• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I don’t want to spoil the joke (but I will) and I hate techno-optimist solutions that displace actual solutions for our biosphere: supposedly, Belgrade is such a dense concrete hell that trees aren’t viable solution (at least in the short term).

    There is some rumbling that liquid trees are not the solution to the real problems caused by large-scale deforestation, nor does it reduce erosion or enrich the soil. However, much of this wrath is misplaced as Liquid tree designers say that it was not made as a replacement for trees but was designed to work in areas where growing trees would be non-viable. Initiatives like Trillion Trees are laudable, but there is something to be said for the true utility of this tiny bioreactor. The fact that they can capture useful amounts of carbon dioxide from day one is another benefit for them. Such bioreactors are expected to become widespread in urban areas around the world as the planet battles rising carbon levels in the atmosphere.

    Source

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    If it’s actually more efficient then trees, could be a good idea. Saw a 51/49 video where he explained the urban development in the US requiring only male trees be planted leads to increased pollen levels and has made the “allergy season” 30+ days longer over the past 50 years or so.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I still want the trees outdoors, but this would be cool for indoor spaces. Each mall or parking lot could have a solar panel overhead and slime-tanks to produce useful byproducts.

      Maybe it could be mixed with and aquaculture like fish and sea plants to create cool scenery

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      While I would hate to lose actual trees, I’m medium on the idea of this on it’s own. People need lots of things and space, which causes the removal of trees. If we can replicate some of their functions, such as CO2 absorption with this tech, then that seems good. If upkeep is the same as a tree, I don’t see a downside to the overall concept.

      My thought would be that this shows up on top of the buildings instead of at ground level, though… Plant real trees and put these on the roof. The real loss would be if we stop making green spaces because these things meet the need for O2. Green spaces in cities do way more than just clean the air, though, so I’m not sure we’re that dystopian yet.

      The photo looks like it doubles as a bench too, so maybe that helps justify its footprint. Make them a mini-light show with varied colors and it can become a functional art installation. How long until it has spikes to prevent someone from taking a nap on it, though?

  • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I discovered when I joined a volunteer litter-picking group in my town that some people really hate trees. And I must emphasise HATE. They hate the shade they cast in summer, the way the leaves block the all-important View. They hate the fallen leaves in autumn. They hate the bare branches in winter. They hate the risk of branches falling in storms. They hate the racket the birds make. I was astonished - it never occurred to me that people would feel so strongly.

    Turns out I’m a bloody tree-hugging extremist.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah trees are assholes. They always ring my doorbell trying to sell me the book of Gaia. Constantly telling me “you can’t smoke here, sir”. There’s a tree behind my house who constantly wears the same glasses as me. Whenever I buy new ones, a day later this tree has the same. He’s constantly mocking me for no reason.

      I think all trees should be cut down and burned. Algae never complain, are always kind and always say “good day sir” when you walk by.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So many trees have destroyed people their houses with stupid forest fires. Have you ever heard of algae fires? No! Because algae aren’t assholes!

  • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    All these braindead silicon valley tech bros trynna reinvent existing solutions to problems in very expensive and unnecessary ways, marketing it as “revolutionary” and “groundbreaking”

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The majority of our oxygen comes from algae, they aren’t reinventing existing solutions they just put a tank of them in a city and blow air into it so that a city can use the same more efficient fauna that is available in coastal cities

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Green shit on your terrace, leaves fucking everywhere, looming threat of bird shit on your head, seeds everywhere, roots growing through everything, blocking the sun at every step, tough lessons in gravity for things kids climbing them, lot of damage when it’s stormy out.

    But nah trees are great, really.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Gray shit on your everything, concrete fucking everywhere, looming threat of 2-ton steel death machines caving in your head, overheating everywhere, asphalt plowing through everything, soaking up the sun at every step, tough lessons in momentum for kids crossing them, lot of traffic and pollution when there are drivers out.

      You could change half of your words, and keep the meaning the same, and make a compelling case that roads, or any other things, are humanity’s greatest scourge.

      If all you can do is complain that the natural world is insufficiently bent to your personal convenience, you are the problem with humanity right now.

      Go touch whatever remaining local flora people like you have allowed to continue to exist, and quit being an imbecilic bellend online.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      blocking the sun at every step

      That’s a feature. I don’t want to be grilled by the sun everywhere I go.

      Great for local air quality, too.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no, nature is getting in the way of…a civilization of bipedal animals that encroached on nature!

      It’s abhorrent!!

  • wildcardology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem with trees is they are used as lumber. The national parks has always been protected. But Trump has unprotected parts of the national parks to be cut down for lumber.

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      But the shade of a tree is far superior and reduces the overall temperature around them if many are planted, so overall much better.

      Also certain trees dont need deep roots and can grow without neccessairliy damaging the pavement.

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also really really hard to keep trees alive on the sides of buildings where these units could conceivably be used. Modular trees plus trees where we can fit them.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Insert random copypasta about biotech breakthrough that turns water and CO2 and nutrients into sustainable building materials which sounds like space age technology but it’s just trees

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    We should build a giant sky with fluorescent lighting 24/7. Think of how wonderful the city would be with constant bright fluorescents.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      There are algae in the ocean. The problem with ocean algae is not that they aren’t there, but that their requirements (sunlight, oxygen, acidity, temperature, etc.) prevent them from expanding any further.

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If we put the algae in the oceans, then sink all of our cities underwater, all of our problems will be solved.

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dumb take. If someone crashes their car into one of these, it can be replaced in a few days. Trees take decades to grow in ideal conditions. Between tall buildings in a city is far from ideal conditions.

    Also algae is way more efficient at converting CO2 into O2; I think it’s maybe multiple times more efficient using the same amount of light.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As an emergency responder, I can say with confidence that when a car hits a tree, it’s rare that the car wins. The tree usually just shrugs it off.

      • HATEFISH@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Emergency responder in a big city? Trees will fuck up a car no doubt but not usually the tiny ones lining the streets of major urban centers, most I see get to be maybe 5 in across. But it may all be location dependant.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          Yes. Even a 50mm (2 inches) tree trunk will usually win against a car on urban roads.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dumb take, by the guy who has no idea how much it costs to maintain these tanks or any understanding of the scales involved, all while wanting to live in a world of green goo in tanks instead of one with trees in their cities.