There are a lot of GOP-controller legislatures in the USA pushing through so-called “child protection” laws, but there’s a toll in the form of impacting people’s rights and data privacy. Most of these bills involve requiring adults to upload a copy of their photo ID.

  • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The government has way too much influence over children already. Governments could do so much for children that would actually benefit them (better education, free lunch at school, better public libraries, ensure no kids are starving because of poor parents, no wars in foreign countries, whatever) but instead they use children to increase their control over people.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it has nothing to do with children. It is about requiring ID registration for online services so that identities can be tracked. Every time authoritarians want to push another mechanism of control it’s always “about the children”.

  • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My state actually blocked all porn sites. In theory this is a good thing… however it’s pretty easy to bypass with a VPN. If someone wants to get access to porn there are about a million different ways of doing so.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m against it. Parents should be helping their children go online go submit homework or whatever they need to do. You cannot babyproof the internet the same way you cannot babyproof society. Parents in the 90s understood this well. Parents in the 20s do not understand this.

    Build safer websites for kids. Don’t degrade adult spaces, because the 4chans and fox newses will always exist, but will take down the good sites as collateral.

    The internet will always be an open forum of advertisements, ideas, arguing, and little niches of helpful information and nerds.

  • Enelokk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m definitely in favor of some rules for porn, and that basic rule is being of age. Administrators of pornographic servers should also sort harmful content and select videos. He also had some problems in the past https://www.pornhub.com/ and had to delete some videos, so you have to choose sites with a gentler obasaho for adults https://www.pornann.com/nl. However, I am strongly against the state banning tasteful pornography. Recently, there are only commands, prohibitions and dictating to people how they should live and what they should do. No way!!

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its not the governments job to make up for absent parenting.

    If you dont want your kids seeing things or doing shit online, its your job to monitor them and talk to them about it.

    Stop throwing your kids a tablet and expecting that to be the fuckin parent.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering these are Republican states, they’re just going to define Wikipedia articles about gender dysphoria as pornographic lol

    Think carefully and double check before you ever agree with a Republican about anything.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think carefully and double check before you ever agree with a Republican politician about anything.

      FTFY

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t make the rest automatically trustworthy. Just not genocidal. Though I tend to agree with Progressives and Socialist Dems or Socialists more often than not. Regular, middle of the road Dems, not as much.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not genocidal eh? Ask a Democrat how many people they think Earth can support long term, then subtract that from Earth’s current population. Your answer is how many people they, at some level, believe need to be gone.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, and I’m not saying both parties don’t want to surveil and control the population, but as you might be able to understand I’m a bit more focused on the Party that has all but made extermination of people like me the Party platform.

  • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m against heavy handed regulation because it pushes people into more dangerous spaces, if you’re a teenager or unID’d adult who can’t access real porn sites do you decide not to look at boobs or do you seek out unregulated communities on places like discord?

    Would you like your kid seeing generic regulated porn or seeing the kinds of things people can’t post on regulated porn sites? Plus not only is there the fact that the content on underground sites is by their nature the stuff not allowed on regulated sites but also do you want your kid taking to the creeps that hang out in porn sharing groups on discord?