Consider me inspired - from this point forward, I collect the blood of my coworkers.

Y’know, just in case.

Yes, I’m fully aware of how much heavy lifting “should be” was doing - that’s why it was there.

so taxpayers again

It’s a Crown corporation, so taxpayer funding should be minimal, but it seems there are mechanisms for them to receive loans from the Ministry of Finance, which is a shame.

If due diligence is actually done, I would still predict that this thing fizzles out in a few years without actually getting built.

Then why pay attention to any of it?

The idea is also for it to be privately-funded, which would make it even DOA-er.

Unless OP knows something we don’t?

The Sycorax are quite terrifying

Such a good design, I’d like to see more of them.

I actually rooted for Harriet all the way up to her call with Torchwood.

It’s a really great portrayal, and TBH I think the episode does a decent job of laying out her motivations, right down to her rather weak apology at the end.

Maybe it’s just the third that’s on the roof at the moment.

I believe so.

I’m really not a Doctor/Rose shipper, but I am a big fan of the Tenth Doctor as a swashbuckling romantic, so I’m here for the flirting. I just never had any investment in things going beyond that.

I know this is more relevant to the upcoming Queen Victoria episode, but I think the themes of a Doctor and (especially) companion getting carried away with things were more aptly explored with Twelve and Clara.

Okay, I’m back.

Of all the times I’ve seen this episode, I’m not sure I really noticed that you can actually see the TARDIS blurp into existence mid-air when it first arrives in London. Neat, and not really what I expected.

I can’t quite put my finger on it, but Daniel Llewellyn (RIP) is a pretty memorable character for me. Shame what happened to him.

On the other hand, even though it’s quite memorable, I keep forgetting that “everybody going to the roof” is the plot of this episode. Not sure why.

The “pilot fish” are a ridiculous idea, and clearly just an excuse to have killer Santas and a buzzsaw Christmas tree. I’m not mad about it, but it’s a good reminder that RTD has always had an affinity for deep silliness.

Daniel Llewellyn decided to include blood in the Guinevere One “care package,” but…he didn’t use his own? Where did he get the blood?

The Torchwood buzzword is stronger than “Bad Wolf” right out of the gate, because we actually get a sense of what it means.

And on that note, much ink has been spilled over what the Doctor does to Harriet Jones, Prime Minister. There’s always been some truthiness to the suggestion that there’s some sexism in play, but…recent history has reminded us just how easy it is to topple a government over health concerns, if factors line up just right.

The alternate universe where it was set up and marketed differently would be interesting to see.

Bakula on “Quantum Leap”

Eve Harlow on “Agents of SHIELD”

The latter term is mentioned directly.

Bullet points is the more common term, which we also use. The Canadian “point form” is apparently a rare, more versatile alternative.

Salazar said she had never heard of the term point form before, even though she has some family that lives in Canada.

I think the figure is likely low - cost estimates usually are, and there isn’t even a design yet.

They’re probably hoping to exceed the goal, but they’ve kept the door open to using governnent funds if they have to.

Apologies for being a day late - the weekend sort of got away from me. I haven’t even been able to watch the damn thing yet!

I’ll be back once I have, but a couple of quick thoughts:

• Having the Doctor be unconscious for a large portion of the episode was a bold move that largely paid off. It was smart to let us spend time with Rose as she struggles with her grief, confusion, and an alien invasion.

• Tennant’s “no second chances” bit is chilling in the best way.

The agency says a total of 227,947 accounts were affected and that RBC transferred and refunded more than $22.4 million in refunds for those affected. The bank also made a $299,000 charitable donation.

Nathaniel Wallace, a spokesperson for RBC, says the lender takes its regulatory obligations seriously.

He says RBC self-reported the matter to the financial consumer watchdog and that RBC has fully co-operated with the regulator throughout the process.

Assuming this is all true, and assuming the refunds were full refunds, it looks like the bank was acting in good faith, which is honestly refreshing.

i didn’t know it existed until yesterday, I live thousands of kilometers away, I’ve never seen it, and I never plan to see it.

Pretty much your thesis statement. In order for it to be worthwhile, you have to be familiar with it, and it has to be close to you.

Truly the centre of Canadian society.

“The federal government should only pay for things in my immediate proximity” is one hell of an opening statement.

Future DW wardrobe designers take note, a ridiculous graduation gown over a tuxedo could be the future.

I don’t disagree - like I said, museum!

Churchill MB seems to want one.

Logistically challenging, but if there’s an actual market for a new pipeline, it might be a better option than doing through the Rockies and negotiating with First Nations that simply aren’t interested. Manitoba seems to have buy-in from a lot of Indigenous communities, at least at this early stage of the game (so early that you could argue it’s not really a “stage” at all).

But there’s also a significant possibility that despite whatever letters of understanding we have with Germany or whoever, the market simply isn’t there, or won’t be within a few years. Asia is steadily moving to renewables, and Europe probably isn’t too far behind.

Definitely not a McMansion, but it’s architectural significance has been described as “modest”. And it doesn’t seem very suitable for its actual task.

I probably would have favoured converting it into a museum and building a new official residence at a different location, but they seem intent on staying at this address.

Even after this announcement, I’m unclear as to whether the intent is to keep the original structure, or tear it down and start over (which, tbh, is probably the smarter move).