• Telemachus93@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What the actual fuck? This idiot may have his braindead opinions and do to his OSS project whatever he wants (so sag I wasn’t on the list), but that is just such a fucked up thing to do.

      • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am not sure what the other preventative actions have been taken. Is it feasible to defederate from this and any other instance that is administered from this person who has virtually attacked the flotilla?

        • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The website has been taken down so that particular vector has been removed. The related startrek.website instance defederated from db0 and other instances have defederated from st.w due to all this.

          The individual had at least 2 known alt accounts, so it’s likely they have more and will pop back up like a noxious weed.

      • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not to expose anything that’s best left internal, but is this something the proof of work check handles? Is it something that’s been implemented in advance? Just curious, if you can talk about it at all. I’m woefully undereducated on the actual ins and outs of the web.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          For this kind of stuff you can easily ask an llm and it will give you a pretty decent rundown of mitigation tactics

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Just thought it would be the cherry on top if this final outburst was automatically blocked by a mitigation measure that was already there.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They can block requests from a specific origin or implement tailored rate limiting rules or disable CORS from that instance. Probably more too

          • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The problem is that this is a client side javascript-based attack - meaning your browser sends these malicious requests. So a DDOS, not “just” a regular (centralized) DOS. Anyone opening the page with javascript turned on (which is 99% of real users, however for Lemmy the statistic’s surely a bit better) is an “attacker”.

            You can - once you know of the nature of the attack (this one’s relatively simplistic), just react to any realistic-looking request and block ignore the malicious ones - in this case garbled rng output.

            Rate limiting would only lead to what the attacker wants - legit users (who are unknowingly sending these malicious requests) being blocked from accessing the site.

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m confused. dubvee.org is down and the tesseract repo was also pulled. How is this being deployed? What instances are hosting this version of tesseract?

    I would like to see this javascript myself because DDOSing with open source code in your name is a whole new level of unwise.

    Also wtf is up with the 100 - 1 + 1 expression? Is this some weird JavaScript quirk?

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dubvee is down down now (server not responding), but prior to that the site had a really bitchy “farewell” message. The DDOS was embedded javascript code your browser would run when you visited dubvee.org and viewed the message.

      Archive.org has a snapshot of it, but it still has that javascript embedded so I’m not going to link to it. Here’s a screenshot of the site when this code was included.

    • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also wtf is up with the 100 - 1 + 1 expression? Is this some weird JavaScript quirk?

      If searching online for a JS random number generator code, something like Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1) ) + min; is the most common result. If you’re lazy or don’t care, you just fill in the min and max and get that 100 - 1 + 1

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think the DDoS code was FOSS. I think their frontpage index.html was set to a static html file just for the flounce.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It just gets worse and worse. I figured that the goodbye message he posted wouldn’t be the end of it. Thankfully it seems to be down now so it’s not causing harm anymore directly but still.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This whole thing reminds me of the guy (Angled/LMAO) 3 years ago that was all butthurt after he got busted trying to take all the good sublemmy names, and responded by posting a bunch of disgusting stuff with alts and DOSing lemmy.world.

    Edit https://lemmy.world/post/1720870

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He kept claiming they’re AP, but refused to provide proof. Not sure but as it happens, startrek.website defederated us as soon as we banned him.

          • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Huh, weird how the framing of the defedederation lines up so well to what ap and Kirk would say.

            https://startrek.website/post/42709922

            If you’re not familiar with how Lemmy/the Fediverse works, basically everything you read at StarTrek.website is hosted by us, even if the content originated elsewhere. That means we are responsible for everything here and we have to decide if we are comfortable boosting content from other instances.

            If you’re curious, the final straw here was learning that db0 explicitly allows hosting discussions about hurting people, which needless to say goes against our instance values and we simply don’t have the manpower to moderate that volume of content incoming from their server to a degree that we feel meets our quality standards, which left defederating as the only viable option.

            In keeping in line with past trends we’re announcing this because is is a larger instance and don’t want to leave any of the crew confused as to why something may be missing.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Startrek.website is probably also run by Admiral Patrick, or maybe he’s just someone with admin access there. Either way they seem like bad news, that site should definitely be avoided.

              • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I don’t think I’ve heard anything positive about the instance so completely unsurprised by what they did AND how they were happy to blame db0 for everything while continuing darvo.

                Only sad this comment didn’t federate before the post was locked

                So this user of yours will also be banned for not following the instance values?

                https://startrek.website/u/kirk

                Specifically not following authenticity, ie saying they’re a different user but could be trying to increase the moderation you may need to do, and extremely disrespectful, unless that value only counts towards members of this instance.

                This is being brought up specifically as while yes you are a small instance non of this apart from that user would bring traffic here you would need to moderate so it seems as if you are just doing this to cut off a large portion of the fediverse explicitly against principles those in star trek would be for.

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What a loser. Tiny whiny loser.

    Fabulous reaction time from db0 & team!

    So who is this loser, I mean it’s a tiny whiny bit illegal what he did it seems…

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gotta say, I’ve enjoyed this whole drama. This seems like the end of the story arc. It’s been fun guys. Better than beans.