why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.
why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.