• rangber@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      I didn’t read the whole doc. How would this prevent kill switch network if the government can just tell internet service providers to shutdown the network?

  • iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    I looked at the technology used by the EU age verification.

    You prove your age to the app by scanning the NFC in your passport. No government servers exist.

    When a site requests your age, you return only a “yes I’m older than 18”, proven by your passport. Not your age, just that you’re older.

    I think it preserves privacy pretty well.

    I don’t think that it will protect children, but I do think that it preserves privacy.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I found some other articles that didn’t ask for my email.

      That’s unfortunate. I was actually about to get Protonvpn next month. I did a quick search on Nordvpn and I can’t find anything about supporting or praising Republicans.

      I looked into the features and specs of a lot of VPNs and it came down to those two. I was going to use Proton so I could set up my own mail and other accounts. Guess I’m using Nord

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The death of anonymity for most people, yes. Not me though. I’m going to make my own internet. With blackjack. And hookers. And protonmail too, probably.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Over LoRa it’s useful for basic off-grid messaging, but the bandwidth is extremely limited.

        A meshnet over the internet would have more bandwidth. Various things have been tried. I2P is a kind of logical meshnet over the internet.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I mean, the fediverse that you’re already on already kind of is the ground floor. Most of these places are not going to be affected by age verification.

        But if you want to climb a few floors up to where the blackjack and hookers are probably hanging out, there are things like I2P it’s delightfully sketchy. the best kind of sketchy.

        It actively divests itself from any centralized shit like SSL or DNS, it’s a raw HTTP only darknet that operates through its own peer-to-peer proxy network, totally anonymized and encrypted and segregated from any hint of open network traffic.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That makes no sense, when the age verification is being pushed to the OS and ISP levels.

          Sure, you can connect to Lemmy, and not have to prove your identity to Lemmy, but Windows users will have to prove to microsoft, and also you’ll have to prove it to Verizon, or Comcast, or whomever your ISP is.

          So before you even turn on your computer, you’ve already proved your identity twice.

          • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t have to worry about my OS because it’s open source. Yours should be too. They can’t actually enforce age verification on an open source OS because my OS can lie, and I can use its source code to make it lie if I have to (which I won’t, because many other people will do it for me). For that matter they’ll find ways to make Windows lie too, but you still shouldn’t be using it, it’s shit.

            I don’t have to worry about my ISP either because I live in a still-civilized country, but yeah, if they really lock it down at that level that’s going to be tough, you’ll probably have to identify someone for that if that’s the next place where they go to. There are countermeasures and workarounds though. VPN, mesh networking, borrowing somebody else’s wifi or mobile data hotspot, finding open networks. Maybe we’ll get to the point where we need point to point links, pirate satellites, datajacking ourselves into communication lines, who knows.

            But we’re not there yet. We’ll continue to develop more countermeasures as these sorts of hostile police surveillance state measures encroach on our freedom as it becomes necessary. You don’t have to let your identity be associated with anything beyond your ISP if you’re only using your ISP to get to somewhere you do trust with a VPN. If they block VPNs, then we will find other ways around the blocks. Are you familiar with I2P? If you aren’t, maybe you should get familiar with it. We already have plenty of ways of sneaking information into and out of even more totalitarian of states like China, Russia, at least until there’s an absolute shutdown like in Iran. You should also consider not living in a totalitarian country, and doing what you can to stop yours from becoming more totalitarian, because it’s only going to get harder the longer you let them do this. Give them your ID in exchange for internet access for now if you absolutely have to and can’t find any other option, but you might not absolutely have to, yet. And if you do have to, do it with caution: start learning and planning what you’re going to have to do after that and how you’re going to get very active in your resistance to being monitored and observed.

            You sound like you’ve got a little bit of learned helplessness, but people in shitty, scary countries have been dealing with this for a long, long time. Yes, it sucks, but it’s not the end of freedom. You have to learn how to fight it.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Ugh. That’s disgusting on a thousand levels. Even proposing such a bill should be considered a jailable violation of the constitution, as an example to the rest of the authoritarian bastards.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I mean, I agree with you, but this isn’t just a United States thing. China has had this since forever. They have something called a “social credit score”.

              So if you litter, and cameras catch you littering, your social credit goes down. And you best believe they track and monitor every single online interaction.

              The UK the past year has been really slamming hard on online verification.

              This is a global thing that is seeping into the united states, but it’s by no means the only point of contention.

              • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Oh yeah, 1000%.

                It really sucks seeing supposed democratic nations having this forced on them. I really hate how little people understand the implications in practice.

                China’s “cameras up everyone’s nose” approach should be a sign of failure and a caution to the world, not permission for other governments to “catch up”. :(

    • voidsignal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      yea. I already have my own internet with blackjack ans hooker and don’t really much on anything else. I’ll be fine. But the vast majority of people will willingly rush into 1984 instead of throwing their shit devices away.

      Oh that sweet scrolling rush…

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not sure why you’re being downvoted.

        Proton CEO praised a Trump admin. I prefer my net neutrality folks to not ever kiss the ring of any government.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The poor police forces and intelligence agencies can’t firebomb your house when you’re talking bad about the pedo class online without your ID attached.

      Billionaires and politicians are people too, you know :'(

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The age verification is really just an alternate means for these companies to try to find out which of us are real people or not with the intent to scrape AI training materials more “cleanly”. But it’s all moot in the long run, as it turns out that it will be easy for anyone who wants to break the law to pretend to be someone they aren’t.

    In a world where identity theft is more rampant than ever, you’d have to be some kind of numbskull to think that this will be effective at doing any of the intended affects. It’s literally a complete waste of time & money.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No shit. Proton is a garbage company though, not to be trusted. But thanks for the assist.