If demons were real and had pets, this guy would look just like one of their dogs.
Why is „psychopath” put in quotes?
It’s put in quotes because it’s a quote. Hope that helps.
Seriously, why does hardly anyone on this website know how to read headlines? Quotes mean it’s a direct quote and commas are used as shorthand for ‘and’.
Remember that the Greater Israel Project is about the chosen ones owning most of the land in the Middle East and genociding the current occupants. Palestine is the most immediate goal of the project, but the Lebanese, Syrians, Iraqis, Egyptians, etc. are also part of the plan.
Imagine a colony of narcissts with a victim complex who are granted complete immunity for their actions and you end up with Israel.
And MAGA.
And Russia
And my dad!
And my axe!
I bet there are so many psychopaths up in the tippy top.
Hitler 2.
Electric Boogaloo
Oh no, he was slammed??! Was he also owned, sent a message, taken to task, and other things that mean someone said something that he ignored and went right back to what he was doing?
tldr; I’m so tired of these Wrestlemania headlines of completely consequence free replies to people being terrible. Wake us when any bad person experiences anything approaching accountability.
But he was blasted, I tell you! Roasted, totally torn apart!
what about the psycho benjamin.
Genocide has the side effect of keeping him out of prison
He said that Israel is doing everything they possibly can to prevent making civilian casualties. Surely he would not lie, right?
Israel does not have a right to exist.
Israel has a right to go fuck itself right in the ass with a grenade launcher.
Israel does not have a right to exist.
This is like saying unions don’t have the right to exist because of police unions. Don’t let the existence of corruption rob an entire group of the right to exist. If Israel didn’t exist, every country would go right back to treating Jews the way they’ve always treated them. Demand the downfall of the ethnonationalists, not the nations being used to justify ethnonationalism.
If Israel didn’t exist, every country would go right back to treating Jews the way they’ve always treated them.
bullshit, jews already live all over the world and antisemitism was well under control until Israel’s current government decided to speedrun their palestinian genocide
You’re either disingenuous, or a fool
Terrible example! Israel is intertwined with the worst most violent and intrusive components of policing. They use Palestine as a laboratory to run experiments about how to oppress people. A key component of a global network of repression and imiseration. It is one of the ways the evil project is insinuated into everybody’s lives, even if you do not consider Arabs to be full humans. Which is a required assumption to be writing comments such as the above.
Abolish the police and abolish Israel.
What a fucking joke. The world persecuted Jews is the reason they have to genocide, ethnically cleanse, and colonize Palestine?
Do Palestinians get to choose a people to do that to? When do we stop with this stupid loop?
Who would have thought that lesson they would take from the Holocaust would be to Pay It Forward?
What a fucking joke. The world persecuted Jews is the reason they have to genocide, ethnically cleanse, and colonize Palestine?
Do you not see a difference between “right to exist” and “commit genocide”?
We do but Israel doesn’t seem to. It has been carrying out Genocide since it’s inception. The only time it has been attacked was during the first arab war, Yom Kippur war. Rest have been belligerence of the US and European colony of Israel.
We do but Israel doesn’t seem to
Oh, yeah, silly me, I forgot that Israel is a hive-mind and if Netanyahu and the right-wing extremists want to eradicate Palestine, then ALL Israelis want that too!
It has been carrying out Genocide since it’s inception
The word has lost all its meaning, I see. “They’re doing bad things” == “Genocide”.
The International Court of Justice has said it’s a Genocide. Ethinically cleansing of a population is not just a bad thing it is the literal definition of Genocide.
If you want to change the definition I am sure you would also mean Holocaust was also just a bad thing.
European should stop pushing it’s problem elsewhere and take care of it by themselves.
The International Court of Justice has said it’s a Genocide
In 2025.
If you want to change the definition I am sure you would also mean Holocaust was also just a bad thing.
I’m not changing anything. I’m agreeing with the ICJ. You’re changing the meaning of the word to be “bad things are happening” since you’re claiming that Israel “has been carrying out Genocide since [Palestine’s] inception”.
Which is ludicrous considering they had independent elections, and a population boom of going from 600k to 5 million in 100 years.
Bull fucking shit. Israel is stolen land, taken during the Nakba after Palestinians were kind enough to welcome Jewish refugees from Europe. It has no fucking right to exist any more than the US or any other conquering nation does.
Israel is stolen land, taken during the Nakba after Palestinians were kind enough to welcome Jewish refugees from Europe
Israelis lived in that area for at least 3000 years.
Yeah, except the word changed to Palestinians. Some converted to Christianity, most converted to Islam, and plenty of ethnic mixing happened between the beginning of the diaspora and the nakhba, on both sides.
Yup! And since both nations want independence, why would only one be allowed to have it?
The problem is that the world has been completely blind to the crimes Israel has been committing, slowly encroaching on Palestinian land.
What needs to happen is the removal of current heads of Israeli state, ideally by execution for all the crimes against humanity they committed, a new democratic election on both sides of the fence (reminder: Palestinians enjoyed their last election in 2008 when Hamas took over and installed religious dictatorship), and then the establishment of a UN-coordinated force, ideally culturally neutral (like Japan/China/Korea) to ensure that the borders are respected.
One is a nation other is a settler colony.
Which is which? Palestinians didn’t exist as a nation (it was “the region of Palestine”, not a country) until the exact same UN resolution that created Israel. Which, fun fact, does have historical records of existence in the region… So? Which ones are the settlers?
European Jews didn’t, don’t quote religious books or Persians, Egyptian have more rights over that region than Jews.
Religious books…? Are you confusing the Kingdom of Israel with the biblical “United Kingdom of Israel”?
The existence of Kingdom of Israel is an ongoing academic debate and has no connection to the current Israel if at all they existed.
The land was Egyptian before Jewish. So they have a more ancient right over that land. Maybe Syrians before them.
Yeah, so you’re confusing the Kingdom of Israel, which is mentioned in Assyrian records, on the Moabite Stone, etc., etc.
The land was Egyptian before Jewish. So they have a more ancient right over that land. Maybe Syrians before them.
Yup. Which just highlights how stupid the whole “someone has the right to a territory because of [historical reasons]” is.
Reality is super simple: the right to a territory belongs to those who can obtain that territory and hold it. That’s how it always worked throughout history, even if we’re now trying to sugarcoat things by pretending that’s not the case. If russia didn’t fumble the full-scale war with Ukraine as bad as they had, and if Ukraine didn’t receive the support they did, within the next 5-10 years nobody would be talking about “occupied Ukraine”, it’d be just “russia”.
Poland moved a couple hundred kilometers to the west after the Second World War, Germany’s borders are completely different than they used to be, Great Britain lost its colonies - nobody gives a fuck about any “ancient right”, it’s literally only about power (both in terms of military capability, as well as diplomatic ability to negotiate and resolve conflicts).
And with that out of the way, the reality is this: Palestine received a nation state in the exact same UN resolution that created Israel. One has the exact same right to exist as the other - their diplomatic effort gave them these nations and that’s that.
What now needs to happen is for the UN to actually enforce its mandates by securing the borders at least as long as it takes Palestine to rebuild.
To which date, specifically, should we reset nations and borders, in your opinion?
Before the British divided the Arab lands and gave it to Europeans.
Pedantic argument. There’s no specific date to “reset”. You and I are both well aware of who is an oppressor and who the land was stolen from.
Land back to all Native peoples, fuck the Eurocentric hegemony created by European imperialism.
Who are the natives, in this instance?
Land back to all Native peoples
The Kingdom of Israel existed there up until 720 BCE. Israelis and Jews lived in that area effectively “always”, just like the Palestinians. Returning “land back to all Native peoples” would mean exactly what we did - establishing a Palestine AND an Israel.
What’s missing right now is the UN to get off its arse and ensure that they remain separate, without Israel encroaching on Palestinian land.
It ended is existence in 720 BCE. Current State of Israel has no relation to it other than name. Majority of the Jews staying there today are Europeans.
Majority of Jews are Europeans because they got kicked out of their home in the 15th-16th century.
But now we have a conundrum! You’re saying that “State of Israel has no relation to it other than name”, and that is - from what I understand - your argument towards there being no Israel as the solution to the issues, right?
But that means Palestine should be eliminated too considering it never existed as a nation at all in the entire history of humanity.
So, which is it? Are we keeping your methodology and giving back the entire territory to Iran, or are we agreeing that it’s stupid fucking methodology?
Why separate them? bring Kanaan back and if the Jews don’t like it they can go farming in the hills again.
Eat a dick
No, it’s a valid question, Jews also used to live in that land millennia ago.
I used to live in your house. Give back to me now.
Did you used to own the house and then were kicked out of it by force by a third party that never owned even part of the house?
1947
Why that date specifically?
There was no Israel before that. Kingdom of Israel has ceased to exist thousands of years before.
What’s the cut-off time in years for when the existence of something classifies as “there was X before that” vs “there was no X before that”?
OK, I see you’re a bit slower than some. No worries! Let’s try this: what makes 1947 a more significant date than, say, 750 BCE?
States don’t have a right to exist, especially ethno supremacist ones.
Fine. First, rename Israel to Lebanon and I’ll let you have your wish.
“declared that “all Lebanon must burn” shortly after four Israeli soldiers were killed in a fight with Hezbollah.”
Look, nobody wants their people getting killed, but here’s a wild idea… Get your people the fuck out of Lebanon!
You can’t invade another country then bitch about your forces being resisted.
Yeah, this never occurred to our leaders here in the US during the War on Terror either, and they warmongering in seven countries at once. It can get a whole lot worse, but I hope that doesn’t happen.
Or as some called it war of terror
A fair criticism.
I think I might have stolen that from Borat
slammed
I hate that human beings like this exist.
It’s a literal bonfire of the vanities. The bigotry, the smugness, and the violence are all part of a self-mythologizing narrative used to build support for increasingly awful people. Guys like Ben-Gvir are in power precisely because they’re the biggest assholes the country has to offer. They draw in other assholes like a magnet and build a movement based on that collective awfulness, even as their country self-destructs and takes out every neighbor in a 500 mile radius.
They’re „protecting their borders”. Like Russia
They’re very similar in many aspects. BTW do you know what characterises a secure Soviet border?
Are you referring to the satellite buffer zone? Or is this a joke about Nazis in winter?
„A secure Soviet border has Soviet soldiers on both sides.” Give me the joke about Nazis too ;)
A secure soviet border is behind a line of snowmen in SS uniforms.
The issue is not that we have deranged human beings. As societies, we can handle these cases.
The issue is we keep promoting them: Minister in Israel, President in the US, billionaires, trillionaire, …
Exactly. Every society has this strata of psychos who are constantly angling for power. A healthy society understands this and keeps them under control.
But now and then, a society weakens, and these people gain power, and it’s always the same. In the 1930’s it was the Nazis, in the 2010s it was MAGA.
It is important to keep these people crushed at all times, and not feel badly about it. These people do not deserve our empathy, or access to our rights, so they can abuse, manipulate, and violate them. We know where their “free speech” leads us, and we don’t have to tolerate it.
A healthy society is not polite to political psychopaths.
The issue is we keep promoting them: Minister in Israel, President in the US, billionaires, trillionaire, …
i blame the not interested in politics assholes.
Absolutely
Mentally lazy cunts who are complacent, and perfectly happy for others to suffer so long as they’re ok
Worst neighbors ever.
What’s with the quotes? He is a psychopath. It’s not up for a discussion
“You are a psychopath and one of the greatest threats to the security of Israel and of Jewish people around the world,” journalist Yashar Ali wrote in response to Ben-Gvir.
It’s in quotes because it’s a quote.
Except there is no quote in the title, therefore this logic doesn’t apply
… But there’s two quotations in the title?
