THIS is misleading, though.

There are definitely more than just 69 users who uploaded packages to the AUR.

The vast majority of the AUR is package some random person added once then never bothered with ever again.

Yes, that sucks. But I was thinking of exclusively this packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages?submit=Orphans

Finally some good AI news!

[Changing a package’s name] would break all dependencies of this package.

Yes, that is correct. But that should not be a big deal for packages that are actively maintained. The maintainer can simply change the dependency to the new name after making sure the new package is legit.

The problem is the current implementation

Yes, exactly this! I am not surprised it happens. I’m surprised it didn’t happen before.

especially new accounts

Weren’t there “sleeper accounts” registered years ago that became active in the current wave?

Also the AUR helpers should do a better job.

Even experienced people will just update as if nothing could happen. Adopted packages should have to use a different name and the current name being blocked so it WILL get attention when some tries to update their system.

Adoptions are a mistake anyways. Remove unmaintained packages and block the name for several months.

I keep my head down as much as possible.

Good work is always penalized with more work.

Don’t stick out at the top or the bottom.

He’s a keeper!

Das müsste dann aber schon ein wallendes Gewand sein, ich mag meine Beinfreiheit!

On one side I enjoy solitude, walking alone, drawing, fishing and cooking. Most people bore me because I find them dull and superficial. I specially hate the talkative, needy ones who wont shut up and believe I care what they think. I dislike big groups of drunks or people that need to yell and listen to loud music to feel good.

And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that!

Ich trage schon keine kurzen Hosen! Da werde ich mit Sicherheit auch keinen Rock tragen!

Als ob ich 8 Stunden vor Feierabend noch was neues anfangen würde.

The psychopath billionaire now sees the negative effects of his actions on his net worth.

Have your dreams ever had effects on you like that?

Not like that, no. But I had a dream once about a specific coding/logic issue where in my dream I came up with a solution that actually worked in reality.

Oh Junge, das eskalierte zügig.

Mein Reden. Bestehende Regelungen konsequent anwenden und durchsetzen.

Andererseits verstehe ich auch die Polizei. Die haben sicher besseres zu tun, als ’nen Bericht wegen ’nem Kind zu schreiben das eh keinerlei Strafe zu erwarten hat und morgen wieder mit dem Kumpel gemeinsam auf dem Scooter ohne Versicherungsplakette steht.

Ähm … Das Verbot besteht bereits.

§3 eKFV

FACT

The corporation basically stole the project from the community and started hiding features behind a paywall.

It is completely irrelevant if you need the features that are closed and behind a paywall and are not part of the open core.

We should also keep in mind that Gitea was hostilely taken away from the community by a for-profit corporation that made Gitea open-core by hiding a way features behind a paywall in a cloud.

cgit always feels last century. Even with so-called “modern CSS” it’s just ancient.