Anisette [any/all]

when selecting any single person there are multiple things about them that are not average (plays violin/is gay/has 3 cats/…) yet we would still denote them as average people. So it very much does feel like the difference is a moral judgement

wow, he had an addiction? that’s crazy. surely having an addiction makes you evil, surely.

looks cool, might join somewhere next week!

I… don’t think saying looksmaxxing is in some way trans is meant as an insult? The way we tend to think of gender dysphoria is as a diagnosis specifically meant for people experiencing a different gender than the one assigned to them at birth, ie. trans people. A lot of people are now starting to point out that dysphoria is experienced by a lot of cis people as well. Although I suppose the guy in the comic almost definitely exists and I don’t want to run defense for him so: fuck that guy.

OT: Finally had to break with a long-time friend after he started sliding more and more into fascism. Feeling quite overwhelmed and emotionally exhausted right now.

if you like them in a gay way yes

It feels like someone being overwhelmed/exhausted to the point of saying “fuck it, I don’t care anymore” and afterwards rationalising the use of LLMs as the only way they can keep up, while simultaneously falling for it’s addiction. It does demonstrate why relying on one-man projects without chipping in is risky. Unfortunately the companies that rely on it are probably also captured by the bubble so they won’t think so.

I think the openbsd reimplementation is as of yet untouched at least, so that is an option

1. have you actually managed to read project lawful? because I’d like to know more about it but it is incredibly unreadable

2. what the fuck

Isn’t this exactly the managed democracy of helldivers 2?*

*I have not played the game, all I know is through cultural osmosis

I’ll see when these hashes materialise, until then I have to assume LLM companies are lying always about everything.

See, the problem is that I am not talking about human researchers, I am talking about other methods of automated fuzzing. I believe mozilla is overstating how useful the LLM has actually been. This has many reasons, one of them being that their main source of income is trying to become an LLM company. If that project fails said company might have to make some unfortunate cuts.

The problem is that I do not believe a word that anthropic says. They say this is only 1%, but do they have any proof to back it up? I am also sceptical of the claim that it can “look at the entire repo and how it all works together”. It can produce an approximation which could give it an advantage over more traditional fuzzers, but most reported bugs are still very local(and/or non-existant) and easily ruled out if it could actually model the naur theory behind the code.

The problem is that not “many actors” are able to attack at this scale, because running a scan at this scale is extremely expensive. If I were to run a thousand fuzzers on a piece of code I will almost certainly find a vulnerability, but I can’t do that because of the prohibitive cost. Anthropic is essentially buying marketing by doing this to make their product seem more useful than it is.

It’s really not. Out of the 23 000 something vulnerabilities claude claims to have discovered in open-source projects only 3-500 have been reported to repo owners, only 65 have been confirmed and given any rating at all. This is not any more efficient than any other form of fuzzing, they just did a whole lot of it.

I love Asbestos, very gender design

though if a shop is high-effort enough this might make it interesting again, whereas ai-generated content is always low-effort

god has a type and that type perfectly matches the racist and sexist preferences of the modern age

this has been the funniest bit. All the AI bros suddenly going “nooo I thought it would be subsidised forever why is it expensive now” as if this wasn’t the expected outcome from the start

of course they get caught by incel culture immediately, trying to quantify attractiveness is so far in their wheelhouse they might as well have come up with it

around and about sorta. still no javascript tho

I do use links2 sometimes for looking things up on wikipedia or reading blogs or something like that, easier than starting a gui browser. but the usecase is a tad niche