Sure, but that has almost no impact on Fed policies.

I’m not sure why you’re responding to my comment. What you said seems to be completely unrelated to what I said.

As I’ve pointed out elsewhere, that’s not inflation. That’s a lack of purchasing power, not inflation which is a loss of purchasing power. We lost that purchasing power over 2022 and 2023, but the difference in price between November of 2023 and now is relatively small.

Which is a made up target with a wide margin. Many economists think a stable inflation rate might be 3% or higher! So 2.4% might already be on target.

That definition is literally describing a change, as rate of change.

Inflation is a loss of purchasing power

Over the past year, we haven’t experienced a loss of purchasing power. We have a lack of purchasing power, but we lost it over the 2-3 years prior to the last year.

a rise in prices for goods and services over time

This is pretty much the mathematical definition of a rate of change. Like how speed is the rate of change in position over time. After a day of traveling, your position (prices for goods) may be way different than your starting point, but if you’re not currently moving, your speed (inflation) is NIL.

Inflation rate and inflation are the same. You’re confusing inflation with affordability.

The inflation is still high

Where are you getting that from? That’s not what the numbers say.

While the party make-up and views were pretty similar, Harper ruled the party with a pretty firm hand. Even though many of the religious-right wanted socially conservative policies, he generally didn’t let them question things like abortion. I’m not sure Poilievre has the same control over the party.

People from rural areas don’t drive to Toronto very often. It’s the drivers from the suburbs that you’re thinking of.

This is definitely wrong. For example, I know Canada has reactors under construction: https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1002543/ontario-breaks-ground-on-world-leading-small-modular-reactor

I’d suggest deleting and re-posting. At this point, it’s an old post and probably not going to get the traction you want.

Is there more to this post than a picture?

While I don’t disagree, it’s the fact that the government changed the rules, and on short notice. If grocers had known they would need to collect, clean, and package returns, many would have made different decisions.

That’s not what the polls said at all.

I support this move, but a change.org petition isn’t the way to go. Get an MP to submit an official petition to www.ourcommons.ca

It’s a feature of TikTok where you can put your video side-by-side with some else’s video. This seems like a decent explanation.

Carrier lock is on the phone, not the network. You need to enter a code to disable it. There are 3rd party services that you give your IMEI and pay, and they have a way of finding the code. I’m not certain on the details.

I’m in total agreement with you about supporting bike lanes, I’m just pointing out the fallacy of saying, “We can’t afford to build rail.”

I hate this and a lot of other decisions the Ford gouvernement has made, but they also greenlit the biggest expansion of GO Transit ever. Plus, a ton of other public transit projects.

That idea just makes me cringe. Personally, I don’t want to be associated with something so crass, and I’d prefer if our critiques were more specific and intelligent.