To be clear that is exactly why I find the analogy suspect lol, and at the same a tic of this particular milieu so I don’t believe it’s deliberate. Just god lesswrongers sure are weird about stuff.

No, the golden path isn’t a utopia! It’s the necessary breaking of eggs to make the survival of humanity omelet. It’s sort of a more twisted version of Asimov’s Foundation carried entirely in the mind of a being with perfect knowledge of causality. The details of the plot don’t necessarily map neatly, but the aesthetics, the fantasy, the torture-versus-dust-specksness of it is what the rationalists are all about. (Another wrinkle is that in Dune I believe [haven’t read beyond godemperor] ultimately the solution is to create a being that escapes prophecy, a neat little transcendent conjuration. Solving alignment doesn’t quite have the same oomph but it is also essentially a magic trick you can do if your freethinking and selfreliance stats are high enough. Also remember Rat!Harry’s patronus is a Human! Benevolent AI should be seen as the liberated, transcendent form of the human mind.)

Have you read the Dosadi Experiment? It’s a very strange book and a good way to get a high dose of Herbert’s obsessions from a new perspective.

To be clear I love Dune, and I find Herbert fascinating because his ideas always find themselves in tension and are often baffling and muddled enough to provoke entertaining discussion. But the more you scratch the more unambiguously evil he is.

the 4000 years of necessary tragedy and sacrifice, aka the golden path, is also remarkably similar to the rationalists’ teleology! specifically the longtermist stuff! i.e. it’s okay to sacrifice lives today to ensure humanity’s survival.

i think herbert’s feelings about breeding programs are … complicated. he never presents it as ethical but he does seem fascinated by the concept and he’s very very into the idea of forging supermen from extreme environmental pressure. like “comes up several times per book” levels of fascinated.

considering how much their philosophy aligns with the plot of dune, i’m afraid you may be right

A second vibecoded Aella website has hit the building

https://www.knockrup.com/

there’s a lot of ladies i know without guys, but who want kids. and i go ‘would you accept some rich guy paying u a ton of money to just have his kid as a single parent’ and they’re like ‘idk man prob not’ and im like ‘waht if it was 5m’ and they’re all magically like ‘oh yeah i would do it’

so i made a directory for this, but i am trying to find ladies who would actually like to list themselves with their moonshot baby-funding goal. if u know anybody who wouldn’t mind making a profile pls let me know, i wanna publicize the directory but need enough seeded ladies first

This is so gratuitous, and so irrelevant to the actual demographics of Israel (most Israeli are neither Ashkenazi nor Sephardi, which shouldn’t be a surprise if you’re vaguely aware of geography) that I have to wonder if this is meant as some sort of weird antisemitic dog whistle. Probably he couldn’t even say himself.

In any case, typical ignorance of Israel stans (and many critics sadly) who love to think of it as a white country.

Foundational values are a political technology that lossily compresses ideology into something more memetic.

Listen, we already know you’re a racist, you don’t have to work so hard to make us hate you!

“when you control for applicant qualifications discounted for affirmative action, there is no net racial discrimination in the ___ sector”

I’m not sure I understand this right (which I imagine is the purpose of his phrasing), but is this basically saying “if you assume black people are less competent, there is no racial discrimination”?

i know i’m not the target audience but my god the drudgery of organising ethicalseeming orgies, and consensual rape parties in particular, makes me feel many feelings. something sisyphean but the boulder is made out of gender roles and power dynamics and the slope is made of … libido? the rationalists might well be the people i trust the least in the world to deal with it.

imo one should treat others as ends in themselves, and not merely as means to an end

that is to say, ugh! rationalists talk about your relation to other people without making it about consumption challenge

Our concern is not with the defensive intent. It’s that the form of this particular probe is aggressive in effect, and the party that bears the cost is not the agent (which has no interests of its own) but the human operator downstream whose work the agent destroys if it follows the instruction.

… you think? aw shucks i only wanted to hurt bots

Big syringe

I don’t even know what to say here. Cool scam I guess

https://xcancel.com/herasight/status/2057888072092856823

Huh, I got déjà vu and yeah there’s this story from a couple months back! https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/30/1134780/r3-bio-brainless-human-clones-full-body-replacement-john-schloendorn-aging-longevity/

MIT Technology Review found no evidence that R3 has cloned anyone, or even any animal bigger than a rodent. What we did find were documents, additional meeting agendas, and other sources outlining a technical road map for what R3 called “body replacement cloning” in a 2023 letter to supporters. That road map involved improvements to the cloning process and genetic wiring diagrams for how to create animals without complete brains.

Please don’t let this be the next bubble.

Congratulations bb you’re a bog standard misogynist

“Cerisi” and gender confusion make me think this might be for some reason a machine translation of a generated summary, so like, two layers of slop?

You know, “most of said outfits” was too harsh. I’m gonna rate the outfits now, I love rating outfits!!!

2, 3 and 10 look like men you should run away from.

6 looks like he’s cosplaying as 60s italian movie riviera pinterest europe cinecitta, which I instinctively distrust. And I don’t care what anyone says, I will simply not abide the sockless loafer.

4, whatever. I do not want to talk him. We clearly have nothing in common.

8 is awesome. Looks like an actual cool guy, lovely outfit, love the pose. He’s what 6 wants to be.

7 is pretty cool too. Have to dock points for the very modelly pose, sadly, but still, pretty sick fit.

5 I don’t really like but he’s a more confidently realised version of 6 so good for him. Not tryhard or heterosexual-looking enough for me to hate. Keep it up.

9 I am sure I would absolutely love if I saw it on someone who didn’t look like they were fresh out the male model factory. Bonus points for uncreased trousers.

And finally 1 is obviously awesome but like. You cannot use this as an outfit recommendation. That’s just irresponsible. First the guy is buff as fuck and that is a necessary part of the outfit. It’s all about that mad silhouette. Second, I mean. This is pretty eccentric right. If you saw everyone dressing like this it would just be dumb. You cannot expect those poor lesswrongs to understand this.

TO BE CLEAR I am not advocating for nerd fashion I’m just working class

“It is fascinating to receive such communiqués of strange news from another star. I would not know, without your saying so, that the set of 10 pictures are intended to be good examples and not bad examples.”

To be fair most of said outfits read as “rich arsehole” to me, which I do not find attractive. Yellow shirt guy I would suspect to be a white supremacist.

As far as men’s fashion goes, I’ve seen much worse, though the bits I do like here feel fairly gay-coded to me so uh whatever. (I suspect those are the very same bits our Lesswrong Commenter is disapproving of.)

This feels like a misuse of the word ontology, but what do I know?

They keep doing it and it drives me mad!! I finally understood that they got the word from computer shit and not philosophy. Isn’t it just amazing? Here we thought they were vaguely aware of established philosophical concepts for a second!

What The Shit

I’ve been dating Nate for two years (tho wanna clarify we are not doing marriage-kids and we’re both actively looking for more serious other partners).

Nate is profoundly wonderful in many ways, like often surprises me in new ways of wonderfulness, and has raised my standards in partners. He’s deeply caring, attentive, competent, hilarious, and of course brilliant.

[…]

Iirc he’s explicitly said he doesn’t respect my thinking (edit: he clarifies he respects it in some areas but not others)