Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    “Pedophilia has been trending downward since epstien files were mentioned…”

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    More teens became smart and self aware enough to not get pregnant in so young age by effectively using different types of contraception. And guy says that this is a bad thing. What? 🫪

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Nowhere in the US can 15 year olds legally consent to sex. The age of consent is 16, 17, or 18 depending on the state. This moron is literally supporting child rape.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “We beat teen pregnancy!” - “Oh no!”

    Elaborated: “Oh no! Fewer poverty-locked consumer slaves! Who do we convince breast feeding is unhealthy and peddle formula to? How will we paint immigration as a bad thing if unemployment goes down? What if - heaven forbid - social mobility goes up?”

  • justadudeingear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Thats all they care about. Bodies to feed the machine. Gross psychophants. Course kids are more conscious of pregnancy. Just cause theyre young you think theyll give their kids up to governemtn to fight some selfish bigoted war just to die, then work poverty levels never own a home just to feed the 401K of some billionaire while theyre surviving on cheese and crackers. Ugh I HATE these people!!!

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I have a female coworker and her daughter is currently eight months pregnant at 14 with a 17-year-old father. She couldn’t be happier. She is also a hardcore republican and a diehard Trump supporter.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Ruin your kids life early that is the republican motto. Trap them in never ending wage slavery.

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yep exactly, it runs in her family. She was pregnant with her first baby at 15 and her husband was in his early 40’s. Her husband is older than her dad by 5 years. She is currently 41 and her husband is 73. She also has a younger sister like 5 years younger and I believe she basically did the same thing being pregnant at 15-16 with a much older man.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 hours ago

          My wife has one branch of her family where 4 generations occured in a 60 year period, the 5 generation photos are pretty neat, and also I’m really happy for the last generation which broke the cycle.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I knew someone who was by her own description baby-crazy as a teen and basically seeked out someone to knock her up. Hormones are wild things sometimes. Her child did not repeat the cycle fortunately

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Low birth rate, low immigration, government deep in debt. This looks bad for US retirement plans.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The replacement rate is down to 1.56, meaning every couple is having, on average, 1.56 children in the United States. We need two or above to keep the population at the same amount.

    There’s actually another way to keep the population up, and it’s great for America economically and culturally, and it makes the world a better place at the same time.

    • running_ragged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Or maybe we give up on an economic model that requires unending population growth? Since you know, we live on a finite planet?

      We have to find a path to degrowth. Stop repeating talking points that imply population growth is our only path forward.

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Global population growth is happening. Slowing down, but looks inevitable for at least several more decades. Given that baseline, it is optimal for all countries involved to allow immigration from countries with population growth (reduces strain on government services, adds to the economy with remittances) to countries with lower birth rates (tax revenues support social service budgets, increased entrepreneur rate of immigrants increases job growth, etc.)

        Economies can transition to population decline while maintaining standards of living for sure, if handled in a planned way. Some short-term pain during the transition, then fine later. But why go through a combination of short-term pain right now, at the same time as incredible cruelty is required to keep out migrants?

        A path to degrowth will be needed globally in the medium-term future (finite planet), but trying to implement that now at just the US locally isn’t going to help the planet at all.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Did you not understand that I was talking about immigration? Which is one of the ways we solve that. All of that.

        Besides which we’re actually talking about keeping the population stable. A declining population is bad for everyone economically. Luckily population growth naturally slows down in modernized societies, which is why allowing people to immigrate is good for everyone.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There’s nothing wrong with doing things that are (legitimately) great for America. I’d love to do things that are great for Russia and Israel too… but it’s unlikely that the leadership in those countries would consider them “great” actions.