I do care aboutwhat is almost true. One gathers the facts and in the end gives an interpretation
That makes sense
Yes, you are right. But it seemed very quiet there.
did not know that. Thanks a lot!
the subject is superboring, I need to study in a short time and I am not a schoolboy (unfortunately) anymore. I need to do it for a teaching recruitment competition. The book – probably written by a bot – is foul. I love study and I love reading, but this is a torture. I turned to technology to save some of this torture. That’s all.
thanks, I’ve never thought of it, but the won’t never do such things, that would have seen as ‘peculato’. Here in Italy where corruption is a major problems that is an hyperlegislation to avoid it. Peculato would be, I believe, in English embezzlement
THanks for the info: is there any resource online?
thanks a lot man, this is really helpful: veyr understandable. (first time that I read in clear letter that this kind of technologiy is designed primarly to share information. And it is a shame that here in Europe laws don’t force corporation to build technology that has as a goal the privacy first. I am passionate in literature and Cultural studies, thus if we were living in another world I believe I would not read this stuff, because my heart beat for humanities (in a finite and short life: reading all Cormac McCarthy’s opus for a second time it would be for me highly preferrable than learn about networks, but this is the world I live in and I am tired of these damn corporation that treat people like objects)
Sorry, but I haven’t a clue of what you are saying.
This is the main problem, the lacuna between people who can use technolgy and ppl who cant’. How do I do it?
Thanks, but I’m also looking for vidoe, articles, divulgative materiel that show alternative sustainable solutions.
Thinking that a politician is like a hero, someone who comes to save the world, that is rather naive. The politician must be checked and kept in line by his her base, his electorate.
https://genius.com/Howard-zinn-chapter-5-a-kind-of-revolution-annotated Read this chapter turns out to be always useful
Until people won’t vote a socialist party things will go the way you’ve described. People can’t childishly complain about politicians when they have voted them. In America, during the elections, a meager minority go to vote. Until people won’t become politically active, why should things change?
I totally agree with that conceptual knot: people who live precarious lives aren’t going to make any risky moves because they live drenched in anxiety of ending down on the street. And it’s patent that every advance in technology will benefit an handful of mega rich, and the trickle down economy was a bull****. (Very interesting about this is Varoufakis and his concept of techno feudalism). Now, having said that: the only answer is political, the governments must build consistent safety nets to allow the growth of middle class, alleviate them the angst of turning into an army of homeless, so that when the basic needs are met: a house, cures and food, one can concentrate about how to plan and thrive in the future. The only method is taxing the rich, the tragicomically rich. https://digg.com/2020/this-scrolling-visualization-of-jeff-bezos-wealth-is-breaking-our-brains
Nope, we did not invest at all setting straight what Mussolini did to our country. We’ve been very loose and a ambiguous, with the result that they’re There are two factions o Pro and antifascists. What your comment made me think is the exploit of AFD in Germany, hence the investments not always are enough
I, who has written the comment, had the same feeling. I assure you that, being English not my mother tongue, was genuinely curious, but when I’ve seen the downvotes, I wanted to ask why, then I realized the I couldn’t care less. If people feel attacked by a comment and they want to do a reprimand via downvotes let them do it.
I don’t get the second part, what is it capitalism? It’s s philosophy, in my opinion.
How did you do it? It’s so slick
Is it correct to write more worse?