Film about ‘father of the atomic bomb’ finally opens in Japan after being delayed by outrage at ‘Barbenheimer’ memes

Archived version: https://archive.ph/8vjF7

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Every Purple Heart that has been given out since WW2 all come from a surplus we made in preparation for a land invasion of Japan. Think about that. Had the bombs not worked, our own estimates put the casualties at hundreds of thousands of soldiers. Just US soldiers. Not even counting Japanese soldiers or civilian lives. I don’t think the Soviets would have had a magical method to invade without similar casualties.

    Were the bombs the right move? I don’t know. It was almost 80 years ago in a complicated time that none of us discussing it now can fully understand. I think it’s telling that Japan surrendered shortly after. I also think it’s telling that no nuclear weapon has been used in combat since then. But based solely on our estimates of what a land invasion, either by the US or the Soviets, would cost in terms of lives lost, I do think it’s a fair argument to say the bombs wound up costing less.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think the Soviets would have had a magical method to invade without similar casualties.

      The USSR could invade Japan from the less populated and lightly defended north and northwest, while the US would have to invade from the heavily populated and well-defended south and east. This might have helped, but of course we can’t say anything for sure.

    • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s like you didn’t read either of the articles I linked to.

      Also saying they were used in combat, when the targets were specifically none military, is a gross misuse of the word.