• iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As I understand it, that’s still not very historically accurate. It was not really a thing for archers to nock and loose together like they do in the movies.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never really made sense to me, loose all the arrows at once and then give a break between volleys? Gives everyone a chance to hide behind their shield, and then advance when it’s clear. Unless volleys are perfectly timed between multiple rows of archers.

      Random arrows flying constantly never gives the enemy a chance to feel safe since it’s a constant barrage, and there’s no wasted time for the archers needing to wait for the command to fire.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Archers were strategic weapons, not the main crux of killilng. They were used to do things like keeping an enemy division pinned down so that your cavalry can move around them or one of your own divisions can reach a more advantageous position. A well placed concentrated barrage could force an enemy to move in a direction that is more advantageous to you, etc…

        They weren’t the primary means of killing people. They were the means of steering the battle where the general wanted it to go.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volley_fire Y’all really just make stuff up without even checking wikipedia huh? It wasn’t typically used in medieval Europe for bows beyond the initial volley, though of course initial volleys were still a thing. You didn’t just have elements of archer formations fire whenever they decided the range seemed right.