• teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The oldest millennials are in their early 40s now but to boomers they will always be teens.

        • Nangijala@feddit.dkBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          True. It is not a boomer who made that meme. It is either a troll or yet another bitter Gen X.

          • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            : Takes a sip of a juice pouch:

            It is true. A millennial becomes more bitter with age.

            : smacks tongue, eyes roll back as though recalling a childhood memory:

            But millennials have these… : swishes liquid millennial over palate:

            Bracing tannins that challenge you and require further observation.

            : Looking at cup:

            And he pondered, how DID he find himself at some sort of pre-historic blood ritual? Was this not his beautiful wife? Was this not his beautiful car?

      • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using the most common definition of those born 1981-1996: Oldest millennials turn 44 this year, youngest turn 29. Next year we’ll official transition to “30s to mid 40s.”

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as mental maturity goes I skipped from 15 to 65, which is to say I’ve never truly behaved as a normal adult free of childish and/or eccentric whims.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Red eye happens because of the flash. So still happens on digital cameras. It’s just nowadays they automatically detect and correct for it after the shot has taken. Or some cameras can do a pre flash before the flash for the shot fires or a light turns on when you half press the shutter button. That way the pupil will shrink and less light will enter the pupil and not light up the back of the eye.

      • Twiglet@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hate cameras that do the pre-flash with a burning passion, there’s a period in time where every (flash) photo of me either has me with my eyes closed or visibly straining to keep them open.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was so bad that the PC software that came with the camera often had a red eye removal feature. I remember being fascinated when I figured out you could use it on things other than eyes and it just took the red out of anything.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I immediately jumped to magical thinking and every person you took a picture of was robbed of blood.

          Before anyone asks, yes, I’m on the line with RL Stine as we speak.

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, even the older Gen-Z grew up with analog cameras, VHS players, paper maps, and no computers.

      I’m not sure people realize zoomers are almost 30, and millennials are nearing 50.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Right? Who made this? What millennial doesn’t remember red eye, it was in every damn photo when I was a kid and Im not a particularly old millennial.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Millennial here, have taken plenty of pictures during the end of the demon uprising in the mid-late 90s. It went on for a while.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Families wouldn’t know demons walked among them until the photos were produced. Usually by then the demon clued in and left its host without a trace before it could be exorcised.

  • jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, do digital cameras not do the red eye effect? Now that I think about it, I don’t think I’ve seen a photo with red eye in it in a long time, but I had always assumed that was a consequence of the camera flash, not the film…

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hardly anyone takes photos with a flash anymore.
      Phones instead crank up the sensitivity and use AI to get rid of the noise (=draw an image that vaguely resembles what’s in front of the camera).

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sensors themselves are also slightly better than 20 years ago, much less 40. Meaning they can probably produce a nicer image before all the AI shit.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh god , remember the anti red eye flash that strobed for a second before the flash?

        I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

        • 0xSim@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, that’s it. A first (few) flash(es) to contract your retina, and then the flash to take the picture.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

          I understood it as the red eyes you see in photos is the wide open iris of an eye you’re photographing zooming in on the blood vessels in the back of the eye. Flashing bright light before the photo makes the iris of the person you’re photographing contract significantly, so you can’t see the blood vessels in the back of the eye anymore.

  • FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I, Gen Z, am old enough too remember the red eyes on photos? What is this trying to say xd

  • phudgins@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope I did not spark a generational rift here, I only wanted to share a funny meme I found.

    • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a super cool N64 film camera that I took with me to sleepovers and took lots of shitty photos with because I was a dumbass kid that didn’t know anything about photography.

  • Bonus @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After holiday dinners, my grandpa would bust out the faux-leather bound Polaroid, mount it to a tripod and tell us all to stop moving, “It’s not a movie camera!” Then he’d be amazed it was almost ready 5 seconds later. Every single time.

    I remember when a flash was essentially an exploding bulb. Before me, they made a pop sound. In the 70s, there were cubes that rotated so you’d get multiple uses, IIRC. The real pros later had strobes but also, just bouncing the light off the ceiling and such cut down on the red eye which was really about light shooting directly into the eyes. That direct light also created harsh shadows and washed out features.

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My shirt 110 camera had a plug(boot?) that you could stick a bar of eight flash bulbs in to. Every picture triggered a super satisfying ‘snick!’ and one of the bulbs would be blown out.

      I guess that’s better than igniting a pile of phosphorous for illumination, but, what a waste!

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fun fact some may find disturbing, when you see a red-eye photo you’re actually looking at the inside of the person’s eyeballs. Red-eye in photos happens when a camera flash reflects off the back of the eye, specifically the choroid, a layer rich in blood vessels behind the retina. When the flash is too quick for the pupil to contract, the light enters the eye and bounces off this red tissue, giving you a great picture of the inside of their eyeballs. I hope everyone enjoys knowing that as much as I have.

    • SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And when it’s not red, you have a serious issue going on. This is actually how a couple initially noticed something was wrong with their toddler’s eye. Turned out she had cancer. She’s a healthy adult now, with a glass eye, but I have never looked at red eyes in photographs in a negative way since then.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even beyond that the 1980s is like the start of millennials. I’d ask if this was made by LLMs but I’d expect even those to get something that dumb correct.