I once met a person that never drank water, only soft drinks. It’s not the unhealthiness of this that disturbed me, but the fact they did it without the requisite paperwork.

Unlike those disorganised people I have a formal waiver. I primarily drink steam and crushed glaciers.

  • 55 Posts
  • 153 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Thankyou Sandy.

    Is it blocking some rich wankers view?

    IDK. It’s behind the historic coal loader dock (very tall concrete structure) so you can’t see it from immediately next to it.

    I have to wonder about what’s happened in the lead up, there must have been some sort of negotiation or demand?

    Sounds like it. According to the NSW gov’s press release:

    The owners have previously been issued two Unsafe Vessel Notices (UVN) under section 46 of the Marine Safety Act requiring the owners to make in situ repairs to the vessel and to secure a dry dock for major works to repair the vessel’s hull.

    In situ repairs and maintenance have been going on for years (the non-cosmetic repairs I mention in the article). The last I heard dry-docking was planned for later this year, but the only dry-dock big enough is run by the navy and they have other priorities too.

    “Major works to repair” in drydock is interesting wording. Major works to make the ship pretty in drydock is definitely true (lots of cleaning back, priming and painting). We all want the drydock.












  • +1

    Tiny filters are a scam in the soldering world too. A few mm thick sheet of carbon impregnated open-cell foam isn’t going to have even a 50% impact on the fumes. Proper rated fume filtration systems are between the size of a large dog and a washing machine; and cost crazy amounts of money.

    Plumbing it outside is cheap, extremely effective, small and if something breaks you can tell immediately.





  • 97% goes towards paying suppliers, staff, utilities and covering other operating costs.

    I’m looking at the Woolworths 2026 Annual report and I do not know how you got those numbers. These reports are beautifully formatted cryptic messes designed to hide stuff, not to properly inform debate on government ownership or how the books would change under government operation.

    Their raw revenue was 72 billion, then they claim most of that is spent on these vague categories:

    • Cost of sales
    • Branch expenses
    • Administration expenses
    • Other expenses

    Some of these things contain some components of suppliers, staff and utilities. But there is a lot going other places.

    “Profit” is a very dangerous term because it’s intentionally gamed in the reporting by all companies to reduce tax liability. Woolworths claims they are only left with 1 billion in profit after they do their sums, but, under government control you’d realise that this number is really misleading. Eg checkout these things in their report:

    • 3 billion of asset depreciation
    • ~1 billion of shareholder dividends (remember that’s not “profit”!)
    • ~1 billion for underpaid staff rumeneration (it’s cheaper to pay them right in the first place and not have to do court costs, dear god)
    • (probably a lot more interesting stuff I’ve missed, on a train RN)

    I’m going to say their headline tiny profitability is not what you think it is, and that they’re not poor Woolies struggling with borderline profitability because of big employee and big supplier. For more fun on creative book keeping: checkout airlines. Some of them intentionally teeter themselves to reported non-profitability when it suits them.