INCIDENTAL CONSUMPTION OF DIRT IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CHRONIC INTENTIONAL CONSUMPTION

Agree with me louder, though.

saying that everybody agrees with you

Now now, stop playing pretend, I didn’t say “everyone”. Scientists, anthropologists and doctors agree with me that incidental oral exposure to soil(eating dirt) is probably not harmful and potentially-to-likely healthy, not “everyone”. You, for instance, seem very anti-science/illiterate about the whole thing.

It’s fine if you and other people disagree with doctors, scientists and myself, who scientifically assert that exposure to uncontaminated soil is not dangerous and I could not care less about a “vote ratio”.

Your votes are worth nothing, zero. 100 times 0 is 0, my illiterate friend.

I understand you’re having trouble understanding the article(and all of the complementary articles that state the exact same thing), but I can read it and understand it. I care as much about your reading disability as I care about your downvote.

I’m not convinced that guy’s a real president, so no name changes for him.

Assuming other people haven’t read an article because you’re having trouble understanding it is kinda funny.

maybe you guys can start a reading group with each other rather than trying to make things up or put words in others’ mouths; nobody else is having the comprehension problems you share.

Sticking your dirty finger in your mouth =/= intentionally eating a handful of clay…

Correct.

Incidental ingestion is not the same thing as intentional consumption.

Coreect again! great work.

Are you gonna tell your kid that they need to lick their dirty hands clean?

I highly recommend you do not tell kids to “lick their dirty hands clean”, which ignores my own and the scientific advice in the linked and other articles regarding eating dirt.

it’s also gross and weird.

I’ll stick with the original scenario and gratefully receive $10,000 for saving a life.

But thank you for your new offer.

I feel like New Orleans will be into being an island.

that was not a stipulation.

Right!

If their hands end up in their mouths, or some of the dirt ends up in their mouths, keep an eye on them. If they develop a rash or fever, take them to a doctor. If they don’t, they’re probably fine.

The article I linked was just the top result of many scientific articles and anthropological studies reiterating the same scientific viewpoint that oral exposure to uncontaminated soil(also known as eating dirt) is not dangerous and potentially-leaning-toward-likely healthy.

“surrounded by the Gulf of Mexico, by the end of the century”

hate to break it to these researchers, but the Gulf of Mexico has had New Orleans cornered for quite some time.

Prolong an inevitable death by one second for $10,000.

Is that stackable?

Is the term “exposure” tripping you up?

That can mean topical, membranous, oral exposure, as talked about in the article.

Folk wisdom says it’s healthy. doctors say it’s healthy.

Go for it.

About 2 people are dying every second regardless, so if i don’t take the money, 2 people die.

Im actually saving a life by briefly capping the death rare at 1.

Isolation is key for recording audio.

As lomg as the creaks are there, and the mic is nearby, the mic will pick them up.

They can try to lower the mic gain, maybe get lucky. dense pads or airfoams won’t do anything as vibrations will travel straight through them, and won’t make a difference for creaks traveling through the air.

The most effective thing will be you or them working in a different area.

The farthest room from your creaking is ideal with doors and walls in between. Getting comforters from the thrift store and hanging them around the mic will help mitigate ambient noise as well.

mics are built to be ultra-sensitive and pick up vibrations, so acoustic isolation is necessary for decent audio.

Thiel’s a lunatic

NTA, makes perfect sense. It doesn’t sound like you’re getting what you want out of the relationship. Either of you, really.

Oh wow, I wouldn’t have guessed you could get that level of detail and accuracy with the same saw blade, the holes are as well crafted and deliberate as the outlines, amazing!

Thanks for explaining the different processes, it’s fascinating. The end results are truly a more than the sum of its parts kind of thing. I look forward to seeing any other pieces you share here!

This, of course, is why people have stopped commenting on the internet.

I get the vibes, they aren’t exactly deep, but the sentiment is weakened for failing to account for its internal inaccuracy.

It’s delivering its message poorly.