That was my first thought as well. Label corruption as DEI to try to use it as a get out of jail free card.

He reviews anything the AI flags. As I already mentioned, the AI client is looking for financial risks. ie: a contract committing the company to something it doesn’t have the capability of delivering on. I used to do something very similar. One obvious example would be a customer asking for unlimited liability. Company can’t commit to that because it could bankrupt the company.

I thought it would be clear because it’s a contract, but we are talking about financial risks, not health risks. He is using a corporate trained AI client. When the AI client finds an issue he (the human) still reviews it. According to my buddy his productivity has improved by over 25%.

I have a buddy who uses AI to read through contracts to identify high risk commitments that might cost the company money. There are thousands more uses .

They’re not sending their best.

Very frustrating for sure. Like any tool, it’s up to humans to know when the tool is useful.

There you go. The story is so much more believable now. /s

Please do feel free to repost the story from a source you find acceptable.

AI is here, another tool to use…the correct way. Very reasonable approach from Torvalds.

It certainly isn’t clear. I’m not going to accept a story from a source I’ve never heard of without scrutiny.

There’s a part of me that wants it to be true because I truly despise this administration, but it still deserves a critical eye.

You can’t even blame your human accountant.

I can only imagine the kind of mess they left the room in, but you would think a call to the coach would have happened.

The industrial carbon tax hasn’t been removed. The carbon taxes placed on food production are still in place.

Forestry Service just talks to a reorganization in an effort to streamline. The article from this thread is filled with wild claims that originally appeared in a Facebook post.

Taxing food production to increase the price of food is not going to save the planet.

Removing the carbon tax on food production is investing in basic necessities. Lowering the costs means lower prices at the til.

A quick google search will give you the history.

Really enjoy WXRV 95.9 The River Boston. You can stream from a number of sources.

It is considered international for transit passage.

They collect a tax bonanza because of the increase in the price of gas. Then they can give some of it back and play hero. Far better to scrap the industrial carbon tax which affects the price of everything, including food.