Less women are in fields like electrical, plumbing, and construction which are harder to automate and more are in things like customer service and reception. I think she’s just saying things, but I can understand why someone may have said that.
Glad you got out of there and all things considered it seems like your love story is really sweet. Sending lots of positivity your way.
Every dollar spent on wars of aggression signal that my tax dollars aren’t that needed. They can apparently waste billions killing children, which to my knowledge is not a primary function of most governments, so how desperately do they need the money I send? That being said, I agree that in general taxes are needed and the rich don’t pay enough. It just makes me sad to know that although I can afford some changes in taxation, there are families out there that really can’t and the government isn’t tightening its belt in the areas needed and is just making things more expensive. We need less wars and more healthcare and education, yet our president is going around saying the exact opposite. Every person that has died in the war, every person that has died because of ICE, every person that has been stripped of house and food and life because of our military support of other nations is an indictment against the idea that anyone, rich or otherwise, need to pay more in taxes at the moment. I think that really affects people’s perception of how much they really need to be paying.
Yea, and I think some spelling mistakes in the article. Journalist don’t have the support they used to. I wonder if the writer had to source the image as well.
Really sorry that happened to you. I had a relatively similar experience, though I still believe children should have access to the internet as a whole. I had a home life that made the internet a place of refuge and people took advantage of that, but if it wasn’t via the internet it would’ve likely ended up much worse for me. I think part of the problem is what people consider “kids”. I would not give an 8yr old the entire internet, but by 12-13 I’d feel like access should be pretty wide. Mostly unsupervised but in a shared space. They have the freedom to explore, but an adult is around and could theoretically see what they were doing at any time. 14+ and I would still be talking to them about online safety, but not regularly checking in on them while they’re online. 16+ and it’s a free for all imho.
Though I had a lot of negative experiences online, the fact I had access to the whole internet meant I was able to independently explore topics I found interesting and really helped me understand myself better and learn so much about the world I never would have known. I grew up around racist religious republicans and as a queer kid I felt alone and confused. I like to think I would still be a good person without all the exposure to amazing people online, but boxing kids into their local social circle in their formative years just dooms some of them. I shudder to think of the kinds of things my less online cohort were doing. They should be able to see what’s out there. I think restricting children’s access to information because there are awful people online really centers the wrong thing. Basing this wide reaching policy on your experience is unfair and does nothing to address the actual problem. Children need better sex ed. They need to know it’s not “bad” to send nudes, but that the person they’re sending them to is a criminal and that person is the “bad” one. They need to have safe people to talk to. Parents need to have more time to spend with their kids. Laws like this are a bandaid and a bad one at that.
They just spun this org up last month. There are so many well established and well vetted organizations filing this exact niche that I can’t imagine this is anything but a grift. AI slop is the cherry on top.
Yes! I made a “coloring book”/“fashion” game that was just a horrible knockoff of a Barbie game I wanted but couldn’t warrant asking for, and it would be amazing to play again. I lack creativity so I basically just did Barbie game knockoffs, but I would love to see what other people did.
VB my beloved. The stupid games I made in VB rival even the most basic flash slop you ever saw. What a throwback.
The issue is that would impact Congress members that are actually fighting for the average American the most. Those Congress members would theoretically be elected due to grassroots support and are not trust fund babies that have wealthy donors able to keep them afloat. Your McConnells and pelosis could happily outlast the more progressive members.
I ended up skimming through the video. The title is a bit misleading. I’m always wary of people saying X is a scam when X is just a function of capitalism. Dental insurance has saved people I know thousands of dollars, even when compared to out of pocket or payment plans. Mine is a family plan and less than $20/mo/person (<240 a year per person) and covers two cleanings a year with no copay. That in itself is worth the price in my area as most places are >100 for out of pocket cleanings. It also covers X-rays and a bunch of other work I thankfully do not currently need, but my family has in the past taken advantage of without issue. Prices may be artificially inflated due to insurance companies or buyouts, but those are the prices regardless. The video is from an actual dentist apparently and goes into issues with insurance companies and at the end mentions some things places are doing to hopefully reign in greed, but the main issue is just that insurance companies are capitalistic. I would still recommend dental insurance if you’re able to afford it unless you have a location in your area where you know the out of pocket costs and have done the math.
I’m not acting any way about him. I haven’t called for his resignation or even an apology. I originally pointed out that having stayed in contact is not a valid defense against abuse. When you reiterated a concern regarding a similarity to the situation with Al Franken, I pointed out the ways in which this differed. You can disagree if you feel as though a CNN article that states text evidence was obtained has an equivalent journalistic value to a right wing radio station running with a story their host brought, but I was just pointing out how this situation differs.
It seemed to me like you felt you had to rush to his defense because of a letter in which he stated there was ongoing contact between them. I think wanting to see how things shake out is fine, but quoting his defense and comparing it to the Al Franken situation makes it seem like you think it’s a lie. That’s ok if that’s your perception and you’d like to share that, but it didn’t come across as “wait and see” it came across as a defense. Just my 2 cents on the matter.
Al Frankens main accuser was a republican trying to add to her star power and the story was first published by her republican radio station that openly admitted to not fact checking. The reporters here DID dig. It’s in the article. They saw texts, spoke to people who were told of the events at the time, and have medical records. This guy is being accused by people who used to work for him and are openly on the left. I understand wanting to wait for more information to come out or more to be corroborated, but it feels dismissive to compare this to the Al Franken situation regardless. This is being published by a reputable outlet and they seem to have a lot of people willing to back up these accounts with contemporaneous evidence.
To use the defensive letter saying “well you asked for a letter of recommendation” as evidence that this is at all like the Al Franken thing seems like a misunderstanding of who accused these people and of what.
People (not me), seemed to really like Thank Goodness You’re Here. Undertale is a popular one. Date Everything seemed funny from what I saw of it, and if playing with friends things like peak, baby steps, or getting over it. Lots of different genres there, but steam also has a tag for comedy games. Even if you don’t end up buying it on steam, you can always check that out in case you don’t get enough options via comments.
If you are aiming to work in politics, having a reference from someone in his position is likely going to get you further than a different reference would. Not only are they expected to leave but they also cannot even get a reference? I didn’t read the article because I cannot go through another one at the moment, but based on the excerpt, how is that a problem? To leave a job like that, especially abruptly and not have a reference from it would look very strange.
Gotcha, thank you. I was not sure if you just forgot to add the link or something. Appreciate you replying with some.
No please. Do not reward this kind of posting. People are just going to flood the fediverse with this kind of engagement farming. If they want to get eyes on their content they are welcome to post it in the relevant communities, ideally with a disclaimer that they made it.
Reddit was filled with posts like: “no one cares about my neurodivergent differently abled nieces art project 🥺👉👈”
Let’s not encourage that here.
Is there supposed to be an article link? I’m unable to see it if so.
They’re literally kidnapping people. Not even in the “hyperbolic” way. They have no authority to detain these people and are doing it anyway. That’s the definition. I hope for a real reckoning, though I fear they will never actually be held accountable.
Exactly this. There was a pretty infamous outage in 2024 and a couple smaller ones in 2023. I don’t think I know a single working adult that hasn’t had at least one payroll delay for some stupid reasoning. I helped someone troubleshoot an issue that caused all of peoples second paychecks to be delayed. During onboarding they’d tell people to expect a delay in their 2nd paycheck and people just never complained for years. Banking is such a fragile part of infrastructure. It’s strange to imagine someone quitting the second the paycheck didn’t hit their account. I’m anti capitalist as hell and companies are not your family etc etc, but at least make a phone call or something first.
Some of them, maybe, but certainly not all. Having all of your questions answered in one place in a conversational tone with something that not only does not ask questions but will often validate fantasies or imagined grievances is way worse. The friction of having to research things is often enough to dissuade people. Obviously getting the exact data is difficult, but there are several suicides that likely would have been prevented without ChatGPT, so I imagine there is a similar effect on murders.