for you that sounds like a deal breaker. I am an AI user and would be grossed out if my partner was disgusted by my use if it and asked the internet what to do instead of just dealing with it up front.

    • dusk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      “She knows you’re not ethically aligned. If it’s a huge problem for you…”

      ai user proving the problem with ai users yet again… no ethics, doesn’t even understand what they are.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    She has diagnosed ADHD and I think this might be one of the reasons but I still don’t understand. She sometimes spends hours working. If she had spent that time with pen and paper she could’ve reached the same conclusions she did with AI but with more understanding of her work.

    This is absolutely a thing. ADHD fucks the reward center of your brain, so you don’t really feel a lot of satisfaction from working (or any at all). If you spend that time with a pen and paper it just feels like a waste of time, even if you complete the job you set out to do. There’s still the reward at the end of the task, but the work itself does not feel rewarding. Medication helps, but it’s not magic.

    What you’re basically telling her is “spend more time miserable” and are surprised she won’t.

    • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m anti-AI but these two things are not remotely similar. You can’t slowly Claude yourself to death over a number of years as your friends and family are forced to watch.

      • dusk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can claude your friends and family to death though, while they watch you turn into even more of a self absorbed muppet every single day

      • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wut? That’s what I see in a lot of my friends on instagram. Which had lead to a lot of suicides.

        And it’s the same with AI chat bots. I’ve completely lost some friends. When I ask then a question, they just paste it into their chat and paste that slop response back to me

        The first step is admitting they have a problem.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        See that’s where I’m going to disagree with you. I can name a handful of people who are logically dead already. Tons of people have destroyed their lives (and lost their lives) due to the psychosis they were allowed to build up while conversing only with AI.

          • Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I really have to find a way to catch up on that show, I hear they now call it South America.

            • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Probably not worth it. Just watch an episode here and there where someone recommends it

              The episode I was talking about is Season 27 Episode 3: Sickofancy. In it, Randy gets addicted to chatgpt, and decides he’s going to get VP funding for a startup, takes a bunch of ketamine, and realizes that he’s gone bankrupt by the terrible advice from his AI chat bot.

              I also recommend Season 26 Episode 4: Deep Learning. In it, the kids start writing all their school essays with AI (and also all their romantic responses to girlfriends) while their teacher grades all the essays with AI. Then the school AI police start to investigate, and both the students and the teachers are terrified they’ll be found out.

      • ConsistentParadox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        AI psychosis is a real thing, and multiple people have committed suicide because of it.

        There are lawsuits against AI companies for those deaths.

        So yes, you can in fact “Claude yourself to death”.

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Aside from the AI subject just agreeing with you everytime, then not changing, is a form of fawning. It’s avoidant, it usually comes from a disorganized attachment style. I only bring this up because this isn’t really about AI it’s about her behavior around it and taking inventory on the relationship and each partners attachment style can help communication, understanding and decision making.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      A little understanding may help here - some people don’t think of the learning part here or long term. Something new is difficult and an LLM is easier.

      It’s not counterproductive if your goal is to complete whatever assignment.

      So a better approach might be helping the student focus on the longer term learning goal

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Below is one of the best sourced comments that I’ve seen about listing the negative aspects of LLMs/AI.

    One of my main ones is, thinking about spinning up a jet engine, next to someone’s backyard, each time a LLM is used for a web search.

    Stick to the facts when you explain your views, explore ways to run local models for her if you can stretch that far.


    Reasons not to use AI-LLM artificial intelligence. (There is probably a bunch more in the 7 months since this list was written.)

    https://lemmy.cafe/comment/16350045

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Have you explained to her why you’re against LLMs? How they work? This is how I got some of my friends to stop using ChatGPT or Character.ai

    When you peek behind the curtain and see these are just algorithms, at their core, they become a lot less impressive.

    If nothing else, at least push her to use Local AI models using something like ollama or odysseus or LMstudio. This helped get one other friend off AI because, guess what, running this on your own machine makes you feel the consequences of it.

  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    wife developed a tictoc/youtube habit but actually does many of the subjects she watches; gardening, cooking, sewing, etc. I can’t stand the snail’s pace of information from most videos and have to skip around. she also asks her phone AI for details like ‘how to plant tomatoes?’, which gives an acceptable answer, I guess. I’m RTFM old school and look up such things starting from an index. skip around a lot. I’ve tried asking questions but AI always misunderstands my questions, so I don’t use it. If she can make money working with an LLM, it will be okay. I wouldn’t want to be the first to operate any machine designed that way.

  • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yeah ignore it. Really if it bugs you that much I would do something about it, but that feels dramatic to me. But I’m not in your shoes and I don’t know your moral compass or how annoying this girlfriend is with her ai use. This is really a you issue though and I would not ask peoples advice, and if you wanted real advice I wouldn’t ask the anti ai space for one.

    I can tell you though, there’s tons of things I can tell you about my partner and what they do and how it bugs me. Every time they use our stove I say never put it above 6 just give it time. And everytime we Cook the stove is blasted on full.

    I could get up set and argue about it which I did for a short period of time. But clearly they aren’t going to change and I’m being obnoxious about it.

    That doesn’t mean i don’t love them, its just a balance of learning eachothers quirks and embracing them rather than making things more adversarial than it needs to be. But again I can’t draw those lines for you, you can’t ignore something that really bugs you. Really just talk to them about it.

  • majster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Eh you are overreacting. But one thing is crucial, is she using any proprietary software out of her own volition?

  • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unpopular opinion, but I think the degree to which AI doomerism plays out feels like Internet purity culture.

    Eating meat or non-fair trade coffee and chocolate is unethical, driving a car, buying electronics with slave labor mined rare earth metals all do active harm to the world.

    I feel like moderate AI use to save time isn’t a huge deal. Text generation is fairly cheap and not that harmful at small scale, if you’re running a swarm trying to solve millennium prizes that’s a much heavier lift.

    There is danger in missing out on learning and developing core instincts and judgement when you outsource some of that to AI, but asking it to find something in a disorganized readme or something like that isn’t a huge deal.

    • ducktumn@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      The issue is we humans are awful at drawing that line. You eat meat too much no big deal. Drink coffee 3 times a day it’s fine. Spend too much money on ethical chocolate it’s fine. But AI is different.

      Eventually there is a high probability of that moderate usage turning into frequent usage. If everyone used AI responsibly (like an advanced Google and sometimes grammar checks) it would be a great tool. But %99.9 people does not do that.

      • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Idk, part of being in a relationship with an adult is acknowledging their autonomy. Where is the line between having an active college social life and a drug or alcohol problem? Sometimes that’s clear cut sometimes not. If it starts affecting their academic life you can voice your concerns but if you’re not ok with how they respond including ignoring you, you have to choose between not bringing it up again or leaving.

        Maybe you also aren’t seeing the issue objectively either maybe the AI usage is being done responsibly and your GF is actually getting a real understanding of the material. I’m not saying I know everything, but might be worth considering if this is you externalizing your fears and concerns and this is maybe a legitimate difference in how both of you choose to engage with this technology.

      • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You eat meat too much no big deal.

        Do you not understand how harmful the factory farming of meat is to the environment? It’s orders of magnitude worse for the environment than data centres used for AI are.

        I understand that there are other considerations in the overuse of AI beyond just the environment, but downplaying how bad our species mass consumption of meat actually is, is a pretty shitty thing to do.

        A person “eating to much meat” isn’t “no big deal”

        • ducktumn@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Meat eating is not the bad part here. It’s the manufacturing of that said meat. We are animals and eating other animals is natural. Again the issue how we treat them and feed them.

          Also I meant “no big deal” for the person. As in health benefits or dangers. Of course meat industry is awful.

          • dusk@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Reading some of your comments I am surprised you are not pro ai, I’m starting to wonder if this is really about your supposed girlfriend.

              • dusk@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                You don’t want to think

                If your story is true, you already knew what you wanted to hear “Should I just ignore it?”

          • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            And the only realistic way to eat that meat is to get it from the manufacturers you numpty. They create the environment destroying supply to meet the astronomical demand. If everyone ate much less meat, the demand would go down and thus the manufacturers would create less supply.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Commenting just to reiterate what a lot of the other comments are saying. It’s ok if AI use is a dealbreaker for you, it would be for me. I personally have a list of companies I boycott and if my partner didn’t care enough to also boycott them then in my opinion we just wouldn’t align enough to stay together. That being said, you can also just decide that not using AI is important to you but you will tolerate it in a partner. My main advice if that’s the route you go would be to be clear that you don’t personally use it and draw clear boundaries. It’s ok to say for example “if you use AI for a project I’m not interested in reviewing/discussing it”. Maybe that’s a dealbreaker for her, I don’t know, but I’d just sit down with yourself and determine 1) if it’s a dealbreaker or not and 2) if it’s not a dealbreaker what your boundaries about it are. You just have to be ready for whatever her decision is regarding that. If you tell her it’s not a dealbreaker then you should just let it go. No one likes being nagged. But you also don’t have to support it, just be clear about that and keep consistent with whatever you said you were/weren’t going to do when she brings it up.

    Also, I think the comments calling you controlling are out of line. You can have preferences regarding your partners behavior. It only becomes controlling in very specific conditions. If you’re unclear about your desires and then retaliate against her without her knowing why that would be one way of being controlling. If you’re open and honest and communicate that you have a preference and are open to her response then you’re probably perfectly fine. The most important thing is clear communication and respecting each others boundaries.

    • Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Having a partner doing something that don’t align can definitely be hard to deal with. My fiance is the best person I know, I love everything about her, but sometimes she endorses the murder, rape, torture and breeding of animals for the sake of taste.

      To me it makes no sense, but I accept that we have different priorities. If I were to look down on all people that make different choices than me I would be lonely and I don’t think hanging out with vegans gives me better life quality than being with my friends and family.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    All I can tell you is that had I been you, I would have told her that her brain is every bit as beautiful as the rest of her, and that I’d hate to see that beauty eroded by her outsourcing her ability to think to a jumped-up Markov Chain.