I mean if you really want to have the discussion, than you could argue that Saka and Tomiyasu were both worse than Havertz.
Both played fine, but Havertz was better, and consistantly making good runs and giving good passes.
But Saka and Tomi are two of the most loved players on this sub, so you won’t hear it. Rightfully so by the way, I love them both as well.
Thing is, Tomi had a stinker for the goal we conceded. He also didn’t do many other things exceptionelly well. Just a solid game, with one major mistake leading to a goal.
Saka was quiet all game, but he had an assist, so I guess that evens out.
Havertz was the reason that our attacking play had some movement towards it. When he got subbed off, the attacking play completely stopped
I’m not even gonna discuss Saka, who’s been quite rightly called out for being off form recently but he he was good this game
This is a clear example of this Havertz delusion hypocrisy… you all say people slander Havertz just because he missed a sitter but then you’ll say Tomiyasu for that one instance in the same breath
Should he have done better? Yes but he had 5 1v1s with Koleosho who is a absolute menace and he had to basically push him over to get past. And even then Tomi has the second lowest score despite dealing with Burnley’s biggest threat. Do I think that means there is a agenda for or against him? No a lot of people actually gave up on Tomi but he’s proven them wrong and Havertz would get the same love if he did too
![[RESULTS] Post Match Ratings | Arsenal 3-1 Burnley](https://alien.top/pictrs/image/caa2551a-42f6-4f8a-a0b0-241fd1358841.webp){kind=link}
I mean if you really want to have the discussion, than you could argue that Saka and Tomiyasu were both worse than Havertz.
Both played fine, but Havertz was better, and consistantly making good runs and giving good passes.
But Saka and Tomi are two of the most loved players on this sub, so you won’t hear it. Rightfully so by the way, I love them both as well.
Thing is, Tomi had a stinker for the goal we conceded. He also didn’t do many other things exceptionelly well. Just a solid game, with one major mistake leading to a goal.
Saka was quiet all game, but he had an assist, so I guess that evens out.
Havertz was the reason that our attacking play had some movement towards it. When he got subbed off, the attacking play completely stopped
This hurt my brain
I’m not even gonna discuss Saka, who’s been quite rightly called out for being off form recently but he he was good this game
This is a clear example of this Havertz delusion hypocrisy… you all say people slander Havertz just because he missed a sitter but then you’ll say Tomiyasu for that one instance in the same breath
Should he have done better? Yes but he had 5 1v1s with Koleosho who is a absolute menace and he had to basically push him over to get past. And even then Tomi has the second lowest score despite dealing with Burnley’s biggest threat. Do I think that means there is a agenda for or against him? No a lot of people actually gave up on Tomi but he’s proven them wrong and Havertz would get the same love if he did too