• Antti@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People looking for another European alternative, check SailfishOS! Jolla supports their devices long time and SailfishOS is truly alternative OS made in Europe

  • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bought a fp 5 lately. It’s a quality nightmare. Has a bug regarding ‘fluid in usb port’ error message. Consequence: phone does not charge. Phone is brand new. Google the bug. Turns out a hundreds of other users reported the bug already 9 months back via fp user forum. Nothing has happened. They just let it rot.

    Sent it to repair. Got it back with the same bug again. Have had all fp models in the past. Was okay happy, but my fp journey ends here. I think the company has serious problems.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fairphones are almost certainly less profitable than their Apple/Pixel competitors.

    But a big chunk of that cost is coming from advertising. Another big chunk is stock buybacks. There’s so much fat to cut before you actually get to hardware/software quality.

  • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fairphones have a worse record than any other phone I ever owned in regards to sustainability for me. The phones become unusable as soon as the new model releases due to their non existing software quality, and it seems that they just stop bothering with tests for their previous models. I bought the Fairphone 4 for myself and the Fairphone 5 for my mother and both had software issues without end. In both cases the ability to make and receive phone calls broke after an android update. Imagine not being able to call emergency services because of a software update. Imagine dying because the developers at Fairphone didn’t bother to test their shit. That is not even mentioning that security updates were also always months late. I truly wanted to like them but I couldn’t be bothered with these broken phones anymore and bought a refurbished Pixel, for not even half the price of a Fairphone, and flashed it with GrapheneOS instead.

    • pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Also the best path for sustainability is to NOT BUY A NEW PHONE EVERY 2-3 YEARS.

      Don’t buy fairphone. Try to run your current phone for 7 more years.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I use my phones until they start crashing due to battery issues.

        Tends to be about 6 years for that to happen, at least with the mid range phones I tend to buy.

        My Nexus 4 did not survive an intense summer of Pokemon Go, and my Huawei Honor whatever number it was eventually would die just from opening the camera. I’d get the batteries replaced, but by the time they die I’m feeling the age of them even more than in my knees.

        • jnod4@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think you can change some batteries. Managed to change a pixel’s battery by myself using a hair drier.

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Me and my family just changed like 3 phone batteries for fucking change. Local shop charges 50RON (Ro) (10 EUR) per battery change WITH LABOR. New batteries installed. All reporting 101% in Accubattery, from 60-70% before. Can you guys not get cheap battery replacements?

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree and that was the reason I initially chose a Fairphone but the promised 7 years of security updates also turned out to be a half-truth, after three years I only got quarterly security updates. I tolerated four years of buggy software the update that broke the phone part of my smartphone was just the last nail in the coffin.

        • pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve also heard (too lazy to look up a source) but they don’t make their phone entirely “fairly” either, because apparently like with chocolates it is just very difficult to do without having exploitation be a part of your logistics chain and still make a feasible product.

          Citation needed^

          And to be fair, at least they are trying.

      • ganryuu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Only if you still get security updates for those 7 years, which is I think the case with the Pixels, and some Samsung flagships, but is very far from being the norm. You don’t want a non-updated phone.

        Edit: of course that also works if you can switch to an alternate rom that does receive the updates.

          • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            not necessarily. Plenty of exploits do not rely on links or downloads, and there’s a whole class of “zero-click” exploits. Usually, such critical vulnerabilities are quickly patched. But after a system stops receiving updates, they can add up.

      • cenzorrll@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d love to, but manufacturers are complete shit at supporting phones. Most don’t get security updates after 3 years.

      • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is probably the main point - not buying a new phone when the manufacturers release a new model.

        I would add though that Fairphone are also improving the entire industry by not using cheap labour, paying fair wages and not using conflict materials, so there is more to this than just eWaste

        But, I agree don’t scrap existing phones just to buy another - even if it is Fairphone

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Try to run your current phone for 7 more years.

        Isn’t the entire appeal of Fairphone that its modular and easy to repair?

        I can’t extend my OnePlus for another 7 years because the charging port is flaky and the battery is burning out. The ringer switch is busted, so I can’t take my phone off silent. The camera’s focus is always a bit off. I can’t disassemble and fix the parts that are broken while keeping the bits that still work without getting a fucking engineering degree.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Imagine dying

      I gotta say, you had me until you cranked it to 11.

      Not being able to call with a phone after an OS update is definitely a deal breaker. But “if I don’t have my phone on me, I’ll die” is the kind of hyperbole that has me doubt your entire testimonial.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Imagine dying wasn’t hyperbole it is a real concern of mine. I commute with a bicycle to work and also cycle a lot in my free time. I wouldn’t be the first cyclist injured or even killed in a hit and run accident, so a phone that is unable to make a emergency call when I need it is not something I am willing to risk.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It was referring to not being able to call emergency services, which may realistically lead to your death. It’s a fairly unlikely scenario, but not a completely crazy one. It’s just a highlight in a sea of issues. Or at least that’s how it looks to me, as I’ve never used a Fairphone. Some people say they work flawlessly.

    • Culf@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      For me Fairphone has been good. I bought my fp3 on release in 2019 for about 400 euro and it is still going strong today, 6 years later (I am in fact using it right now)

      Not to say that there haven’t been software problems at all but it has not been that bad and was fixed over time.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the idea is that you can make them but the large manufacturers actively choose not to, because being anti-consumer, anti-sustainability, and anti-repair is not a problem in their business model, it’s a core strategy of it.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well not if larger manufacturers made them I guess? Fairphone just doesn’t get the same prices even from the same vendors, if there’s any that overlap between say them and Samsung.

    • fading_person@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every time someone mentions the headphone jack, comes a legion of people defending the corporations. People will really accept anything they do and bully the ones who don’t want to submit. That’s impressive! And we’re in a place with higher-than-average corporation haters.

      It’s even more impressive when we think about how Bluetooth earphone users don’t gain anything by removing the jack, neither lose anything by keeping it. It literally doesn’t affect them, but heavily affects anyone who uses wired phones or other stuff. People simply use their energy against others, in favor of corporations for absolutely no benefits for them, but simply for fucking the other people. I can’t understand this behavior.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The GD phone is modular and repairable. How TF did they manage not to make the jack at least an option?

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        People will really accept anything they do and bully the ones who don’t want to submit. That’s impressive! And we’re in a place with higher-than-average corporation haters.

        I don’t see it that way at all. Would I personally like to see the headphone jack return? Sure. But there are about 5,002 more important issues when it comes to tech corporations (Ie. privacy, repairability, software support, obsolescence, etc… just to name a few). People aren’t defending corporations as much as they are “picking their battles”.

        Your headphone jack battle is inconsequential and frankly kind of stupid in the larger scheme of the war right now. Would it be great to get to a point where all the battles are won and all we have to worry about is a damn headphone jack? Absolutely. But we’re not there.

        • fading_person@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          So, are people picking their battles by practically bullying others into thinking they’re wrong and outdated? They could simply ignore people talking about phone jacks, but they don’t. They’re not picking battles. They’re actively fighting, and on the corps’ side.

          Also, there’s always a bigger battle. If we think like this, no one will ever do anything. Corporations don’t go all in. They take things away from us one small step at a time, and people allow it, because they’re always small things, but just like boiling frogs, we will end up into a cyberpunk era.

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The more you ignore the smallest bad changes , the more they will be confident to ruin all the bigger issues you mentionned

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s been long time that i didn’t use wired one but i have a problem of removing stuffs just because the majority of people no longer use it. Wired one still have 34% marketshare which is still a lot of people

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Are we not well past a point where the Fairphone 6’s DAC for the 3.5 mm jack would be better for audio quality than Bluetooth 5.4 with aptX Adaptive/LDAC? When headphone jacks were being removed from phones around the mid-2010s, it was ridiculous, greedy, and premature. Now, though? I find wireless earbuds vastly nicer and more convenient for phones, and I would only go with wired, say, on a vacation where I can use a cheap $20 junk drawer pair and not mourn them if they get lost somewhere – at which point I can just use a dongle for a weekend or whatever.

      I still always want a microSD card slot, but I’d prefer that my phone not have a headphone jack at this point. I think the people who still mourn the loss of the 3.5 mm jack are a vastly smaller minority than they think they are. Which is fine; you’re still welcome as a consumer to buy or not buy a phone based off that. But I also think that nagging Fairphone over the removal of the 3.5 mm jack with the Fairphone 4 in 2021 is “old man yelling at clouds” territory.

      • DPEWGF@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pushing wireless has been frustrating to me because of the fact that the batteries inside those tools will die sooner or later. Majority of the time, I am fine with being wired. The good news is that IEMs have evolved a lot over the past decade with great options even at $20 that include detachable cables from the earbuds. What’s even cooler is that you can choose for your audio connectivity to be USB-C for those that miss the 3.5mm jack. I’ll provide a $20 example below:

        https://hangout.audio/products/tangzu-waner-sg-2?variant=41999443132464

        • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I switched to IEM’s with a Bluetooth DAC after someone stole my brand new galaxy buds.

          It looks dated by today’s standards so people don’t want to steal it. Funny though because this setup is way better quality.

      • Pazintach@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        For me, I already have very good headphones from years ago, and they are all working. I don’t want to buy additional Bluetooth headphones just for a Smartphone. Why do I have to buy additional gears just to be able to use my perfectly functional old ones? Or do I have to accept that Smartphones nowadays are just not for music?

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I don’t want to buy additional Bluetooth headphones just for a smartphone.

          You don’t have to. You can still use a USB-C dongle. Phones in 2025 have considerably longer battery life and charge considerably faster than phones when manufacturers started phasing out 3.5 mm jacks in phones, so charging should rarely conflict – unless you’re frequently doing wired data transfers too. A dongle is about $20. You’re also entirely free to get a smartphone that still has the jack if it’s an important feature to you. As I said in my above comment, nobody’s saying you aren’t allowed to factor this into your purchase.

          Why do I have to buy additional gears just to be able to use my perfectly usable old ones?

          “Why do I need an external optical drive to read DVDs on my laptop? Why can’t they just build it into the device?”

          A 3.5 mm jack is just more stuff that needs to go into the limited thickness of a smartphone. They also need to be made water-resistant, and it’s just another potential point of failure. And for those who don’t use them, they’re a useless lint trap. Overall, they just cost more to produce which puts more cost onto the consumer. And now that Bluetooth audio is so widely used because it’s no longer complete trash, the vast majority of users not using the 3.5 mm jack would end up subsidizing the very small minority that do.

          Or do I have to accept that Smartphones nowadays are just not for music?

          No, you definitely don’t. Like what? Wirelessly they’re better than they’ve ever been by a mile. If you care deeply enough about audio quality that even modern Bluetooth quality bothers you, your alternative isn’t 3.5 mm – it’s an external DAC via USB-C. Space and streaming bandwidth are basically no longer considerations for high-bitrate music. If you care about music, smartphones are in a much better position than they were when the 3.5 mm jack was thriving.

          “Smartphones nowadays are not for music” is such a histrionic distortion of “I personally have to use a $20 dongle when I listen to music on my smartphone with the headphones I alreay own.”

          • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            A 3.5 mm jack is just more stuff that needs to go into the limited thickness of a smartphone. They also need to be made water-resistant, and it’s just another potential point of failure. And for those who don’t use them, they’re a useless lint trap. Overall, they just cost more to produce which puts more cost onto the consumer.

            Thus is straight up a lie. They cost less than a dollar to buy and put in a phone. Even the thinnest iPhone could have one without it impacting space and finally they are just as easy to waterproof as usb c port.

            But yeah keep regurgitating the same facts big companies want you to use cause a extremely backwards compatible analog audio standard is less “convenient”

          • Pazintach@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            What I mean by listening to music on the phone is, listening to lossless files from the phone’s internal storage using my old JBL or Sony. Even if wirless are better now a days, what if my old headphones are not bad too? A new Bluetooth headphone of the same quality cost a fortune too. Of course there are Smartphones still has the 3.5mm jack, like my current Sony. Or a USB-C adapter is the only way to go in the future? The problem is, why take people’s options away if you don’t care about ultra thin thickness? Fairphones themselves are not thin either.

            And DAC is simply a different thing. If listening from home, there are different set ups for that with speakers. And my home sound systems are even older. They are not consumer products that you throw away every five years.

          • voltaa@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can only use the USB-C dongle for as long as your USB-C port functions, which for my last 3 phones including the one I’m typing this on, isn’t for the life of the phone. So once that fails which it always does, how do I listen to music? I shouldn’t be forced to use Bluetooth headphones/earbuds when they are objectively worse options that the collection of wired headphones I’ve gotten over the years. What about when the phone manufacturers decide that contact charging is good enough now and remove your USB-C ports, where does the dongle go now?

            Your point about optical drives on computers is fucking dumb, since computers are still 100% modular and customizable, the point is that phones are not. I CAN put an optical drive on my PC, I can’t put a 3.5mm jack on my phone.

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              (Different guy here) the same thing applies to 3.5mm jacks. I also the “slippery slope” argument on USB-C ports feels a bit premature, though I’ll never 100% say that a CEO wouldn’t ever do anything like that.

              Their point about optical drives literally said the word “laptop” and no, laptops are not modular to the point where you can just slap any old disc-drive in them. You can, however, get an external one that will take a USB slot but you’ll live. It’s going to be hard to successfully argue against the other guy if you’re not even reading his comments properly.

              • voltaa@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I read the comments properly. Laptops are modular where you can slap any old disc drive in them, I have one in my basement right now where I can do exactly that. If I couldn’t swap it easily without taking apart the laptop, I can easily open the laptop and attach it to the board as well, something that I can’t do with modern locked tight phones without specialized tools. Last resort would be using USB and an external drive. Tech literacy is dead when people are arguing against having a 3.5mm jack and don’t know that you can open a laptop with a screwdriver.

                • Soup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  When was the last time you saw an even semi-modern laptop? There’s no space to jam disc-drives in them and you’d have to cut the body for the slot if there was no option to switch out part of it for something that had one. I frickin’ love modifying stuff and tinkering but that’s just not a reasonable expectation to have for everyone.

                  I am aware of how to open a laptop, I even have all the bits to do it, I’m just not living in the early 2000s and understand that my needs and how I use stuff are not the only valid ways.

                  Yes, tech literacy had a small window and now we’re all dumb again but I don’t think it’s why you think it is.

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You can only use the USB-C dongle for as long as your USB-C port functions

              Sure. At that point, you have bigger issues than the headphones, and your phone is probably very well past its natural lifespan, but sure.

              which for my last 3 phones including the one I’m typing this on, isn’t for the life of the phone.

              ??? Holy shit what? I had a phone with a micro-USB port that lasted nine years, and the plastic power button failed before the port did. My current USB-C port shows absolutely no signs of wear after nearly three years. USB-C is generally sturdier because it’s symmetrical, a bit thicker, and lacks sharp corners.

              Dude, I’m sorry, USB-C phones started showing up in like 2015; generously, that’s about three years per phone. I don’t know if you just needed to clean the port and didn’t realize, but at some point that stops being bad luck or poor manufacturing and starts looking like user error.

              So once that fails which it always does, how do I listen to music?

              Bluetooth headphones until you get a new phone? Again, nobody said you can’t buy a phone with a 3.5 mm jack. If your use case is that you’re chronically negligent with your USB-C ports, then go off, king. But nobody’s going to consider this a half-decent argument for bringing it back to most phones.

              I shouldn’t be forced to use Bluetooth headphones/earbuds when they are objectively worse options that the collection of wired headphones I’ve gotten over the years.

              Okay, again, if you care about audio quality so much that the Bluetooth standard is your bottleneck, you’re using an external DAC plugged into the USB-C port anyway, not whatever DAC the manufacturer decided to throw in for the 3.5 mm port. Wired headphones are better than wireless at the high end, but that’s also when you’re not sending the audio through a generic smartphone DAC.

              What about when the phone manufacturers decide that contact charging is good enough now and remove your USB-C ports, where does the dongle go now?

              “What about this scenario that I made up in my head just now? What then?? How will I be able to select my audio playlist when the corporations take away the phone’s display and project it into my retinas with Bluetooth, liberals??”

              Your point about optical drives on computers [sic] is fucking dumb, since computers are still 100% modular and customizable

              Yeah, sure, I’ll just build an optical drive into my laptop whose bottom chassis is thinner than my smartphone. Wait until the engineers at Lenovo see how far I’ve pushed optical drive technology so I can watch Shrek 2 with director’s commentary while I check my email.

              the point is that phones are not. I CAN put an optical drive on my PC, I can’t put a 3.5mm jack on my phone.

              I can fit an optical drive into my laptop about as well as you can fit a 3.5 mm jack into your phone (but actually, it’d be easier for you). Your comment below talking about “unscrewing a laptop”… Hi, yeah, I do that all the time. The fact that you not only can’t see the giant problems with trying this but also equate installing an optical drive inside of a generic laptop that was never meant to have one with being able to pop open the lid is so egregiously fucking stupid that I don’t know how/if to entertain it.

              I can honestly see how you broke your phone’s USB-C port three times in a row if this is how you understand technology.

              • voltaa@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                What would you consider a natural lifespan for a phone? I’m currently using a Pixel 6 that I got in 2021, it’s still well within it’s 8 year lifespan (which is around what I would call reasonable for something that costs me $800) and the USB-C broke at around late year 2 early year 3. It’s been the same issue with each phone of the USB-C getting loose and eventually failing to charge. As for your point about the micro USB port outlasting the button, same vibe those ports were indestructible, this is an issue that has only come up and consistently come up when phones started switching to type C. My blackberry bold is still kicking and usable so you can call “user error” all you want but I’m not convinced I suddenly became bad at maintaining my phones suddenly when the port swapped.

                So I’m supposed to solve the issue of not wanting bluetooth headphones by…using bluetooth headphones? For five years while I wait for my phones natural lifespan to pass? K. Like yes I get the audio quality argument, you’re going to use a DAC anyways as I do on my desktop, but having the possibility of my headphones dying on me, as well as the price to performance when compared with wired options is enough for me to not want to deal with it. Sure I can get 100$ bluetooth buds, but they’re going to not only not be high quality, they’ll sound like shit at best.

                The “scenario I made up in my head” is coming in the next few years, guaranteed. I remember when “the 3.5mm jack is going away” was a stupid argument that wasn’t going to happen too.

                Just like I can buy a phone with a 3.5mm jack (with increasingly limited options for that each year) that isn’t my only criteria when buying a phone, it’s about weighing pros and cons of it. Sure you can’t fit an optical drive in your razor thin Lenovo, but you have options to buy a laptop that can, it all depends if you’re priority is buying something functional or something pretty.

                You’re probably right though, it’s on me for having a broken port on the only piece of tech that I can’t easily open and tinker with, I just don’t understand technology.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Idgaf about audio quality. I don’t have to charge wired headphones and the port is designed to spin unlike a dumbass dongle plugged into a USB c port. Let alone the environmental considerations.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Idgaf about audio quality.

          Valid. Back in the mid-2010s, it was a prominent (and very strong) argument against removing the jack.

          I don’t have to charge wired headphones

          Also valid, although even budget wireless earbuds advertise 24+ hours of battery life. Mine advertise 30, and after over a year of usage, I’d say they get me through an entire day of uninterrupted moderate usage (no going back in the case) no problem. The case usually has a few full earbud charges and charges them very quickly, and at least my case charges via USB-C or wirelessly and doesn’t take long.

          It’s less of an interruption and more of a fixed, very small factor in a nightly or binightly routine. Realistically, the lifespan of a baked-in lithium-ion battery is a headache, but to me, the battery life never has been. It can’t beat no charging, but having to recharge the earbuds is something I’m barely even cognizant of.

          and the port is designed to spin unlike a dumbass dongle plugged into a USB c port.

          I’m trying to remember the last time I had to readjust the rotation of a headphone cable on the bottom of the phone (top of the phone definitely sometimes, though). If you really need to, the tip of the cable can still be rotated inside the dongle. I can’t imagine this being an actual problem unless your use case is as a fidget toy.

          Let alone the environmental considerations.

          Shipping an audio jack that 95%+ of users will not ever touch with every phone sounds at least as environmentally unfriendly as the rare purchase of a 3.5 mm-to-USB-C dongle. The environmental consideration of the baked-in lithium-ion battery is definitely worse, but you also don’t have to use that or the dongle; good wired earbuds/headphones with a USB-C cable exist.

          It’s again totally your choice to factor the jack into what phone you buy, but the jack is and will remain dead in the mainstream – now finally with decent reason – and no amount of being a vocal minority to Fairphone about how it’s too hard to spin your headphone cable is likely to change that.

          • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m very likely the minority, but the reason I still have a phone with jack is that my custom mold in-ear, well… is wired (I’m a musician).

            I don’t want to use a different headphone for hearing music, as this is a really good monitor (actually I think it has cost me 10x as much as the used phone I’m driving it with (LG V30)). An external DAC is annoying, as this for one drains the battery pretty heavily and - fewer adapters less worries…

            There’s other reasons why you don’t want to use bluetooth, namely latency, although probably less important, for applications where this is really relevant, you would use a dedicated audio interface anyways… Or well, just the fact that I know of a few people already that they lost their bud(s), quite a bit more difficult if everything is wired together.

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Now, though? I find wireless earbuds vastly nicer and more convenient for phones

        Love the fact their tiny, non-replaceable lithium batteries means they’re quite literally disposable products you’ll have to keep buying and throwing away.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            To me anyway, that’s basically a non-factor these days:

            • From the factory, phones generally have much longer battery lives than when 3.5 mm jacks thrived. For example (bit of an outlier), my S23 Ultra lasts me two days from 80%. And speaking of that, the battery life capacity over time is less bad now thanks to e.g. techniques like stopping charging early.
            • Phones charge much faster now than, again, when 3.5 mm jacks thrived. 10 minutes of charging could easily last me through several hours.
            • Wireless charging is a standard feature of modern smartphones, and it’s even decently fast (I’ve usually seen 15W).

            So to me anyway, this conflict would arise and be frustrating in the case that: “Oh shit, I used my phone like crazy yesterday and forgot to charge it overnight. It’s so dire that I need to charge it now when I want to listen to something, and for some reason I can’t 1) just charge it wirelessly, 2) listen without headphones for 10-ish minutes, 3) listen on another device if I’m using/near one, or 4) go find something to do other than listen to music on my phone for the 10 minutes it takes my phone to charge another 20%.”

            TL;DR: If you’re absent-minded as hell, chronically on your phone listening to music etc., unwilling to think even slightly outside the box, and impatient to the level of a small child, then USB-C headphones will be a devastating downgrade.

            • Akasazh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I like to listen to podcasts in bed, often falling asleep during. Therefore wireless ones are not feasible as they get lost.

              I like to be able to charge my phone at the same time, as it’s a long period where I don’t use the thing and it’s in one place.

              Could this be solved attentively? Sure, but changing the thing that is perfectly fine will force me to change my routine, against which I’m naturally hesitant.

              • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Yeah, unless your headphone cable is very short and/or the nearest hard, flat surface is very far, I don’t see any reason why wireless charging couldn’t work as an out-of-the-box solution for this. Some phones nowadays even take 25W wirelessly, which is insane, but the seemingly standard 15W will still trivially top you off overnight.

                We’ll take a worst-case scenario where you have an Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (5800 mAh; very high), a 15W wireless charger, a phone that we’ll just call dead and assume you’re still listening to podcasts somehow for simplicity, you’re not capping at e.g. 80% to protect the battery, and you’re getting five hours of sleep because you were up watching a 3-hour alt history video essay theorizing what the Anglo-Zanzibar War would’ve looked like if both sides had nukes.

                You’re talking basically like 30 Wh. So when you wake up in the middle of the night three hours later from chronic insomnia, your phone’s fully charged and there to tempt you away from falling back asleep.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Therefore wireless ones are not feasible as they get lost.

                Samsung earbuds have a detection mode; you can make them make a noise if they’re out of the case, and GPS will tell you the address if you forget them somewhere.

                They don’t help you if you left them inside the case in your house, but don’t know where.

                • Akasazh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  It’s not that they cannot be found, when I want to turn over on my other side, I want to switch buds, with the wired ones they are connected and I can find them blindly.

                  My spouse won’t appreciate me hunting after beeping things in the middle of the night.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of it is also economies of scale and full control of the supply chain. The unethical behavior is to squeeze as much profit as possible.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Each new Fairphone is increasingly more custom whereas the first ones used more stock parts. When you order elections from China, manufacturers might refuse to make custom parts for a small room, or charge a lot for it.

    • kepix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      cause its marketed towards richer westeners who cant even unlock a phone

    • DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Came from Pixel 6 and picked up a fairphone 6 last week. The camera is sadly not as good but everything else is great (so far).

        • Crazazy [hey hi! :D]@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Essentially what it comes down to is that I cant put a custom ROM (so not Google’s version of Android) on my HMD phone, which is unfortunate because that means I’ll only be able to have “verified” apps on my phone in the (near) future

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Next two years is gonna decide if custom ROMs even survive…

            GrapheneOS gonna need all support they can get.

            Otherwise, it will be a long slog to get to something similar with Linux based phones

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I like the look of the fairphone 6. I like the look of having screws on the back, like a more industrial/mechanical design language (sharper edges, etc…) But I can’t justify that kind of money for a phone, no matter how much I may want to.

    • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can see I’m being down voted so let me explain in more detail. There is a serious problem in the industry where failure rates are not being considered in regards to how environmentally sound a device is. Some manufacturers have historically very low failure rates and while others are very high.

      There needs to be a lot more visibility of this as a high repair rate will absolutely kill any positive environmental impact these phones have. So tell us what you’re repair rates are.

      Of course, if you genuinely want to help the environment stop getting new phones or buy secondhand.

      • verdi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The phone is repairable and parts are mostly user replaceable, that’s why you are being downvoted. Sustainability starts with making sure you support the device with software and parts over time, not just ethical sourcing.

        The main problem, consistently is the battery and fairphone makes it fully user replaceable. It sure as shit is much better than just exchanging the device or charging so much for repairs that it’s equal/cheaper for the user to get a new one(*cough Apple, Samsung…).