• ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I feel so justified for doubling down on Zen 3, and replacing my dead R9 5900X with an R9 5900XT lol

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I fucking had to keep pushing back buying some more RAM. Yeah, that was a great move. Now I can only hope the bubble bursts and prices crash.

    I mean, I get by fine with the RAM I have. I don’t need much. It’s the principle of the thing, you know? Sometimes being financially responsible and careful sucks.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The thing with the bubble bursting is it will still take time for it to come down, as they’ll need to start manufacturering consumer RAM again. The stuff they’re churning out now can’t be thrown into a PC or laptop.

      And they’ll NEVER allow prices to drop back to reasonable levels. They’ve already learned people will pay a premium during a shortage, so they can still artificially control the supply to keep prices high.

      If competitors ever emerge making RAM at reasonable prices, we need to boycott the current fuckwads even when they undercut the new players.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The only rational choice right now is to wait to buy new ram.

    Either production capacity catches up and this amount of silicon is the new normal and prices come down or the ai bubble does crash and prices come down.

    It can’t go on at this price point forever.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    On the plus side, all the game companies are going to finally start optimizing games and quit pushing out more and more demanding shit. A big win for smaller devs and creative\fun game developers too. My steam deck and old PC gonna keep on winning.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Do I want more memory or do I wait for two years…

    I wait for two years. As long as the existing memory modules doesn’t break, Linux will continue to be happy with existing amount.

    If you are on windows, good luck.

    • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I built a PC for work (I’m going to take it with me when I leave) and I bought used adata ram (2x32gb) with a lifetime warranty on it. I immediately needed to send one of the sticks for warranty. I bought the initial set of ram in May, and yesterday I paid roughly the same for a used set of 2x16gb. The price of the 32gb sticks is prohibitively expensive now. I’m betting the price only goes up, just wish I would be at 128gb rather than 96gb.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        We could have been so rich if we could have seen the future. Just buy tons of memory modules at low prices five years ago and sell them now. What a profit.

        Its not like memory tech has changed so much either.

  • DeLancre@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And suddenly me “unjustifiably” buying 128gb of DDR5 was a good investment of money.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Same. But more than that - I noticed that my 7700x is a huge bottleneck: desktop CPUs limited to just 2 channels, plus controller in 7700 is kinda meh, so I can’t force anything above 5600mt\s with my 4 sticks. Switching to new CPU should allow to increase speed, but will still lock me to 2 channels. So I should’ve bought cheapest threadripper instead, which allows 4 or 8 channels instead.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Depends what you are going for. 7000/9000 series have way more per-thread performance than threadripper.

            Another quirk with single CCD 7000 chips (which I have as well) is that the infinity fabric limits effective bandwidth to the CPU cores. Even with two channels, you hit diminishing returns with higher speeds, especially if you aren’t using the IGP.

            You can get around it overclocking the IF, but it gets complicated and its much easier to do with 9000 series CPUs.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          YMMV.

          Big ZRAM absolutely tanks performance for me because it “steals” space that could be used for normal memory.

          But if its for squirrling away a bunch of idle processes when multitasking like crazy, yeah, it can be wonderful. Just depends.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, I splurged on some hardware upgrades with great shame almost 2 years ago because I was preparing for the idiotic tariffs, expecting modest price increases.

      I did not expect a 5x. So glad that I did it. It would no longer be an option.

      • Jeffool @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I kick myself every day for putting off replacing this 2017 build of mine… My 1080 weeps.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I did not ever think PC prices would go as crazy as they are now.

        but I thank my fucking asscheeks every day that I upgraded my CPU, GPU and RAM right before the shit hit the fan just by pure luck and coincidence.

        I still wish I had a better GPU, I had to settle for the one I got cause finances… but I sure as fuck aint getting anything better for a reasonable price at this rate.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I still wish I had a better GPU

          My 7900xtx was a rollercoaster of emotions all the way till now, so I decided to buy nvidia even tho I don’t support them as a company in the slightest (nor do I support amd at this point, considering they dipped in same AI bubble as soon as they had the chance).

          So yeah, “I will just buy next top-tier gpu as soon as it arrives” was looking like this for past couple of years:

          image

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I’m rockin a 6700xt for my gpu :\

            I really shouldnt complain, its a great card, it just doesnt have the horse power to chug through the bullshit lack of optimization in Unreal5 based games. especially ones that force some form of raytracing to be on with no toggle.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I built a new PC around that time for the same reason. I am kicking myself for not getting more ram.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      We’ve been told historical lies. People who have an issue with this are like Luddites, but that’s because the Luddites were justified too!

      They weren’t against technology; they were against it being used to abuse and exploit them as workers.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          70
          ·
          19 hours ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddites

          The Luddites were members of a 19th-century movement of English textile workers who protested the usage of certain types of automated machinery owing to their concerns relating to worker pay, labour savings, child labour, working conditions, and output quality. They often destroyed said machines in organised raids. Members of the group referred to themselves as Luddites, self-described followers of “Ned Ludd”, a legendary weaver whose name was used as a pseudonym in threatening letters to mill owners and government officials.

          • Leon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            History is written by the victors, and the luddites lost. That’s why they’re maligned as backwards idiots who didn’t want tech to succeed.

            They weren’t stupid. They knew precisely what was going to happen, and did their best to stop it. Generally they took care to target only machines as their goal wasn’t to harm people but to remain employed, and have money to survive with. Naturally there were exceptions, and sometimes people did get hurt.

            But then, the bourgeoisie enacted law to prevent this where destroying mechanical looms became punishable by… oh let’s see…

            The act, as passed, made the destruction of mechanised looms […] a capital felony (and hence a crime punishable by death).

            Right! Death! Destruction of company property became punishable by death.

            And people did die. Children died. Mind you, back then workers were anyone capable of working, and they had no rights. They didn’t vote for the people who passed this act; workers weren’t supposed to have a voice, and so the only recourse was rebellion.

            This didn’t stop things immediately, there’s quite a lot of really cool worker history here, but eventually the government sent in the military and couple that with nothing really changing despite widespread rebellion, the luddite movement fizzled out.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’ve never heard it used as an insult. How is it even supposed to be offensive? “Har har you’re a person who doesn’t like tech”?

          • plateee@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Less of “you’re a person who doesn’t like tech” and more “you’re not with the times/are scared of the future”… which is pretty close to some messaging from clankers.

            • halezinflames@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I am scared of the future, you know why? Because everything feels so unbearably bleak and I wish I had something to feel actually hopeful for.

              But I guess we’ll own nothing and be forced to live with it.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They confuse us with legitimate technophobes.

      My stepmother was a technophobe. She read articles about school shootings in the US, and thought if I got addicted to video games like Quake, I’ll be buying a machine gun from the black market, then end up as a murderer. Yes, she also had a moral panic about drug use, all while she was a borderline alcoholic. The farce in it was that while I wasn’t allowed to play any Quake games, there was no harm in Unreal games, which arguably are better. The tragedy in it was that she tried her best to steer me away from computers, giving me some disadvantage in college, also she lied to the doctors about my first seizure to make it seem like it was due to the computer, which lead to the doctors not doing tests besides EEG and strobe lights. Once social media rolled out, she somewhat changed her mind on the subject, though she was still ignorant enough to think “software developer” and “CNC programmer” are the same, and almost got me a job at a local factory (she feared that if I lived on Budapest for a bit longer, I’d get some lung disease, because big city equals bad air).

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          She’s dead, and I don’t know how to feel about it, especially as she abused my brother even harder than me.

          • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yeah apparently you’d think there be some closure or something but it seems that’s not how it works. Keep in there, and try to forget about the whole ordeal, that’s what I’m trying anyways, living with my demons. Works. Cheers.

  • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Give it 10 years and civilians won’t be able to own PCs… We will be forced to the cloud computers. And by that time AI surveillance and profiling will already have its infrastructure built.

    • nehal3m@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We need to figure out how to do our daily things with very few computing resources. Gaming and heavy workloads excepted, most things we do ought to be possible on 15 year old CPU’s and 2GB. All we need is efficiency and low expectations. Fuck em.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It was already possible to do that. Then Electron came in and developers thought it was better to just release stupid apps that take 4 GB of RAM each.

          • monotremata@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s still about 1000x less raw CPU performance than the cheapest smartphone on the market, though.

            (E.g. a Blu View 5 Pro, which is the cheapest Tracfone is listing as in stock, for $30. Its Helio G36 uses 4 Cortex A53 cores at 2200MHz and 4 at 1800 MHz, and between 1-2 instructions per clock, giving between 16000-32000 million instructions per second. The IBM ran at 16.6 million instructions per second, per that Wikipedia link.)

            (Looking at Walmart turned up a TCL K33 5G for only $20, but it uses a Dimensity 6300 cpu which is actually a little more powerful.)

        • rbos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Not even. The Intel 8008 didn’t even break 1MHz and that was a few years later.

          I don’t know what they used on the moon landing, though.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I don’t know what they used on the moon landing, though.

            An efficient, real-time multitasking software stack on a 2MHz processor with the equivalent of ~4K of RAM and 64K of ROM.

            Smart enough to handle being accidentally overloaded by its operators and still balance a spacecraft on a single engine and land on the moon while doing multiple reboots to clear its software stack. It would work its way down a list of “fly a spacecraft” tasks from critical, to informational, to just monitoring, with a certain amount of time allocated to complete the whole list. If it ran out of time, it would drop everything, perform the equivalent of a reboot with navigation parameters parked in memory, and then start again at the most critical task.

            Apollo 11’s crew accidentally left their rendezvous radar (which was checking on the location of the command module in orbit) in a mode that constantly poked the computer with “pay attention to me” interrupts, and it couldn’t service the radar and run through it’s task list completely while it was on descent to the lunar surface.

            To the programming team’s credit, this just caused an overload alarm a few times and the mission completed successfully.

            The Apollo programmers pretty much created the whole software engineering field from scratch in the 10 years before 1969.

      • Leafimo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        And even gaming is possible with those specs: retro gaming and emulation, thousands of excellent games

    • MidnightMarauder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Its already here. Most “regular” users already depend for most part of there digital life on subscription based cloud computing. Al lot of people don’t even own a PC anymore, only mobile devices.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I was there on the first wave of the cloud boom (2012-ish), it’s biggest pushers got really angry that we weren’t up to give up our computers for “sleek, slim, and elegant” devices that would make wires “obsolete” at least in the home, so we can finally live in a sci-fi movie. They literally wanted us to use “browser app” DAWs that would do it’s computing on the cloud, then they realized many of us would like to record music, run live effects, etc.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I mean, today I saw a chocolate company ad saying no AI was needed. For chocolate. Anti-AI in a chocolate ad.

      If Sees Candy is getting in on AI hate to sell shit, obviously people are tired of this crap. The bubble will burst.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      and if it doesn’t, let em have it. I’ll cancel my internet, and start overloading all other infrastructure with confusion from not knowing how to deal with humans and paper…

      idgaf. I can’t and won’t be forced to comply to a subscription.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    No big. Guess I’ll have to wait another year before upgrading my laptop. Sorry for the loss of business.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They want you to get a cloud computer subscription. They want you to buy a Windows Portal, or whatever garbage small “terminal” device they will come up, and force regulators to make it be called a “fully fledged computer”.

      • Napster153@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve called it. Laptops and PCs will be outlawed and hunted down like hiding a radio unit in WW2. Think Farenheit 451 levels of dogma

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Chip companies are cutting off consumers on purpose. They lost your $100 business and gained $1000 sales on the same products