He was a thrill to watch and I’d reckon he def helped change some opinions around US players at the time with the likes of Pulisic or McKennie continuing to this day.

This has to be a joke? He was one of the worst players in our team, and we were shit last year.

Success and relegation, sure? I think the ride that Leicester’s fans have had over the last 10 years looks fun.

However, to lose the spirit of the club for that success. No. Propping up sportswashing or being a plaything for an oligarch would put a splinter in the love I have for the club.

Maybe the number of great strikers hurts their totals. With some countries they have to stick with players for a long time, if you have a glut of talent you will change more often

And if he gets there I don’t see anyone moving him.

And if he gets there I don’t see anyone moving him.

If we are talking about what they can do in a game the best players now are better. They have better diets, drink less, have more coaches around them explaining tactics, and can analyse mistakes using video replays. Plus increased ability and presence of physio therapists.

That isn’t to say if you were to give Pele the same resources and understanding he couldn’t have been even better than he was or better than top players now. Maradona on the other hand I think would still go for the partying and drugs.

Would you rather KdB take the free kicks for your team or have Ronaldo blast 99/100 into the stands? If I were Pep I’d keep the guy who is really good at free kicks on free kicks instead of putting Haaland on them.

Between that and Onana’s ungiven foul against Wolves it really does show how much preference City get.