In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    when the ‘leader’ of the country is a known csam perpetrator, i’m sure it emboldens those members of the public with similar mental leanings

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Grok has as much guardrails against CSAM as any other Ai. This is money grab lawsuit and nothing more.

    Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images,

    That is bullshit as fuck. At his point any moron with decent GPU can make images with no guardrails at all.

    Filthy cynical money grab. They try to cash in on the dead pedo.

    • Koarnine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      All the other major ai platforms with such ease of access do definitely have significantly more guardrails. Any proof of what you are saying?

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    On one hand, this is great news, he’s no longer here to be gross.

    On the other hand, could these images have served as an outlet for his perversion, and kept his step-daughter safe for years?

    On the other other hand, was access to this what twisted him? Was he reasonable at one time?

    He did the right thing in the end, this was the best possible outcome for everyone.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Read this last bit again: "Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.” He traded them for CSAM of other girls.

    • Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Geez, if only there were alternatives to ai generated csam, like therapy and medication??

      Yes, it’s not a perfect fix, and it is hard, but people overcome drug addictions with therapy and meds, and I am pretty sure that nothing beats heroin…

      • Christian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d bet that the societal stigma actually makes it more difficult than heroin in spite of the raw addictiveness. Society does look down on drug addicts, but there’s still a decent chunk of people who will be understanding and rooting for them sincerely when they’re trying to overcome it. I have to imagine it would be infinitely harder to find just one person you feel safe asking for help, much less an entire community.

        I have to think they’d be much less dangerous in a society more willing to differentiate between pedophilia and predation just because of how much of a difference community support can make. If they feel like the only people they can open up to are other pedophiles, that’s probably not a recipe for hearing healthy perspectives.

        On the other hand, it’s probably easier for me to say this stuff from my armchair with no children of my own and not even interacting with any children on a regular basis.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Geez, if only there were alternatives to ai generated csam, like therapy and medication??

        Would medication even help in this case? We don’t really have medication that can affect sexuality in that fine-grained a way.

      • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Is there evidence therapies and medication actually help their desires for CSAM? I don’t know if there’s great research in either direction

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Would it even be possible to ethically research such a thing in the first place? You certainly can’t just throw a battery of drugs and therapy at humans.

          Plus, research into altering sexuality to that degree verges into quite uncomfortable territory. It doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to think that such research could easily be misused for things like conversion therapy.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He was trading these pictures for material from others so other children were hurt in trade of his step child being victimized. She may not have been physically victimized but her likeness was portrayed in CSAM which now she knows about and is going to damage her mentally.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I really hope France fucks them up. In France, there is no question about the illegal status of fictional csam, it is illegal.

      • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Those idiots think this should be legal, but not when the civilians do it. Tim Sweeny probably is only piping up because he insist on posting the stupidest thing his brain can come up with every day.

        In no way shape or form has elon tried to dampen or stop this from happening to this day. He just made it so only paid users not in the united States can keep producing csam.

        And trump wants this. This is the mysterious Ai progress we keep hearing about, next to price fixing, and survalience. States are not allowed to regulate Ai, and people will tell you that you are a dangerous person for trying to suggest that elon musk should be held accountable.

        We are not all here looking for the guy who did it or confused on why this is happening. Elon musk has created a csam generator and doesnt have to stop it. Instead he just occasionally has to send one of his super fans to prison for using it the way he intended to. All to say hes doing something to stop this problem.

        7k images and videos is a lot to go unnoticed. Its almost like this is allowed on their platform and encouraged. This isn’t a “we can’t be held accountable for what our users post” problem. This is a elon musk left a loaded gun out on a table, and he should be held liable for not putting it in a gun safe. Especially when every single other mainstream llm doesnt have this problem. Its negligence to the point of being willfully ignorant. You can’t tell me they can ban you for a single comment about Israel but all the sudden their moderation isn’t the greatest when 7k images and videos where being produced?

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I mean, I guess he was trying to get one with the right number of fingers and human eyes

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      He was trading them, so it might be one image, reproduced 7000 times. Clearly that’s not the case, but he probably made fewer images, and sold them multiple times.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        No, he quite specifically made over 7000, using a single photo as the reference.

        Edit: Just to mention this is a Jane Doe added to an existing suit, and the picture was from.when she was 11, she is in her 20s now. Some articles even describe the imagery to some degree (not recommended reading BTW, I’d like to kill those brain cells).

        It was only reported by xAI after a very specific, graphic, and horrific image request was made, despite there having been thousands of others generated, they didnt share anything actionable despite multiple requests from the NCMEC and cops over the course of several months. He killed himself 2 days after his devices were searched.

        He had traded many of the over 7000 images he generated to get even more from others.

        She is one of 5 Jane Does involved in the lawsuit.

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I used to sell trust and safety and it was scary then. Now they’ve fired those teams and I’m pretty sure there’s zero moderation on the Internet besides Reddit

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Even then, Reddit seems to be trying its darndest to reduce that, and the moderation was very variable to start with.

      At the very least, the website has become much worse in recent years, thanks to the influx of LLM-powered bots, and the winding down of interfaces that a lot of third-party moderation tools used. Those tools really only existed because the inbuilt tooling was quite lacking.

      Currently, Reddit has locked their old.Reddit interface behind a login wall, and are looking to potentially shut down their RSS feeds (and likely that interface as well). A fair few moderation bots and tools make use of both those things.

      Which basically meant that the site was hit with the double-whammy of mods needing those anti-bot tools more than ever, and Reddit Co. trying to shut down external access that those tools needed, so as to keep mods on their own tools.

  • maniajack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    All the people who bought SpaceX stock invested in this. Grok is owned by SpaceX. It would be nice if journalists would put that in their articles.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Lawsuits for this need to start including shareholders as defendants. Make investing in it a civil and reputational liability.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Lawsuits for this need to start including shareholders as defendants.

        I get the sentiment, but … they kind of already are.

        Being a shareholder means you own part of the company. If the company stands to lose money from this lawsuit, then all the shareholders do as well. (That is, at least, on the somewhat naive assumption that a company’s stock price has any relation whatsoever to how much money it has and can make.)

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          When the stock value falls, they’re not immediately losing money. If they sell the stock, that’s when they either profit or lose. As long as they hold on to their stocks, there are no actualised losses.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          For shareholders and investors, the worst thing that can happen to them right now is the stock going down and having to take a loss on it. It’s bounded by however much money they put into it.

          If investing in 10 shitty companies knowing that 1 would fail manages to be more profitable than investing in 20 companies that don’t degrade the moral fabric of society, there’s a perverse incentive to keep investing in companies creating Groks. Making shareholders financially liable for the debts of their investments would introduce an unpredictable risk that could help change the equation.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Best thing that ever happened to me was getting banned off Twatter in October of 2019. (after a decade and 30 poasts, no less!)

      It was delicious that I got to refuse the “Come back to X” message that arrived in my mailbox after Musk took over and offered to reinstate the banned accounts.

      Thanks, Elon, but no.

      I’d rather have a root canal w/o anaesthesia.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    In one way, I’m glad he produced fake images of his stepdaughter, rather than force her to produce real photographs.

    But this part is still very upsetting:

    the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If those images could be made without a sample set of real CSAM, I probably wouldn’t have as much of an issue with it, but some child suffered for that. In addition, they were intentionally based on a real child’s face and that could come back to the child, makes it even worse.

      • Viceversa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        but some child suffered for that

        You do realise that that implying neural networks were trained on a CSAM?

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I don’t envy the poor employees who had to do that.

            Though it does also raise the inevitable question of how it made it into the training data to begin with.

        • Twiglet@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They are. It’s a known issue that gets brushed aside by people that want to use the unlimited csam generator.

  • 0li0li@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A major company makes CSAM generation platfor and sharing network, yet it does not get seized or closed by any government entity. Makes sense.

    • Flatulent69Iguana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This has nothing to do with grok… Elon can go fuck himself but this issue is not going away. You can train your own ai models, you can download uncensored models. This is how it is now. And ai is still new and very basic compared to future potential. If it scares you now give it 10 years and everyone will be able to do whatever they want on models they have trained themselves running on a phone. Ai is just yet another invention that changed the world, people need to start dealing… This will change everything, and not just the jobs you think it can take. The newly unemployed will take the other ones too, so either learn or sit back and cry.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s for powerful people who are in government or paid off the right people. That’s why it’s allowed to exist. Until Elon loses his usefulness (aka money) and they need an excuse to bring him down.

      That’s my conspiratorial $.02