Dockworkers, cleaners, and mechanics are standing in solidarity with the Swedish Tesla employees who are seeking better pay and conditions.

The labor dispute over Tesla’s refusal to sign a collective wage agreement in Sweden has escalated into a dramatic labor battle.

Unions representing multiple industries announced this week that they would join the strike in solidarity with IF Metall, the Tesla mechanics’ trade union.

The standoff started in late October with a walkout led by IF Metall.

In Sweden, which doesn’t have minimum wage legislation for workers, about 90% of employees are covered by collective agreements involving unions and employers.

IF Metall describes the agreements as “the backbone of the Swedish model” and said it’s been trying to negotiate one with Tesla for the last five years.

The union said Tesla wages are below the industry average in Sweden, and it wants to secure better pensions and insurance guarantees.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    1061·
    1 year ago

    Tesla’s refusal to sign a collective wage agreement

    I’m sorry, what?

    Arrogance, ignorance and hubris.

    It’s a typical story at this point. American company comes to Europe, doesn’t do its research, doesn’t know how these things work over here, management in the US refuses to adapt, few years down the line they fuck off with their tail between their legs.

    Staggeringly incompetent.

    • honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      93·
      1 year ago

      The story of McDonalds in Denmark is a fun example of this if anyone wants to read. [1]

      McDonalds decided not to follow the union agreement and thus set up its own pay levels and work rules instead. This was a departure, not just from what Danish companies did, but even from what other similar foreign companies did. For example, Burger King, which is identical to McDonalds in all relevant respects, decided to follow the union agreement when it came to Denmark a few years earlier.

      In late 1988 and early 1989, the unions decided enough was enough and called sympathy strikes in adjacent industries in order to cripple McDonalds operations. Sixteen different sector unions participated in the sympathy strikes.

      Dockworkers refused to unload containers that had McDonalds equipment in them. Printers refused to supply printed materials to the stores, such as menus and cups. Construction workers refused to build McDonalds stores and even stopped construction on a store that was already in progress but not yet complete. The typographers union refused to place McDonalds advertisements in publications, which eliminated the company’s print advertisement presence. Truckers refused to deliver food and beer to McDonalds. Food and beverage workers that worked at facilities that prepared food for the stores refused to work on McDonalds products.

      Once the sympathy strikes got going, McDonalds folded pretty quickly and decided to start following the hotel and restaurant agreement in 1989.

      This is why McDonalds workers in Denmark are paid $22 per hour.

      [1] https://mattbruenig.com/2021/09/20/when-mcdonalds-came-to-denmark/

      • bstix@feddit.dkEnglish
        28·
        1 year ago

        Just for the record: McDonald’s, Burger King, Subway, KFC and Starbucks all have collective agreements in Denmark.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        19·
        1 year ago

        Once the sympathy strikes got going, McDonalds folded pretty quickly and decided to start following the hotel and restaurant agreement in 1989.

        As fucking usual, the companies could have done this all along. They’re just going to give the least, while charging the most.

    • AmberPrince@kbin.social
      591·
      1 year ago

      Tinfoil hat time: they do know. They are attempting to normalize the U.S. model in Europe to drive down labor costs.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      6·
      1 year ago

      Had that happen when working for Symantec in Argentina. They wouldn’t do cost of living adjustments to account for the 30% inflation so the government forced a union on us. All they asked for was to give us the same salary, accommodating for inflation–in the end, this comes to the same dollar amount per employee. As best I can tell, the business bros couldn’t understand inflation and exchange rates and they decided to simply lay off several hundred people and close their offices in the county entirely. Little did they know that you can’t do that in Argentina and pretty much every single person sued, myself included, and won two year’s salary, minus lawyer fees. If they had simply kept paying the same number of dollars to everyone, they’d have saved tens of millions of dollars.

    • somedude@lemmy.ninjaEnglish
      233·
      1 year ago

      So why work there in the first place? Why bother with a strike? Quit and work some place with better conditions.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        27·
        1 year ago

        Or you know, use your collective power to strike, following the model your country has based its economic rights around. Why should the workers give up their economic power to the company?

        Tesla could also just follow the economic agreement that is considered fair in the area for that labor, the bare minimum contract. So odd that youre not complaining about them having poor conditions and breaking the nation’s norms.

        It’s almost like both parties, Tesla and the unions, are now working in their best financial interests. Lets see which on e succeeds.

      • fneu@discuss.tchncs.de
        16·
        1 year ago

        Someone will be desperate enough to work there. Now McDonald’s has a competitive advantage and other places will have to follow suit and then it‘s worse everywhere. It‘s amazing that there are places out there where regular people can actually influence anything.