I recently saw Star Trek Picard, the first season was okey, season 2 was awful, the season 3 was nice.

Acording some critics last Discovery season is bad, so now I’m afraid of looking a series who has a bad ending, it worth to watch or is as painful as Picard Season 2? Or I should watch Strange New Worlds and Enterprise instead?

  • bgainor@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Star Trek Discovery is not “that bad”. Like Picard and some of the seasons of Enterprise, each season is a self-contained story arc, which I get is not for everyone. It also has a black female main character, which apparently is also not for everyone. IMO, the fifth season was not quite as good as the first four (I actually like the fourth the best), but there was still a lot to like. I do think they did better after they moved to the 31st century so they weren’t as constrained by canon gymnastics. It also (for a single season) gives us our only non-human main ship captain to-date, which I think is a good thing in a series centered on the idea of friendship with other worlds. There are definitely things I would change about the show if I could, but on the whole I think it’s a great addition to Trek.

    (Also, Michelle Yeoh, Mary Wiseman, and Tig Notaro each steal every single scene any of them is in. Worth watching for those three alone.)

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I watched all of Discovery. It’s different, a bit too touchy-feely at times for me. But, the stories are interesting and wild.

    OTH, I liked all of Picard, so maybe you shouldn’t take my view into account.

  • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    i think this clip really highlights all the issues i had with discovery.

    kinda poor acting, cringe ass dialogue, boring and bland music, self aggrandisement, and too many obvious cgi ‘set pieces’.

    new trek is action oriented space opera, not hard scifi morality tales. ig its just not for me

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I absolutely loved that look for the Klingons. I was so sad to see it meekly watered down in later episodes. It’s what they should have done in The Motion Picture!

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Most any criticism of the show is true. I will say that it is a good series to watch with people who haven’t watched Star Trek before because it is a little un-Trek-ish and there is less to stop and explain. Also, since the mission is top secret it has little overlap with anything except SNW.

    As a Star Trek fan, I was happy to get more Trek, the same as I was happy to get more Picard (that S2 was a pain though!), Lower Decks, Prodigy, and even the Short Treks.

    My wife was pulled into the world of Star Trek by Discovery (a full 36 years after I’d started watching the franchise) and now she loves it and wants to watch all of the other series. So, Discovery gets a point for that.

    (I haven’t seen Section 31 yet. It is supposed to be very bad.)

  • Skunk@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Discovery is fine and at the time it was the only modern Trek we had so there’s that, it’s enough for me to like it.

    The only problem I had with it is that every season is “OMG we have to save the all fucking universe!”, other than that it’s cool.

    Then we had Strange New Worlds so my thirst for “let’s just explore that funny planet and have a drink at the mess” Trek was satisfied.

    I still watch discovery because ‘spaceships goes piou piou piou eat my phaser’ and that’s what I want it to be.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I really liked parts of it…from themes to characters…but found it really hard to sit through, most of the time. They had a really annoying way of rehashing everything that happened, after-the-fact…as if we needed to be constantly reminded about details that were literally from ten minutes ago.

    It reminded me of the dialogue formats used in cheesy Mexican telenovelas. You can’t mention someone’s name, without also including a brief description of who they are related to, and what they’ve previously done. No one talks like that in real life. Especially when the person you’re talking to, was right there with you when that event took place.

    If you remove all the superfluous dialogue, then the actual length of each episode, was less than 20 minutes.

  • Nefara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I have an intense distaste for Discovery, and wouldn’t recommend it.

    I could rant about it a la Angela Collier for 4 hours but here’s my main issues boiled down to a bulleted list:

    Some things I like about Star Trek:

    • Optimistic future, humans can create greatness and beauty if they continue to check and overcome their faults
    • No black and white villains. All antagonists are given nuance and development and many become favored allies
    • Themes of teamwork, a functional ensemble, core crew are all valid and valued, no one star of the show.
    • No such thing as magic or gods, everything is in the realm of human understanding if we have sufficient knowledge

    Guess what Disovery has?

    • Nihilistic, apocalyptic future
    • Bad guys that are just bad, they’re evil, don’t ask questions
    • One principal star of the show that is the focus of nearly every episode
    • No attempt to explain things with any veneer of science

    Then add on some blatant examples of total ignorance for the universe it’s set in, attempts at ham handed fan service by shoe horning in clumsy references to characters from other series, and just medocre drama in general, you have a show that is farther from Star Trek than a 14 year old’s submission on IO9.

    If you don’t really care,about Star Trek or know anything about it it can be entertaining I guess, but why watch it when there’s Strange New Worlds, Lower Decks and The Orville?

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      • Nihilistic, apocalyptic future

      Do you have any examples of the Nihilism? I’m struggling to think of any… In fact Season 3 was about maintaining optimism and faith in the strength of the Federation against unbelievable odds.

      • Bad guys that are just bad, they’re evil, don’t ask questions

      Khan, Gul Dukat and the Clown from Voyager were all in Discovery?

      • One principal star of the show that is the focus of nearly every episode

      I agree that there was a main character, but I also enjoy a lot of media with a main character so I don’t see that as a bad thing.

      • No attempt to explain things with any veneer of science

      I suggest you avoid watching TNG and TOS because they do the same thing!

      • Nefara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I don’t have much time to respond so I’m going to just hit one bullet for now:

        Are you going to try to argue that Khan and Gul Dukat weren’t given nuance and development? Some of the things that made them such compelling antagonists is that we were given insight into their motives and backgrounds and perspectives. Khan absolutely was nuanced and the persecution and illegality of genetically enhanced humans was a great stepping off point for him. Just about every antagonist that pops up in Star Trek gets some kind of explanation why they are doing the things they are doing, and the crew takes a moment to acknowledge their inherent worth as living beings and, if they’re sentient, discuss possibilities for negotiations or nonviolence. I haven’t forgotten that Klingons, Ferengi, Borg, Cardassians and many others start off as villains, but we are given many opportunities for them to be “humanized” through characters like Worf, Quark, Hugh/Seven, Garak and others. There are no “good” or “bad” aliens in Star Trek.

        So keeping that in mind, how did things go with the Ba’Ul? How did they handle Control? What nuance was Lorca given? In Discovery, your first impression of a bad guy being bad is always correct.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          You didn’t say Discovery villains didn’t “have nuance and development”. So no, I didn’t say that either.

      • MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Gul Dukat

        Maybe you drew too fast shot yourself in the foot?

        Gul Dukat is arguably the most wellformed villain in ST canon. He is a delusional maniac pursuing a twisted vision of greatness. He even works alongside our heroes for a time!

        Can I offer you an Armus instead?

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I agree that Gul Dukat is a delusional maniac! The guy I replied to said that only Discovery had such characters. But that said I will gladly accept your Armus!

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a romantic comedy. Not science fiction. I lost it at the musical. Musicals are what happens when writers have no ideas.

    • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Orville came out at the perfect time. The world was craving a good Trek, and was served Discovery. Orville scratched that decade-long itch, hitting all the right notes (though S1 was a bit rough…)

      Similarly with Picard and Lower Decks. Picard was a high-budget fanservice with a thin veneer of storyline. Lower Decks was good old classic Trek fun and shenanigans.

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I agree 100% with this take and want to thank you for that excellent video! I’m not all the way through yet, but I’m thoroughly enjoying it.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        With the soft speaking and camera panning across the bridge to catch everyone’s facial expressions in reaction to Burnham’s 13th motivational speech for the episode.

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I love Discovery. Some of the criticisms are valid; every season has a few dumb moments that make me shake my head. But I love the characters, the actors are all great, Doug Jones in particular is a treasure, and the first contact in season 4 feels more like a proper science fiction scenario than any other in Trek.

    One thing to keep in mind is that the tone shifts considerably season to season. It starts off quite grim and gritty, but don’t expect it to stay that way.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Eh, it’s ok. I’d definitely rank it below many other Star Trek series, but if you’ve seen all the better ones already then Discovery is worth a watch

  • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Discovery is fine overall.

    It may not be everyone’s favourite Trek but NO SINGLE SHOW IS EVERYONE’S FAVOURITE.

    I’m stooping to yelling because, looking at it as someone who saw TOS in first run, it really can’t be stressed enough that there needs to be new Trek for every generation.

    I didn’t expect that our GenZ kids would like Voyager best of the older shows.

    And yes, for one of our GenZs, Discovery season one is ‘the best season of Trek’ ever. They have rewatched all the seasons of the show more than I have.

    Discovery season 5 was fine in my view. I wasn’t fond of the series tacked on to the finale.

    Season 4 of Discovery has a better premise and structure than Picard season 2 but both seem to suffer terribly from being shot under COVID restrictions. Other shows managed to write around the limitations without such stilted and drawn own scenes. I don’t know what Paramount instructed its writers teams be it’s boggling to see these seasons against the rest now.

  • karashta@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The central character of the show is the least interesting person on it somehow despite having what could have been a good back story.

    Everyone else seems to be some sort of real person to me. She is just so boring and flat and everything revolves around her for no real reason. Her purpose seems to be to be the fence post that stands there and eventually cries.

    The best thing about the show was it gave us Anson Mount as Pike and he is outstanding. He was so good as Pike we got SNW as a spinoff.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Don’t listen to the critics on the internet. If you’re not dying soon, watch it all. It’s Trek. It’s roughly 60% great, 30% mediocre to aged poorly, and 10% let’s never talk about it again.

    I would go in rough order of release because they do like harkening back to stuff. Actually rewatching TOS will be good for SNW. And Disco S2 is its backdoor pilot.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I couldn’t make it through the first season and tried picking up season 2 to see if it improved any. Didn’t watch anything past that.

    It was written by people who didn’t have a good grasp on what star trek was, or thought they could remake it better for a new generation. But they ended up making something that just leaves a sour taste in your mouth if you know what that setting is capable of being.

    To me, STD and the first season or so of Picard feel exactly like when a video game you thoroughly enjoy gets adapted into movie. There’s recognizable elements there, but nobody is acting the way they should and everything has that uncanny valley affect where you know what it’s supposed to be but it’s clearly failing to do it convincingly. It’s hard to point to what is actually wrong but you know several elements are off.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Protip: “STD” is not the official abbreviation for Discovery, it’s “DSC”. If you call it “STD” people are going to assume you watch those outrage bait youtubers who complained about how Discovery was “too woke”.