Recently, there has been considerable interest in large language models: machine learning systems which produce human-like text and dialogue. Applications of these systems have been plagued by persistent inaccuracies in their output; these are often called “AI hallucinations”. We argue that these falsehoods, and the overall activity of large language models, is better understood as bullshit in the sense explored by Frankfurt (On Bullshit, Princeton, 2005): the models are in an important way indifferent to the truth of their outputs. We distinguish two ways in which the models can be said to be bullshitters, and argue that they clearly meet at least one of these definitions. We further argue that describing AI misrepresentations as bullshit is both a more useful and more accurate way of predicting and discussing the behaviour of these systems.

  • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Imagine still not realizing what a useful skill bullshitting is. Literally, hundreds of millions of people are professional bullshitters. So many people go do bullshit every day, all day. Having a machine that can produce the same or better bullshit than them frees them from suffering through doing all that bullshit. I can’t think of something that is more bullshit than pretending like there is no benefit from automating the bullshit out of our lives.

    • 200fifty@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except it’s not being automated out, is it? I find it hard to imagine how increasing the rate at which bullshit can be produced leads to a world with less bullshit in it.

      • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        It saves us from doing the bullshit that we are currently suffering through right now. It is rapidly getting better at doing it as well. 2 years ago, the best llms were preschool level, now they are high-school level, or arguably better.

        Sure, if we were already living in a world where nobody had any reason to produce BS, then it would be weird if we needed machines that could do it. The fact of the matter is though that we all use BS daily because it makes our lives better. The code that runs most apps you use could be way better, but it’s not, it’s BS. It gets the job done. The customer support people are making BS that at least gets you what you need. The teachers wade through hours of BS to find the same spelling mistakes, grammar mistakes, logical errors. You think they like doing that BS? Nope.

        BS machines have relieved so many people of so much BS and its only just the very beginning. This is the worst the BS machines will ever be, and it is improving at a blinding fast speed. The sooner people realise this, the sooner they can start trying to imagine the implications. Nearly everyone complaining about how useless they are, always point to the worse instances of outdated one-shot responses. They never talk about how awful the Claude Opus agent workflows are. That’s because the people who know what that stuff is realize what we are on the cusp of. An intelligence revolution is happening, some people have seen it already, many people will see it soon. Denying it is like scoffing at the idea that people will ever want their own computer.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        imagine a world with 10^^^ times more bullshit, but all the human bullshiters are unemployed! Able to do what they want (except pay rent).

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          i’ll take a world where all ad-makers, middle managers, salesmen, conmen, vcs and people who serve them pptxs filled with good idea powder thonking are unemployed (without the automated salesmen flooding internet tubes with drivel part)

    • antifuchs@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      See that sucker over there? If I don’t mug him, somebody else, probably a guy with much looser morals than me, will. [pulls down the balaclava]

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Problem is that it doesn’t automate away the bullshit in our lives. We’re creating even more bullshit that we’re forced to deal with online and at our jobs. Sure we can use the bullshit generator to respond to bullshit, but how do you know what’s bullshit in the first place, are you going to ask your bullshit generator to sort that out for you as well?