• 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    In Germany there is a maximum first response time (depending on the Bundesland) of 8 to 17 minutes. This is by law and it is regularly verified that those times are not exceeded. The timer starts the moment you call and ends when the medical staff arrives.

    So yes, calling an ambulance that will be there in unter 20 minutes is the preferred way. They will also send an emergency doctor who can directly start working while driving back to the hospital.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      To get that response rate in the United States, literally every single US citizen we have to work as a ambulance driver, and they still wouldn’t be enough

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      That sounds great for Germany, but what does that have to do with the US where this law is being mandated? The US isn’t like Germany in any way that matters to this discussion.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Cool.

      What’s the first response time in the US?

      Also, the ambulance has to go from the hospital to your house and back to the hospital, which is slower than a 1 way trip even with their sirens.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure where you’re located, but in the US most ambulances aren’t based out of hospitals, usually there’s ambulance stations, or they’re attached to a fire company.

        Now it’s a big country with a lot of different types of towns with their own unique situations, but there’s a lot of cases where your local ambulance company is going to be a lot closer to you than a hospital, which means they can make up the difference pretty easily with their sirens , and you start getting at least some level of treatment from EMTs or paramedics that much sooner.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        the ambulance has to go from the hospital to your house and back

        And it has a doctor on board. So the emergency treatment starts right at my house.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          In the US, ambulances are staffed by medical technicians and have no connection to hospitals or doctors outside of delivering patients to them.

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ehh, restricted to the capacities of an ambulance which is why they’re taking you to a hospital anyways.

          Also, the 1-way trip the ambulance makes to your house could be done in a similar amount of time as the 1-way trip you take to the hospital. Then your real treatment can begin.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ambulances almost never have a doctor onboard in the US

          There are 2 main levels of EMS, Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) There’s some additional sub-categories, and some things vary according to local regulations and such, bit I’m just giving a very general overview.

          As a general rule BLS will be staffed by EMTs and ALS will have a paramedic.

          Paramedics can start an IV, administer some more medications than an EMT can, and provide some other more advanced treatments, but they stop well short of what a doctor can do.

          Not all ambulances are staffed to the ALS level, a lot of places have had a hard time keeping their EMS agencies fully staffed, I know in my area, in theory, all of our agencies can provide ALS service, but frequently some of them have to go BLS-only due to staffing issues. Because of this, some areas have started expanding the scope of what EMTs are able to do to make up for a lack of paramedics (though they also often face a lack of EMTs as well)

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m sure that’s the same over here. But the situation in this discussion was that a family member shows signs of a stroke, in this case I don’t think they will send an ambulance only capable to provide BLS but hopefully one of those.