(Apologies to Ivan Reitman.)

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nah. It’s “ancient” vs “modern”. “Modern” is anything well-documented or easily translated into English, “ancient” is anything that lacks documentation or has ambiguous translations. Some things I’ve seen ancient alien people freak out about: Stonehinge, pyramids, roman dodecahedrons, antikythera mechanism, ancient astronauts, UFOs in medieval/Renaissance art (yes, that is supposedly a thing), Nazca lines, and more.

    My point is that anything even remotely weird or inexplicable with any historical ambiguity is up for grabs when it comes to ancient alien theories. At least, that’s been my observation.

    *shrug*

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t know that a Quipu is a good example because we don’t actually know how they worked or how well they documented things. The burning of Mayan and other Mesoamerican books would be better examples.

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Okay, but that’s not on the ancient aliens people. According to your Wikipedia page, it wasn’t ancient alien theorists trying to prove bullshit that destroyed them, that was done by Christian nutjobs hundreds of years before anyone came up with the idea of ancient aliens.