• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I fucking hate the ‘quiet quitting’ term. It puts the onus on the people who are tired of the inhumane hours and treatment, and the accompanying meager pay. Instead of putting it on the companies and government whose policies and ethics are fostering these awful conditions which engender these sorts of worker responses. It’s not quiet quitting. It’s holding boundaries between work and personal life. It’s not allowing the company to steal your time away from you. It’s preventing the company from overstepping their position in your life. It’s so many things that are important and ‘quiet quitting’ does those people a disservice in favor of a catchy corporate approved soundbite. I find that disgusting.

    • TFO Winder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I did not find any proper meaning of phrase quiet quitting

      It might as well mean - working only the amount you are paid for - which sounds totally reasonable.

      Totally corporate worded article.

      • TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s a phrase meant to replace the old phrase “working your wage”, because that way of viewing it makes the whole situation less dramatic and more noble … and generates less clicks. Classic newsspeak.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I always took it to mean “doing the least amount of work possible without getting fired.” If someone’s making an effort to work the amount they’re paid for, I wouldn’t consider it quiet quitting.

  • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You miss spelled it… Its not quiet quitting… Its doing what’s necessary and nothing excess… if you aren’t paid for it

      • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know if this was the intention, but that came off a bit condescending in my opinion. I completely agree with you, present tense would have been more apt (I’m going to edit it to fix it), but I resent the way your correction was presented. If that was not your intention, I apologize. I’m tired this morning.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    From the original reporting in the Japan Times:

    Some 45% of full-time employees in Japan are “quiet quitters” — workers doing the bare minimum to meet their job requirements

    Oh, no! People are doing their jobs! What a disaster!

    • doctortofu@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I much prefer the term “acting your wage”. I’m not doing the bare minimum - I’m doing what I’m paid for. You want me to do more? Guess what, there’s one way to motivate me to do so…

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Employee burnout is a symptom of a toxic work culture, and “quiet quitting” is a corporate psyop invented to prevent you from noticing it.

      • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s corporate media term for doing what your job requires, but not giving your time to companies for free

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No one gives their time to a company for free. That’s volunteering. Getting paid doesn’t mean you’re quiet quitting.

          Quiet quitting means doing the absolute minimum not to get fired, showing no initiative or ambition. Employers often expect you to work extra hard and do a bunch of bonus work to try to get promoted or a raise. They believe all this extra work is part of what they’re paying for. But an employee who has quiet quit will do none of that, accept that the job is a dead end job, and just do the minimum to keep from getting fired.

          • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            People do give their time to companies for free- it’s called working free overtime and tons of people do it (exempt employee pain), which is why employers are not happy with the change. What my comment says is just the short version of what you’re saying- you’re doing what the job requires and no more

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            because if you’re not giving your all to the company, are you really working?

      • BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s doing the bare minimum, sometimes below the minimum so that they have to fire you. Like how you would act if your boss yelled at you for no reason and you no longer care about your job.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So is the goal to actually get fired? Or to just not go for a promotion? I’m a little confused.

          Or is it the guy from office space? “[make a guy]…work just hard enough to not get fired.”

          Edit: Oh… I’ve got a good way to help clarify this…

          Another office space reference, but I think this quantifies it well:

          So if they ask you to wear 37 pieces of flair, is quiet quitting wearing 35, 36, 37, or 38 pieces of flair?

          1. and that’s a write up for explicit underperformance and en route to being let go.

          2. is basically the same thing but could be taken as a technicality or mistake.

          3. is technically right, but a lot of shitty bosses will have a fit with their own standards and be all passive aggressive about it, and may even rock the boat until they have to fire you.

          4. is juuust above the bare minimum, so they can’t say shit, but you won’t be getting a promotion anytime soon.

          And anything above that, I’m just going to categorize as not quiet quitting for sake of simplicity. Don’t worry about performance percentages, that’s not the point here.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Quiet quitting” would be 37 or even 38 in your example. Basically doing what’s in your job description, but nothing more. Setting clear work/life boundaries where you aren’t accessible to do work for your boss/manager outside of working hours (even if they just want you to answer some emails while you’re on vacation or whatever), and not doing stuff that you aren’t qualified for/isn’t in your job description and that you aren’t getting paid extra to do.

            People have started refusing to let companies expect more than they’re paying for, and it’s pissed them off, so they’re calling it “quiet quitting.”

          • BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The goal is apathy. How can I put in the absolute minimum amount of effort to not get fired with the mindset that if I did get fired it wouldn’t be the end of the world. It generally comes from feeling like you aren’t appreciated or properly compensated from your job.

            I think the guy from office space with the “work just hard enough to not get fired” sums it up perfectly

            It’s not a new concept as office space made a joke about it in the 90s but it’s a current buzzword and becomes more applicable as the gap between C suites and average employees continues to grow

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Businesses can no longer rely solely on the goodwill of employees that they have financially and emotionally abused to the point of class collapse.”

        People are just doing the bare minimum and that’s not ok by the CEO.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know a neoliberal small business owner who was complaining that his minimum wage workers aren’t as invested as he is… I told him that was obvious: they don’t benefit from the work they do, they don’t own any of the business, and there is always more minimum wage work out there. By his own ideology, why should they care about something that gets them nothing but the bare minimum and has no intrinsic value?

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    From what I’ve read, Japan’s work ethic has been more about presenteeism than productivity for a while. While long hours are the norm, it’s more important to be seen to be working than to be productive, so you don’t leave before the boss does, but you do spend a large amount of that time staring out the window or otherwise idling.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is also going away (and it’s less staring out the window and more pretending to be busy), but it’s not going to happen overnight, particularly where the micro-managing dinosaurs are still in control. I’ve worked at two (fairly westernized) Japanese companies and have not seen this personally, but know many who have.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I always used to get from bosses, “Hicks! How come you’re not working?”

      I go, “There’s nothing to do!”

      And they go, “Well, you pretend like you’re working.”

      Yeah, why don’t you pretend I’m working? You get paid more than me, you fantasize, buddy! Hell, pretend I’m mopping! Knock yourself out! I’ll pretend they’re buying stuff, we can close up! Hey, I’m the boss, now you’re fired! How’s that for a fantasy, buddy?

      • Bill Hicks
    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been reading more about the job market in Spain lately and it sounds like they have a similar problem. Not nearly to the extent that Japan does, but similar attitudes about being at work for unnecessarily long hours even if there’s no real point. There doesn’t appear to be any reward, either. I don’t blame people for declining to participate.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I worked at a place where basically every other department would stand in the lobby at 4:58 PM, waiting for accounting (which was on the other side of the building) to leave. If you didn’t wait, the CEO would likely see you from his office window and you’d be getting a “talking to” by your supervisor the next day. I have never before or since worked anywhere where I’ve seen so much collective time wasting, trying to keep up the appearance of being busy.

      This was an American company. I don’t miss that shit hole in the slightest.

      • Shirasho@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        America has a mentality of “I’m paying you for your time, not the quality of your work.” Even if you complete the work assigned to you they will throw a hissy fit if you leave one minute early because that is one minute they are paying you that you arent available if something goes wrong.

        It’s all ass backwards because it is cheaper in the short term to pay for cheap labor with low reliability and high availability than for expensive labor with high reliability and medium to low availability. If you take the high availability away from the former you are left with nothing.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Which, as a salaried engineer, is the stupidest fucking thing ever, and something I’ve dealt with over the vast majority of my career. You pay me to solve problems, not warm a chair and look over my shoulder. If you give me stupid metrics to hit (coughRTO metricscough), I’m going to maliciously comply and hit them in a stupid way that you won’t like, but that still abides by the rules and regs. If you are the problem, I will solve you.

          • Shirasho@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            RTO metrics are more often than not about tax breaks, not that your boss wants to hover over you. By coming into the office you have a chance of stimulating the local economy and the government cuts taxes in return, but only if there are metrics showing that a certain percentage of your local staff are coming in. It is all really stupid, antiworker, and driven by money.

            I am barely getting away with not returning to the office, but my company is cracking down on it. The moment they take my bonus or otherwise reprimand me is the moment I put in my notice.

          • theolodis@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s what I don’t understand about all this RTO. If a company foces me to come to the office 5 days, I might comply, but I will for sure stop working hard when I am on the office, unless I really love what I am doing, and they pay me a shit ton of money.

            If a company wastes my time, I’ll waste theirs.

        • Willy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          depends on what you do. I’ve only seen that when working at a corporate grocery store as a teen. after that I’ve been surprised how it wasn’t that way at all even though I was always told in school it would be that way. every other workplace I’ve been in (office jobs) has treated everyone like an adult. get your work done and do it well and do what you need to do that. I’ve been pretty lucky I guess

        • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Doing a good job is also self-defeating.

          Managers want to see you grow every year. If you do your best early on in your career, you will hurt your ability to show growth that’s visible to management. Therefore, the optimal solution is to do a better job by a barely perceptible amount every year, staying under your maximum quality output until you’re retired/dead.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man, fuck all those guys for doing their job to a sufficient quality and quantity to not get fired, eh?

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well productivity is a good thing, I think the problem is the incentives. Their government essentially funnels all the money to their elderly via monetary policy, and the youth get the table scraps.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not listed in the article but, starting around corona, price increases started happening all over the place. Russia’s attack on Ukraine also caused price increases here for a number of reasons. Rice is now around double what it was a year ago (https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/3949/ – some general price increase, also shortages due to weather and shitty planning). The news keeps talking about price increases every month. Wages? Hardly budging. People are getting a lower quality of life for the same amount of work so of course the desire to put up with bullshit is dropping.

    Now, if people would vote for anyone else, we might see something happen. Voter turnout is terrible in Japan. As a non-citizen, I can’t vote so nothing I can do there. (Technically, there are some local elections that non-citizens can vote in (I think all requiring permanent residency permits) but nothing at an upper level).

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s protectionism and, yes, that’s part of what I meant by “shitty planning” above. There is American, Thai, Indian, and Korean rice here now. Calrose is a popular one. Same is true for butter and similar things here.

        Edit: I accidentally a word.

          • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I live in the rural Tohoku inaka and personally mostly get genmai from Costco (which I prefer over white rice). Online stores (Rakuten, Kakuyasu, amazon, etc.) have it. For in-person, it’s what I’ve seen people talking about and seen mentioned on the news.

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The phrase “quiet quitting” really grinds my gears. Are you fulfilling the terms of your employment contract? Yes? Then you’re working, and haven’t quit.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not quiet quitting, I’m doing exactly the work I am paid to do and no more of the extra stuff I’m not paid to do.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yea, every article using the term quiet quitting is getting a down vote. Doing what you’re paid for is simply doing your job. This is basically akin to getting mad you didn’t get a tip. A TIP IS OPTIONAL.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doing just what you’re paid for and not one bit more is called “Work to Rule” and it’s just total bullshit that it’s an effective labour tactic of resistance, because it implies that exploitation is part of the expectation in capitalism.

      People want to do a good job and employers milk that.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re doing exactly as much as required? How rude of you.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, that’s not what quiet quitting is. Quiet quitting is doing the bare minimum to not get fired from your job, which is different from the bare minimum that would be reasonably expected of you. Most of the time, if your employer actually knew how much work you were doing, they would want to fire you, and it would be for-cause, because you are doing essentially nothing.

      This is possible because many workplaces have very little accountability. One of the classic moves is to always be working on multiple projects - so anytime someone asks you to do something, you say “I dunno how quickly I’ll be able to get that done, I’m pretty swamped from X” - at which point everyone sagely nods and agrees that the team working on X is definitely swamped.

      If your bosses actually knew that you were just lying, and were spending 7.5 hours everyday playing video games, you’d be fired. But since they don’t know that, you can keep getting paid for showing up to a few meetings every week. That’s what quiet quitting is.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thank goodness. Now when im napping during work I can feel less guilty thinking about Japan doing it too.