I projected this and so much more on (formerly) Twitter HQ in San Francisco. You can see then are sign that used to show the company name.

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    1. Guys, why did this get so many downvotes? (was it edited to be more mild?)
    2. What is this comment referencing? I don’t see “a second part”. Was the post edited?
    • vanveen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I, who has written the comment, had the same feeling. I assure you that, being English not my mother tongue, was genuinely curious, but when I’ve seen the downvotes, I wanted to ask why, then I realized the I couldn’t care less. If people feel attacked by a comment and they want to do a reprimand via downvotes let them do it.

      • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, if it helps, some solar punk posts like this one go mainstream. I think there’s only about 150 active solarpunk members so when a post gets close to 1000 votes that means non-community members are voting.

        I’ve commented on solarpunk stuff that was mildly in capatlism defense (much more controversial than your question), and had great conversations/critisims with almost no downvotes. So I think/hope the downvotes are not from the core solarpunk community. It is still sad, but I would be much more sad if it happened and the main post only had 100 upvotes.