• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Amazing to think that a southern US government would act sensibly on what they consider a hoax.

    Nothing will happen from the official side. But some smarter people will sell their homes to dumber ones, and move out.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    As the article says, people will just slowly move somewhere else as insurance prices go up. Some relocation plan would be needed only if you didn’t want people to first lose their house to a flood and then move elsewhere with no savings. I don’t think politicians care.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      people will just slowly move somewhere else

      Moving house is only possible if one can afford to sell their current house for enough money to relocate. In Louisiana, that’s far from guaranteed.

      I’m not sure everyone’s rebuilt after Katrina yet.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Netherlands doesn’t get nearly as many hurricanes.

      New Orleans is probably looking more at a Venice situation. Pull out the roads and carve out canals

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Just move up to the 1st floor. The roads will turn into canals of their own accord.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          That might work if the streets are raised 1 story and the streets become the tidal barrier. This is how the seattle waterfrony was built in some areas.

          Imo though I think it makes sense in the long term to just consider the entire area a tidal or submerged area and build/modify accordingly on stilts/pilings and then backfill around just the stilts/pilings.

          Roads are too flat and won’t be navigable when partly submerged. Imo thats why it makes sense to build out canals that can be navigated at low tide. The sidewalks can then serve quadruple duty as sidewalk, utility areas, mud barrier, and dock.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      It’s already doing that. However most of New Orleans is below sea level and that entire part of the state is a river delta/swamp. All of that low lying swampland is receding, potentially leaving New Orleans as a small island out at sea.

      You can no longer just protect the city from floods, no longer just reinforce the coastline, you’d have to protect the entire lower part of the state. And it’s not just rising sea level, but floods from the entire Mississippi watershed, and hurricanes. That’s just not reasonable or sustainable

  • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “surrounded by the Gulf of Mexico, by the end of the century”

    hate to break it to these researchers, but the Gulf of Mexico has had New Orleans cornered for quite some time.

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    This scenario makes the region the “most physically vulnerable coastal zone in the world”, the researchers state, and requires immediate action to prepare a smooth transition for people away from New Orleans, which has a population of about 360,000 people, to safer ground.

    Uhhh…Bangladesh would like a word

  • Astronut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Standin’ on the corner

    Of Toulouse and Dauphine

    Waitin’ on Marie-Ondine

    I’m tryin’ to place a tune

    Under a Louisiana moonbeam

    On the planet of New Orleans…