• DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll save you a click. Because they’re poorly and cheaply made, limited in design, and generally small. Also the savings aren’t what they should be for the reduction in quality

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where did you see the thing about quality? All I found was:

      They also had to overcome the “zeitgeist around prefabrication in Canada” which assumes factory builds are poor quality, Chicoine said.

      That’s no longer based in reality; some studies have argued prefab projects can catch potential defects during the design phase, yielding higher-quality builds.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        You assumed by, “save you a click,” they’d read and summarized the article? No, they are such a big brain, they know everything without even having to read the article!

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You assumed by, “save you a click,” they’d read and summarized the article?

          Not at all. But it never hurts to be polite.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s not really the focus of the article at all.

      I think prefab has the potential to ease the housing crisis here in Australia.