A provoking thought i keep having.
Since “ai” (id rather call it just an aggregator/scraper but yeah) is just taking input from everything humans have done on the internet and spitting out an amalgamation, how exactly can we say its any different from an average musician who has influences from hundreds if not thousands of bands?
There’s many, many, songs out there that you can tell are inspired by others. How can you differentiate this from prompting the slop generator to “make a song similar to x artist and throw in some drum parts similar to y artist”. I myself definitely know the music I write has a sound to it that can be traced to a lot of groups I listen to, even if I just sit down and start writing I will naturally sometimes come up with something that sounds similar to music id been really into that week, for example. Of course I notice this and then work to change it up if possible, and many times others dont even hear the same influence I did in the end!
The only difference i can think of is, if you took a human baby, put them on an island with no music and a caretaker, and gave them a piano, they would create something. Of course a computer could never do this.
Peaceful discussion if we can. 🙂
But by derivating from human work, wouldn’t AI also bring the “human” part of the work when generating new contents? Even tho it doesn’t have a lived life, it may mimic the meaning of it by many means.
It provides a sort of amalgamation of the products of Human experiences, but that means it loses the uniqueness of a single Human being.