sircac

In a lawless place there is no enforcement of one’s word, is blind trust or nothing…

At least until the bottom 50% has as much as the top 50%

Apparently it was due to old intel pre-2015 (when the building was repurposed as a school) where that building was allegedly an ammo depot of the military complex besides… bombing with 10 year old intel, for sure a lack of care for human lives

On TV I silenced them as they start and look elsewhere meanwhile… I find joy in training myself to be unable to consciously recognise at all what is ongoing till the video start

I double dare you!

Font matters

Indeed, without an error estimated from fluctuations, etc I cannot conclude how significative it was such…

Everyone? First time that I am aware of this possibility, either I lived under a stone or my sources are far from that “everyone”…

Many things, specially traumatic ones, rewires your brain

So do I on Civ…

The causation was an adendum to the context, the rest apply to the “statistically significant” claim

I am worry about the systematic error treatment of this data, cancer is per se very abnormal in growing parameters…

And what are the systematic errors on that? Cancer cells are abnormal in many ways per se, specially growing stats…

To be “2.5x the reference” a “statistically significant” deviation depends exclusively of the errors, including systematics, and I doubt that such has been so strongly constrained, known the abnormal behaviour and growing of cancer tissues in general versus none, not to mention that even if such can be evaluated as a significant deviation it does not imply causation, it can perfectly be consequence of the sample argument before (abnormal grown, which may imply abnormal densities easily) so I am still at a loss of the conclusions…

They are also found everywhere else, what does such statement try to imply?

Mmh… I think that tribal identification is a basic problem (the us vs their conundrum): the danger is obvious, admit this general simplified view to conform the “only two collectives” and judge them by choiced individuals and not by the root ideas and what they bring, if humans cannot overcome this instinct they will remain ants that follow queens for no good reason…

I would be worried if the contrary happens…

Any reference to Trump’s donors to back that Gepeto is the biggest one? I would like to see the top 10 or 100 list…

I love how I start to see frequently used the term of “addiction to socials” at a similar morale level of that of drugs

Mmh… I guess?

Some countries have military units with goat mascots, not for food but for morale, so, not really straightforward to me, honestly