- cross-posted to:
- spacepics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- spacepics@lemmy.world
This image of home just came down from the Artemis II crew.
Taken after their translunar injection burn, there are aurorae at top right and lower left, and zodiacal light at lower right.
Credit: NASA/Reid Wiseman
// That’s home. That’s us.
-–
Alternative references of better image quality mentioned in comments by @baguette@piefed.social:
- https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e000192;
- https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e000192/art002e000192~orig.jpg [5568 x 3712]
yawn, I’ve seen pictures like these since decades. Why did we need to send four people in a tin can for this now?
Down left, Spain.
Above, Northwest Africa.Top: the aurora australis.
Actually, now that I look closer, if you look even more down left, there’s also some aurora borealis!
Aurora Borealis!?
In this time of the year?!
At this time of year?
At this time of day?
In this economy?
Entirely localized on the hemispheres of this planet?
Behind: Things that are very very very very very very very far away.
Where are all the international borders?
/s
Sadly, you can see the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic from space. Dominican Republic is the side with vegetation.
I’m in this picture and I don’t like it
boooo!
Haha, is that a futurama quote
Kinda wild it looks like Gibraltar and the Sahara survived a water world incident.
Thank you, I was annoyed when the source link just went to a blue sky post from some rando who themselves didn’t post their source.
ISO 51200
I didn’t even know it could go that high. 🤣
Sony A1 MKii can hit 102,400 for stills.
AFAIK anything past 32,000 is digitally expanded (which could be done with RAW post-processing).
EDIT:
See: https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#Nikon D5_14,Sony ILCE-1M2_14
The old Nikon D5, impressively, doesn’t seem to post-scale even at ISO 102400
“Old” high-end DSLRs are aging well, digital photography has been in the diminishing returns for a while now. You’re almost surely getting better pictures out of a 10 year old flagship than a brand new mid-level camera, and the “thoroughly tested” part matters a lot in spaceflight
Still surprises me that it’s a D5 of all things, but then my main camera is only a year newer than that one. Not sure I’d use a DSLR at this point though.
My 2015 Sony a7s2 has “native” iso to 102400, and expanded to 409600, but it was a special full frame low light sensor and it’s only 12MP (most from back then were 20-30MP with the same sized sensor.
From Wikipedia:
For still images, the α7S II’s ISO is 100–102400 with expansion down to ISO 50 and up to ISO 409600 equivalent. For movies, the α7S II’s ISO is 100-102400 equivalent with expansion down to ISO 100 and up to ISO 409600 equivalent. For still images or movies on auto setting, the camera’s ISO is 100–12800 with selectable lower and upper limits.[2]
Oh look! More proof for flat earthers to look at and immediately decide is AI generated!
Looks cool, flat earth talk aside. If I wasn’t afraid of heights, I wouldn’t mind if I could see Earth from that high up some day.
Is “height” even a concept without gravity or ground?
I am like 99% sure you’re still being influenced by gravity at this distance
Well obviously gravity has infinite range in principle, however it does fall off with the square of the distance. So it will get irrelevant at some point, with local sources being the major factor. But obviously the Earth’s influence is still quite significant, since the Moon doesn’t go flying off. The Moon’s orbit is what it is because of the gravity of Earth, although the Sun is a huge factor as well.
The Moon’s gravity is what’s causing the tides on Earth, so both objects influence each other through gravity signifanctly. The spacecraft will be decelerating on the way to the Moon because the Earth is pulling it down. However once they cross a certain point, the Moon’s gravity becomes dominant and they get pulled towards the Moon. They are going too fast to be able to be captured by the Moon and get into an orbit. But they are going too fast to be captured by the Moon. So they will sling past the Moon, the Moon will pull them around and they will fall back to Earth again. They would then be going too fast to be in a proper orbit, instead being flung past the other side. So they will perform a braking maneuver to go back into Earth orbit and slow down further still to land back on Earth.
What confuses people is they see astronauts at 300km up and they are weightless. So one would assume gravity falls off much faster than it does. In fact at 300km the gravity from Earth is still 90% of what it is on the surface. The reason those astronauts are weightless is because they are falling.
Imagine a skydiver falling down and shaking hands with another skydiver, they are weightless compared to each other. If it weren’t for the air rushing by, you would be able to tell they were falling and they would look weightless. In fact there is this awesome video floating around where skydiver also have a car falling down and they get in it, it all looks weightless, because it is. The famous vomit comet plane does the same, it flies up, then follows a parabolic curve down (aka falling), before pulling up again. Whilst falling things are in fact weightless.
So if those astronauts are falling, how come they don’t fall down to the ground, obviously something is keeping them up there. The answer is speed, they are falling down, but at the same time going horizontally at great speed. Such a great speed in fact, they miss the Earth and instead fall around it. Imagine shooting a cannon faster and faster till it goes over the horizon and if fired fast enough all around the world.
Going to space isn’t about going up, it’s about going fast. The reason rockets go straight up is because they want to get above much of the atmosphere as fast as possible. This reduces air resistance and makes going faster easier (or possible even). As soon as they go up a little bit, they start turning to go horizontally, often in a so called gravity turn. This is where you use the gravity of Earth to curve downwards, so the gravity helps out instead of fighting it. LEO is only something like 300km up, and the widely recognized limit for “space” is only 100km up. You could easily drive that with your car in no time at all, so why do we need a huge rocket to get to space? Because to go into orbit you need to be going 8km/s, not 8km/h, but 8km every second. To go that fast you need a lot of power and a rocket has that power.
Orbital mechanics are really weird when you first learn about them. But we have the great Kerbal Space Program game to get a feel for them. Speed and altitude are directly related, changing one influences the other, often in ways we feel are not intuitive. This is why people who know faceplam at a movie like Gravity where an escape pod points up and just flies off into deep space. That’s not how any of this works, most likely there wouldn’t be enough energy (delta V as the nerds like to say) to get out of Earth orbit. At best it might end up in a helio centric orbit near Earth, but it’s unlikely. It isn’t like you can just point to outer space and go there.
That’s all there is. And a bunch of shortsighted rich motherfuckers are doing their best to end it.
The earth will be fine.
The plants and creatures on it? They will be battered, but recover.
Humans on the other hand… 👎
The planet is fine, the people are fucked
George Carlin
Deleted by author
This makes me want to cry.
I try to be stoic and harden my heart to defend it from the horrors of the world and current events, but this is just so beautiful and amazing and all I ever wanted since I was a kid.
I don’t know how people can look at this and be unable to pause and just want peace. We are so small and fragile.
We as a species should be working together, not trying to kill each other at every possible moment.
It’s all I’ve ever wanted, and as I’ve aged I’ve become jaded and felt it’s just been a stupid dream. But seeing this picture reminds me of that feeling, a world without borders.
Thank you NASA.
Many of us have been having the same stupid dream…
What is this bright thing at the center? Reflection of an interior light as it was taken through a window? Or what?

That’s my guess. It’s too large to be anything external.
Looks like window reflection.
You can also see the window frame at the bottom left.
Aliens with malfunctioning cloaking device
Just Starfleet violating directives again. It’s probably best to ignore it; somebody else’s problem.
Since the photo is received from the astronauts, it must be a reflection from their warm interior, indeed!
This image of home just came down from the Artemis II crew…
what am i looking at
Erf.
On the left side is North Africa with Europe below it, and on the right side is South America
Home.
To think we’d willingly destroy that beauty
It already looks browner and less vibrant.
To be fair that’s mostly the Sahara desert we’re looking at there, and South America is having a cloudy day
"As we can clearly see, the earth is flat, with australia being the only continent, apart from what we believe to be “east asia”. Also: this whole mission is totally fake. "
– Conspiracy mystics, probably.
You can see planet earth’s big naturals





















