why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.
We have no obligation to pay him to play somewhere else. If he wants to not play any football for two years he is more than welcome to. But if he wants to play football again then he better find a club to pay him or take a pay cut. Because we aren’t paying him money to play for Juventus.
Why should united pay his wages while he plays for another club? If he wants a career revival he can take a drop in wages or apologise to the manager.
They wouldn’t be paying all his wages right? So it’s a decrease in costs for them
why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.
Why would a potential club pay him what you lot are paying him? Since they won’t, why would Sancho agree to the move to lose money.
So you’ll either pay him the full amount to do nothing, and pay a fraction of it for him to play elsewhere
We have no obligation to pay him to play somewhere else. If he wants to not play any football for two years he is more than welcome to. But if he wants to play football again then he better find a club to pay him or take a pay cut. Because we aren’t paying him money to play for Juventus.