• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I cant wait for when time as a concept gets condemned for killing our dumbfuck president.

    • Zagorath@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah that seems to be how Wikipedia does things. It tripped me up earlier today on a different page. Bizarre. Just go left to right, top to bottom. Reading order.

      • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I believe this is because many languages will interpret that differently, and Wikipedia having contributors from around the world writing in different languages, decided that clockwise is a good universal instruction that is more difficult to mistranslate.

        If the instructions were “left to right” and then “top to bottom”, a bad translation might end up making it mean the top to bottom first and left go right last.

        Reading order

        In Arabic (and a few other languages too), things are read RTL, and plenty of Asian languages, at least traditionally, are read top to bottom first.

        Doing it clockwise is seen as a more universal instruction I guess? And I don’t think it’s too hard to figure out. I might also be to make the instruction more concise!

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Wikipedia has entirely different versions in different languages. This page is on the English Wikipedia.

          • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago
            1. having something consistent can reduce confusion among contributors, particularly for those who are translating pages between languages and

            2. there are other reasons too, like making the instruction more concise

      • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Clockwise order isn’t the same as reading order. The correct order is:

        1. The top left image (because it says “from top left”)
        2. The top right image
        3. The bottom right image
        4. The bottom left corner

        It helps if you imagine a circle around the images with arrows pointing in clockwise direction, like this:

        Drawing of 4 squares in a 2x2 grid, which represent the pictures. A circle with arrows pointing in a clockwise direction surrounds the squares. The squares are numbered according to the order described above.

        (EDIT: I made a correction to the drawing. I put the wrong order in the original drawing.)

        They could have just put the images in reading order though, especially when there are only 4 of them. It would be way less confusing :/

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Clockwise order isn’t the same as reading order

          Yes, I know. That’s what my comment is criticising.

          • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking about in which order you’re supposed to “read” the pictures. I only understood it now.

          • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            “Clockwise” is universally known by all cultures, reading order varies.

            So when translating to a different language, you can’t just say reading order, you have to change the article instead of just translating

            • Zagorath@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              That’s how Wikipedia works. Each language is an entirely separate article, maintained by entirely separate people. Not a simple translation of English Wikipedia.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      ICE needs to get in there and arrest that algae, none of it has proper paperwork and they’re making ol shitpants look bad.