Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone’s trust, but I can’t remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

    • miguel@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      That was the final straw for me, I switched over to waterfox for nominally more privacy.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I never fully did, but I did end up using Chromium more than I wanted to:

    1. Some poorly written sites refuse to work with FF. My water company, for example. They eventually fixed it after I complained multiple times. Now they display a warning that it’s “Optimized for Chrome” but no longer flat out prevent FF from logging in (you know, to pay bills and such).
    2. FF Desktop still doesn’t support PWAs, and their recent update says they’re working on it, but they’re half-assing it (installed web apps will still have the menu bars, address, bar etc). I self-host a lot of web applications and want them to appear like native apps. Hence, Chromium.
    3. There was some recent ToS / Privacy Policy change, and everyone was knee-jerking “time to abandon Firefox” as if there’s anywhere else to go.
    4. A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster. That’s been a while, and I think when FF’s “Quantum” update (or whatever it was called) came out in like 2016 or 2017, it put it back on par.
      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        It was. It was crazy fast and lightweight at the time.

        It gained massive market share.

        It became the default development target for websites.

        Other browsers started getting left behind.

        Each step syphons users from other browsers, compounding issues.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          The dev tools in Chrome were a revelation. I think Firefox had something similar (Firebug?) but the Chrome tools seemed better.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        I think OP is mostly focusing on why people switched off of FF. Present behaviour isn’t super relevant to the conversation.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        When Chrome initially came out? Not even close. Firefox was a bloated piece of crap, Chrome was slim and didn’t have all the bullshit that every other browser had.

        Obviously, things have changed a little…

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    It was too noisy. My wife and I used to live in a small apartment. I’d leave my Linux box on all the time. Running Firefox, it’d periodically spin up the fan, which was loud enough to annoy my wife at night, and me during the day. Chrome didn’t spin up the fan. I switched and we stopped hearing my noisy computer.

    This was a while ago. I can’t remember if it was Firefox or Mozilla at that point.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    The thing is, I never have. Chrome is absolute hot garbage and spyware, all the Chromium forks are all flawed and bugged and still feed into Google’s dominance because of engine and stupid Manifest bullshit. Firefox, despite all the stupid things Mozilla did and still does just works the best and is not Chromium.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        New Chromium framework for browser extensions that severely limits their functionality. It neuters adlockers.

      • Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Google sells it as an updated extension framework to improve security, privacy, and performance of extensions… But it also nerfs adblockers ability to block all ads.

        There are some forks from chrome that haven’t implemented the new manifest thing. So if you really need to, look for those.

        • Noerknhar@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Understood, that’s something to be expected by Google, but complete shit.

          However, adblockers still work these days - see Vivaldi, so they found a workaround?

          • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            There is no workaround as most browsers download extensions from Google’s extension repository and they don’t allow extensions that don’t follow their bullshit manifest. Ironically, only Opera has its own extensions repository/store that can do that. Others rely on their own built in adblockers.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          It didn’t break adblockers “at the time”. It broke them intentionally. That was by design. Google is an advertising company dabbling in other areas. They don’t want a browser that can properly block their primary revenue.

        • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          It was intentional to block/break adblockers. Google is worlds largest advertiser…

    • HKPiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Honestly, as a “non-power” Firefox user, the only issues I’m experiencing is when Google purposely slows down or messes with me simply because I use Firefox (e.g., YouTube).

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Dunno, Youtube works fine for me, watching without account. I don’t use anything else from Google, so can’t say if anything else is shit.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    A: Not all of us did.

    2: It sucked for a while, performance went down the toilet till they rewrote the engine in quantum.

    Honestly threading was horrible for a decade there, while chrome had multi-processes running solid, even extensions didn’t kill it, even if it burned 500gb ram to browse bash.org.

    Experiments were bad too, but you could shut those off.

    • LucJenson@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah, it’s amazing how few people remember just how terrible its performance tanked. The memory leaks were truly unbearable.

  • Goretantath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I use IronFox because firefox decided to support bad practices. Kinda like google removing “don’t be evil”.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I believe you’re thinking of a ToS change where the wording was incredibly vague, leading to some outlets to claim they were selling browsing data to 3rd parties and AI modelers. They changed it right after to specify that the data they were using wasn’t browsing data, and the data they did gather wouldn’t be used for AI. They are not as invasive as google, but you’re subject to Google on Firefox because of the ubiquity of their telemetry and search optimizations across websites. Firefox with an add-on such as noscript is much better than Chrome still, in my opinion. At the very least, it’s nice to have a browser that doesn’t work to undermine its own add-on functionalities.

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      This. It has been everywhere here around, if someone denies it, is lying! It was nothing in the end but in the meantime I tried Zen (based on FF) and it’s aesthetically more pleasing to me

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    What follows is a list of missteps Mozilla made since its inception. LibreWolf ftw. I hope Google has to divest of Chrome and forced to stop signing search deals to make them the default search engine on a browser. Can’t happen soon enough.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I never switched, I installed Chrome, started it, saw the UI, hated it, uninstalled it.