Rapper Macklemore is a vocal supporter of Palestine and Gaza residents. During a recent concert at MetLife Stadium, he yelled “Free Palestine!” onstage, projected images of devastation in the area, and performed protest song “Hind’s Hall.”

Now, it seems that American venues are not willing to play ball with the Seattle artist, and he has been dropped from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour.

“After discussions with stakeholders, Macklemore will not be performing on the remaining support dates,” according to Messina Touring Group, the promoter of Loop Tour. This news follows backlash from organizations like StopAntisemitism and others, such as pop star Pink.

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve seen AJR in tour twice. Once in 2022 when they did their OK Orchestra Tour. There’s a song in there called “3 O’clock Things”. The lyrics at the end of the song are:

    Isn’t this obvious, am I insane? Let’s blame our parents ‘cause they taught us their ways Stay out of politics, stay on the fence Stay out of all of it to keep half your fans Isn’t this obvious, am I insane? There might be two side to everything that you say It’s all a bit cloudy, but there’s one thing I know That if you’re fucking racist then don’t come to my show.

    Then a breakdown and everyone in the crowd screamed that line.

    AJR is definitely not as big as Ed Sheeran, but they have been very open about supporting the left, performing at Joe Biden’s inauguration and refusing to go to Trump’s. I wish more artists had a backbone. It’s not like you’re going to be poor and broke. They have all the leverage. It would be so easy for them to make a change.

  • Hogrider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ed Sheeran here had a chance to be a hero to everyone who believes in humanity and human rights. He could have cancelled the tour for all the venues being explicitly pro-genocide and moved the concerts to other venues in the area. He would have made less money, yes. It would cost him a few fans, but he would’ve gained so many mlre. Instead he caved like a building built out of cotton candy in a short rain shower. And now I’ve sanitized my playlists from p!NK and Ed Sheeran music, these two have shown themselves to have no values. P!NK being the worst by far by actively picking the side of the oppressor. I’m done with her. Fuck Israel. Free Palestine one hundred times!

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      3 days ago

      According to Macklemore, Sheeran was told by venues to cut him, or cancel the whole tour. Sheeran tries to remain non-political as part of his brand. But it really feels like we’re up against the sad point where, if just saying “don’t genocide people” makes you “political”, then refusing to be political makes you a piece of shit.

      I think a lot of artists are still riding this line between staying safe and potentially nuking their entire career. I won’t act like that’s an easy decision for anyone to make, but obviously looking from the outside it’s easy to see what the right decision is.

      Time will tell. There’s still time for Ed to walk out on stage at his biggest show of the tour, throw a fist in the air, and say Free Palestine. I’ve had zero thoughts about him up until this point, but that would at least give me one shred of respect for him.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sheeran tries to remain non-political as part of his brand.

        Yeah that’s bullshit. And there’s no such thing as being “neutral”, you’re just choosing the side of the oppressor.

      • nothingcorporate@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s still time for Ed to walk out on stage at his biggest show of the tour, throw a fist in the air, and say Free Palestine.

        Honestly, this would flip the tables on the venues (ahem, LiveNation)…they’re ok throwing their weight around to get Macklemore dropped from tours, but Ed Sheeran is making them tens of millions of dollars…they would probably shut the fuck up if he did this.

        Adam Sandler: He’s not going to though
        Chris Farley: No, but you can imagine what it would be like if he did.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      135
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      “American Venues”

      Not sure who’s calling the shots here

      EDIT:

      The rapper alleges that Gillette Stadium owner Robert Kraft gave Sheeran an ultimatum.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        130
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nothing says “good guy” like compromising your principles for money, right? tf is your argument here?

        • neatchee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          69
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s likely not up to him as he has contractual obligations that could ruin more than just his own livelihood.

          The whole system is fucked. Rotten to the core

          EDIT: these replies are peak left self harm.

          Macklemore: free Palestine

          NFL Stadium Owners: drop Macklemore or we’ll cancel your show

          label and tour management: we can’t lose all these venues, so Macklemore has to go

          Lemmy community: how could Ed Sheeran do this??

          Like, how about we point our anger at the people actually causing the problem, instead of the guy trying to salvage his tour in a no-win situation because of racist fucks

          • OakTree@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            101
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ed Sheeran has an estimated net worth of around $350 million to $400 million

            Won’t somebody think of the millionaires? His whole livelihood is at stake here!

            • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              44
              ·
              3 days ago

              And it’s not like his livelihood is even at massive risk - he’s a big enough name that any arena worth his time to perform at will be big enough that there won’t be other acts available that will sell enough seats at short notice, so they’re pretty likely to cave if he puts his foot down.

              • BossDj@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                THIS is the part that gets me. Ed could have come at Kraft and the other venue owners and threw some hate to ticketmaster for good measure and probably come out fine

              • aski3252@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I don’t really care about him, but this line of thinking creates assumptions and expectations that are almost never going to be met. He is one of the wealthiest musicians, he isn’t just a performer, he is a businessman. If he was willing to risk or limit the success of his brand for his views (assuming his views are pro palestine), he probably wouldn’t be in the position he is in.

                At the end of the day, it is a mainly systemic issue, not an issue of moral failiure. Some individuals will push against the systemic currents, but this will always be the exception, not the rule.

                The only way to combat systemic issue is by changing/replacing the system through collective action, not individual action. Ed Sheeran chancling his tour in solidarity with Palestine would not stop western nations from supporting israel. The only way is a nations citizens collectively applying pressure.

                • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If becoming one of the world’s wealthiest musicians requires prioritisation of your brand over improving the world in ways you absolutely have the power to do, then becoming a wealthy musician is absolutely a sign of moral failure. It’s also not even necessarily detrimental to the brand to associate it with acting morally - that only made Dolly Parton more beloved.

                • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Macklemore did it, why can’t Sheeran do it too? Because he either doesn’t hold these views, or he likes money more. Simple.

                  You can even use the publicity of being cancelled to talk more about the issue. It’s not hard when you have a spine.

            • neatchee@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 days ago

              Did you not read the part where I said “more than his own livelihood”? Or did you just choose to ignore it?

              There are so many more people than just Ed Sheeran who would be hurt by him breaching his contract. Everyone working that tour would be hurt. Likely hundreds of people who are doing gig work for this tour.

              • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s so American: 100’s of Americans might lose their paycheck, so we can’t do anything to protest the 1000’s of non-Americans getting killed.

                • neatchee@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  please quote where I said “do nothing”.

                  because “don’t do this” is not the same as “do nothing”

              • Saeveo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Why would Ed Sheeran be breaching a contract if he hadn’t caved? The arena owners were threatening to refuse to let him play, they would have been them in breach of contract, not him.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Everyone working that tour would be hurt.

                Stop FUDing, they’d get another gig, it’s literally their job.

                • neatchee@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  yeah I mean who cares about people losing their jobs, you just go get another one, easy 🤡

            • 4am@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              And the truck & bus drivers, catering, roadies, grips, crew, wardrobe, sound guys. You think he puts in all the work himself?

              Listen I’m not defending Ed Sheeran’s decision here but don’t forget it’s not always about JUST his money - he personally knows a shitload of people who are going to lose their next 18 months’ income without much recourse if he bails now, who aren’t millionaires. Tour work is literally gig work.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 days ago

                And the truck & bus drivers, catering, roadies, grips, crew, wardrobe, sound guys. You think he puts in all the work himself?

                No. You think they only work for him?

              • neatchee@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yup. People seem to be ignoring the part where I specifically said “more than his own livelihood”.

                And this isn’t even touching on the impact to future contracts. Venues and other businesses don’t want to sign contracts with people who have shown a willingness to breach agreements for personal or political reasons.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                3 days ago

                It doesn’t even sound like it’s his decision. Seriously, how much agency do people really think musicians have over their performances, venues, lineups, etc.? That’s all handled by record labels, agents, managers, etc.

                If the venue says “not so-and-so” and the record label says “okay,” there’s literally jack-shit that the headliner can do about it…

          • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Is he responsible for his obligations if the stadium refuses him? Sounds to me like he would have made an effort to meet his contract, but someone else refused him.

            Honest question, I have no idea how these things work, but have a hard time believing Sheeran had no choice but to give in

            • neatchee@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Separate contracts. Sheeran’s contract and Macklemore’s contract are unlikely to be contingent on each other. Plus there are probably terms in the contract regarding conditions under which the venue is allowed to break the contract “for cause” which Macklemore’s situation likely breaches

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            I would tell the “system” to get bent. Ed Sheeran doesn’t have to do anything. It’s his tour, if they don’t want to allow him to perform over human rights, that’s on them.

            If this is true, I’m going to remove every Ed Sheeran song from my music library.

          • mHtt@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            good thing the earth is so tiny and most of the universe completely misses this shit.

            • X@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Okay, bear with me here but, if I’ve gotten this right (good probability I haven’t), if we divide the earth’s mass of ~6 x 1024 kg by the estimated total mass of the observable universe, ~3 x 1052 kg, Earth represents 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 00000000001% of the total mass of the observable universe.

              I’d say that effectively, though not technically, none of our absolute fuckery has any impact on Big Universe, if only by mass comparison. Thank fuck.

          • InnerElysium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because Ed could personally payout all of the staff working on the tour and cancel it. Because “Staying Neutral” is really just siding with oppressors. Because in a no-won situation you want to support the people who are currently being genocided and not venues paying you big bucks to keep quiet.

            You are right we should be calling out the people actually causing the problem, but Eds decision actively helps them continue causing said problem.

          • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            If the venue is giving him an ultimatum then he clearly has the agency to tell them no. Otherwise they would be executing the contract not making demands.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If Robert Kraft and the other stadium owners break tour contracts over a “we don’t like your opener” thing after they already signed, it’ll be huge fees and possibly a lawsuit. Ed Sheeran had leverage here and he didn’t use it.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          His record label had the leverage and chose not to use it. There’s very little say the artists themselves actually have in these kinds of things.

          • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            This isn’t some starving artist we’re talking about here. This guy already has more money than you’ll make in your entire life working an honest job.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            He already has a name, time to cut loose?
            All them big name artists could put their money where their mouth isn’t and build a venue, i’m sure it wouldn’t make Bono any poorer.

            • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is, actually not a bad idea. Someone send this to someone like Jack White. Get together a bunch of top musicians to actually fund the creation of a network of publicly owned venues. They can share resources and even pay artists real wages for performances. Call it a public option. Just needs the seed money

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              You realize their record labels hold all their IP, don’t you? So they cut loose and go indie and build a venue. What happens when their old label tells them they can’t play any of their music?

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Didn’t Taylor Swift have similar issues?
                I’m guessing bad publicity would be a deterrent for those labels. I guess poor ol’ Ed would have to create new stuff too.

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not like Macklemore has been quiet about his stance on Palestine. If it were a problem with Ed Sheeran, he probably wouldn’t have been on the tour in the first place.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah but Sheeran is willing to bend the knee to keep the tour going. A real one would apologize to fans and let it be known it’s the venue owners cancelling shows and why.

          It’s not like he’s some Indy act who won’t get more shows.

          • 4am@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ed Sheeran would never play the United States again if he pissed off Robert Kraft and the stadium owners (and LiveNation along with them).

            • fishy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Sometimes it’s about more than money. There’s plenty of non stadium venues he could still tour at.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Watch. If he had refused to go on without Macklemore, these guys would’ve said “oh the rich baby didn’t want to go on because Macklemore said Palestine” or some shit.

          Blame the rich fucks for their crimes; don’t invent new catch-22s to hang on them.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            If “these guys” you’re talking about are Zionists, then I don’t think he should care what kind of vitriol they try to brew up for him. In fact, pissing them off is often the correct stance.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      It seems like it’s the venues that won’t let Mackelmore play.

      “After discussions with stakeholders, Macklemore will not be performing on the remaining support dates,”

      From the tour promoters.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          He might be contractually obligated to with significant penalties if he drops. Without knowing the contract it’s hard to tell. He might not even be able to get out of it by doing what Mackelmore did.

          But it doesn’t look like he’s made a statement on it yet.

    • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      The articles made it seem like the venues forced Sheeran to drop macklemore. Sheeran may not have had a say.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        He could tell the venues if they wanted to cancel his opening acts, they could cancel his show, too. That would require someone to have principles, though. 🤷‍♂️

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        he can play somewhere else

        I realize that the state of touring venues is pretty fucked up, but someone with his sway is the only kind of person who can say “you know what, no, fuck you guys”

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        He sounds famous. I think he has some say. Of course so do venues, but I’d expect Ed Sheeran to have no problem finding other venues.

        My conclusion from this is that Ed Sheeran supports genocide and that Macklemore is cooler than I thought.

  • Stolas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Macklemore the goat!

    Been going back through and listening to a lot of rap from early 2010s, and I forgot how wonderful and outspoken a lot of them are. Lupe was speaking out against the bombings in gaza since Obama was in office.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      StopAntisemitism criticised the rapper, saying “Jewish fans bought tickets to see Ed Sheeran sing… not to be ambushed by Macklemore’s anti-Israel propaganda.”

      The next night, Macklemore returned to the same stage and directly addressed his “Jewish brothers and sisters” in the audience.

      “Criticism of Israel, criticism of apartheid, being against genocide, is in no way a criticism of you,”

      https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq0m3pkmgg1ko

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Given that the Palestinian people are Semitic people themselves, I would say that systematically destroying their lives, homes, and culture is more antisemitic than any combination of words that any person could ever string together.

      • statelesz@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are no “semitic people”. It’s a racist term coined by some German dude ages ago and it has no scientific value at all. Stop making antisemitism about Palestinians.

        • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is true, although, I’m not sure what you mean by that last part.

          The term anti-Semitic itself is racist as there are no people of “Shem”. The concept is a weird mashup of those native to the Levant and those who follow the Jewish religion or culture. Anti-Jewish would be a way better descriptor over antisemitic, but Zionists love the term antisemitic as it creates a false impression that their enthonational religious claims over the Levant are historically founded over the native Palestinian population.

          • statelesz@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s simply a term that’s historically developed because some German assholes called themselves “Antisemiten”. The term “racism” is equally flawed as it implies the existence of human races.

            • Un trop vert timide@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              From what I understand, that flaw can be lessened (not voided) by using sociology instead of eugenics/pseudobiology. So-called “races” as social constructs, or “perceived races” are less based on discrimination. This concepts can instead describe the existing discrimination. That does not nullify your point, by the way, it just dampens the flaw you pointed to.

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It also plays into the whole “the holocaust was so special that it may never be put in comparison to genocides we commit today or in the future”.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Ignorant comment. “Semitic people” is in the same intellectual genealogy as “Aryan people”, the terms were proposed as opposites. There are semitic languages and the term “aryan languages” is not entirely discredited (it appears as “Indo-Aryan” and refers to a subfamily of Indo-European languages). But nothing about any of this has to do with the existence of the Palestinian people and nation which is a political fact regardless of biological or linguistic lineages.

            • Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It all boils down to race talk eventually, no matter what intellectual gymnastics you perform. One label is as good as another in that game. Arabs learned well from Hilter’s ideas after WW2. Whether you want to discuss the “people of Palestine” or “the Palestinian People”, then Jews, Christians, Moslems, Turks, Babylonians (and their descendents…), Romans from the Italian peninsula, Greeks, Western Europeans from the middle ages… all must be considered in the mix and none excluded for any reason. All have either lived or owned/possessed the land for centuries, across various eras in history.

              • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                That’s a load of 19th century bullshit. The Palestinians are a People because they share a series of attributes (language, kinship, culture, common historical narratives and a shared political national project) and use those shared attributes to self identify as a People. That’s it, none of the other crap.

                • Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  and use those shared attributes to self identify as a People.

                  Go ahead, create your own delusional thought bubble and language that supports it.

                  if the rest of the world doesn’t see it your way then it still avails you nothing.

                  consider the example of ISIL for recent insights on how this will end for those who engage in creating imaginary worlds for themselves… inside of thought bubbles .

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Genetic testing has shown that the Palestinians are, by and large, Canaanites.

      They are by default a semitic people.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Stokeholders?

    The stakeholder has a name.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/macklemore-says-was-dropped-ed-sheeran-tour-patriots-owner-robert-kraf-rcna597736

    Macklemore has been dropped from Ed Sheeran’s tour after he says New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft organized a boycott among stadium owners over the rapper’s remarks in support of Palestinians.

    Awful nice of the corporate media outlet to hide the name of one side while blasting the other.

      • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        He was expecting to have his shit nepo child running the city of Boston and building him a stadium. Sine he obviously lost kraft needs to spend his free time doing something since his best buddy epstine isn’t around to keep him busy with unfettered access to poor people’s kids.

      • DrSoap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t know how they could plead not guilty when they have video footage of him getting tugged and blown on two separate occasions, they recorded his car and plate and did a ruse traffic stop on him to get him to provide his ID to an officer in the car

        • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          We live in a oligarchy and he’s a billionaire. Also the population has the working memory of a gnat and have no concept of boycotting anything. Especially if it could cause the slightest inconvenience.

        • urthoughtsrbad@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The cops were locked in 100% that it was trafficking until the billionaire was caught in the web then it was all misunderstandings and mistakes. And no, it’s not conspiracy that the ladies all got enough money to not talk. A fucking billionaire doesn’t go to jail because our society would rather lick their feet.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You won’t find them here on Lemmy lol

      That’s why I like this place so much. We’re all crazy and fight with each other all the time, but unlike other platforms like YouTube and Reddit, at least here we can all agree that human beings deserve basic rights! (for the most part lol)

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        at least here we can all agree that human beings deserve basic rights!

        until they reveal themselves to be a fascist, of course, for example by endorsing a democratic candidate for US president

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Free Speech” was only ever about screaming the N-word in the middle of your State Uni quad, while wearing your Red Cap and waving an American Flag.